ChemInform Abstract: Sulfur Compounds. Part 124. Photoinduced ESR Signals in Orthorhombic cyclo-Octasulfur (α-S8) and in Quenched Liquid Sulfur at Low Temperatures.

ChemInform ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 20 (25) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. STEUDEL ◽  
J. ALBERTSEN ◽  
K. ZINK
1929 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 421-430
Author(s):  
H. P. Stevens ◽  
W. H. Stevens

Abstract (1) At low temperatures by means of accelerators it is possible to produce vulcanites containing “combined sulfur” considerably in excess of that required for the formula C5H8S. Such vulcanites may be obtained by vulcanizing at 100° with a variety of ultra-accelerators with and without zinc oxide as an activator. If zinc oxide or a zinc salt is used the excess coefficient cannot be explained by the presence of the zinc sulfide in the vulcanite. (2) The amount of sulfur combined with the rubber, given sufficient heating and presence of accelerator, is mainly dependent on the excess of sulfur present. (3) Extraction of the vulcanite with hydrochloric acid-ether mixture removes a part of the “combined” sulfur. A considerable amount is removed when the amount of combined sulfur is very large, but even then the amount of sulfur remaining is considerably in excess of that required by the formula C5H8S. (4) Vulcanization at low temperatures in solution in accordance with Whitby's procedure with the aid of accelerators also yields vulcanites with coefficients in excess of that required for the formula C5H8S. (5) The result of vulcanization at low temperatures is approximately the same, whether the rubber contains all the protein and serum ingredients, the usual proportion, or very little. (6) Extraction of sulfur from vulcanite with hot acetone vapor is not complete after 1210 hrs. (7) Having regard to the hydrogen sulfide and other volatile sulfur compounds evolved in appreciable quantities during vulcanization, it is evident that part of the combined sulfur results from substitution of hydrogen by sulfur. This substituted product is decomposed by the hydrochloric acid-ether mixture. It may not be possible to decompose the whole in this manner. Consequently, any “combined” sulfur in excess of that required by the formula C5H8S may result from substitution in the molecule.


Author(s):  
E. Knapek ◽  
H. Formanek ◽  
G. Lefranc ◽  
I. Dietrich

A few years ago results on cryoprotection of L-valine were reported, where the values of the critical fluence De i.e, the electron exposure which decreases the intensity of the diffraction reflections by a factor e, amounted to the order of 2000 + 1000 e/nm2. In the meantime a discrepancy arose, since several groups published De values between 100 e/nm2 and 1200 e/nm2 /1 - 4/. This disagreement and particularly the wide spread of the results induced us to investigate more thoroughly the behaviour of organic crystals at very low temperatures during electron irradiation.For this purpose large L-valine crystals with homogenuous thickness were deposited on holey carbon films, thin carbon films or Au-coated holey carbon films. These specimens were cooled down to nearly liquid helium temperature in an electron microscope with a superconducting lens system and irradiated with 200 keU-electrons. The progress of radiation damage under different preparation conditions has been observed with series of electron diffraction patterns and direct images of extinction contours.


Author(s):  
H.A. Cohen ◽  
W. Chiu

The goal of imaging the finest detail possible in biological specimens leads to contradictory requirements for the choice of an electron dose. The dose should be as low as possible to minimize object damage, yet as high as possible to optimize image statistics. For specimens that are protected by low temperatures or for which the low resolution associated with negative stain is acceptable, the first condition may be partially relaxed, allowing the use of (for example) 6 to 10 e/Å2. However, this medium dose is marginal for obtaining the contrast transfer function (CTF) of the microscope, which is necessary to allow phase corrections to the image. We have explored two parameters that affect the CTF under medium dose conditions.Figure 1 displays the CTF for carbon (C, row 1) and triafol plus carbon (T+C, row 2). For any column, the images to which the CTF correspond were from a carbon covered hole (C) and the adjacent triafol plus carbon support film (T+C), both recorded on the same micrograph; therefore the imaging parameters of defocus, illumination angle, and electron statistics were identical.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document