Leaching of Ti and V from the non‐magnetic fraction of ilmenite‐based ore: Kinetic and thermodynamic modelling

Author(s):  
Erick Max Mourão Monteiro de Aguiar ◽  
Amilton Barbosa Botelho Junior ◽  
Heitor Augusto Duarte ◽  
Denise Crocce Romano Espinosa ◽  
Jorge Alberto Soares Tenório ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (94/4) ◽  
pp. 27-32
Author(s):  
T.S. Skoblo ◽  
I.N. Rybalko ◽  
A.V. Tihonov ◽  
T.V. Maltsev

The possibility of using a non-magnetic fraction of a detonation charge with a diamond fraction from the disposal of ammunition to modify the restoration coatings of a natural product – clay and secondary raw materials — was studied. Four different coating variants were investigated. For this, a T-620 electrode was used with its additional modification by coating with bentonite clay, as well as with a non-magnetic fraction of the detonation charge and applying it in the form of a slip coating on the cutting surface of the cultivator. It is shown that the use of such additives allows to increase the resistance of the working tool of agricultural machines, reduces its tendency to damage due to the minimum penetration of the thin-walled product of the hoe blade and a decrease in the cross section of the transition layer and the level of stress. Each modifier makes changes to increase the microhardness to varying degrees. An increase in microhardness is observed on the surface of the coating and its gradual decrease to the transition layer. The surface coating with the additional introduction of bentonite clay in a liquid bath has the highest microhardness. Its microhardness varies from HV-50-1009.7 to HV-50-615.2. Similarly, the effect of the modifying additive of the detonation charge, the microhardness varies from HV-50-969.6 to HV-50-633.26. When clay or a mixture is introduced into the restoration coating, the wear resistance increases by 1.3 - 2 times with respect to the deposited surfacing only by the electrode and by 2 - 3 times to the initial material of the cultivator. It was found that the lowest coefficient is characteristic for dry friction, as well as for hydroabrasive, for samples with additional modification with clay or a detonation charge


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Anne Blackstone ◽  
◽  
Darren Gravley ◽  
Guilherme A.R. Gualda ◽  
David Dempsey ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob B. Forshaw ◽  
◽  
David J. Waters ◽  
David R.M. Pattison ◽  
Richard M. Palin ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Alberto López‐Grande ◽  
Rajesh Dagupati ◽  
Pedro Galán del Sastre ◽  
Francisco Muñoz

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1513
Author(s):  
Nour-Eddine Menad ◽  
Nassima Kana ◽  
Alain Seron ◽  
Ndue Kanari

The grown demand of current and future development of new technologies for high added value and strategic metals, such as molybdenum, vanadium, and chromium, and facing to the depletion of basic primary resources of these metals, the metal extraction and recovery from industrial by-products and wastes is a promising choice. Slag from the steelmaking sector contains a significant amount of metals; therefore, it must be considered to be an abundant secondary resource for several strategic materials, especially chromium. In this work, the generated slag from electric arc furnace (EAF) provided by the French steel industry was characterized by using multitude analytical techniques in order to determine the physico-chemical characteristics of the targeted slag. The revealed main crystallized phases are larnite (Ca2SiO4), magnetite (Fe3O4), srebrodolskite (Ca2Fe2O5), wüstite (FeO), maghemite (Fe2.6O3), hematite (Fe2O3), chromite [(Fe,Mg)Cr2O4], and quartz (SiO2). The collected slag sample contains about 34.1% iron (48.5% Fe2O3) and 3.5% chromium, whilst the vanadium contents is around 1500 ppm. The Mössbauer spectroscopy suggested that the non-magnetic fraction represents 42 wt% of the slag, while the remainder (58 wt%) is composed of magnetic components. The thermal treatment of steel slag up to 900 °C indicated that this solid is almost stable and few contained phases change their structures.


2021 ◽  
pp. 105272
Author(s):  
Matthew G. Shaw ◽  
Geoffrey A. Brooks ◽  
M. Akbar Rhamdhani ◽  
Alan R. Duffy ◽  
Mark I. Pownceby

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document