scholarly journals Identification of NTRK gene fusions in lung adenocarcinomas in the Chinese population

Author(s):  
Ruiying Zhao ◽  
Feng Yao ◽  
Chan Xiang ◽  
Jikai Zhao ◽  
Zhanxian Shang ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13539-e13539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen xian Wang ◽  
Chunwei Xu ◽  
Yu Chen ◽  
You-cai Zhu ◽  
Yueping Liu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 2003-2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunjian Pan ◽  
Yang Zhang ◽  
Ting Ye ◽  
Yue Zhao ◽  
Zhendong Gao ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3052-3052
Author(s):  
Ruiying Zhao ◽  
Yuchen Han ◽  
Chan Xiang ◽  
Shengnan Chen ◽  
Jikai Zhao ◽  
...  

3052 Background: Next-generation sequencing of DNA, which can provide valid information for clinical therapeutic decision-making, has been widely used in the management of lung cancer especially adenocarcinoma. However, due to its technical limitations for detecting certain alterations such as gene rearrangement, the DNA-based sequencing (DNA-seq) may miss the actionable alteration in some cases, who would have benefited from targeted therapy. The study aimed to evaluate the capability of RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) in identifying DNA-seq undetectable gene alterations in lung adenocarcinomas. Methods: A total of 219 lung adenocarcinomas, which had no driver alteration detected by DNA-seq (OncoScreen Plus, Burning Rock Biotech) and had a max AF ≥5%, underwent capture-based RNA-seq using a custom panel (OncoRNA, Burning Rock Biotech) spanning full transcripts of 115 genes commonly involved in cancer genomic rearrangements. Furthermore, an independent cohort of 100 DNA-seq driver–negative lung adenocarcinomas were also subjected to RNA-seq with the same panel. Results: In the discovery cohort, 166/219 samples (75.8%) generated qualified RNA-seq data for subsequent analyses. RNA-seq identified 44 previously undetected alterations (26.5%), including 40 gene fusions (24.1%), 1 MET exon14 skipping variant ( METex14, 0.6%) and 3 other alternative splicing variants (1.8%). Among them, 14 (8.4%) were potential actionable alterations, consisting of METex14 and in-frame fusions containing functional domain of the driver gene (4 ROS1 fusions, 3 BRAF fusions, 2 NRG1 fusions, 2 EGFR fusions, 1 ALK fusion and 1 MET fusion). In the validation cohort, 69/100 samples (69.0%) generated qualified data. RNA-seq identified 22 DNA-seq undetected alterations (31.9%), with 7 of them being potential actionable fusions (10.1%). ROS1 fusion remained as the most common actionable alteration (n = 3), followed by ALK fusion (n = 2), EGFR fusion (n = 1) and MET fusion (n = 1). Further analyses of the two datasets revealed that lacking sufficient coverage spanning the rearrangement breakpoint in the DNA-seq panel mainly accounted for the failure of DNA-seq on detecting these fusions. This can be improved by increasing the corresponding probe coverage in the DNA-seq panel. In addition, complex genomic rearrangement at DNA level and the presence of repetitive sequence in the intronic region spanning or adjacent to the breakpoint might lead to missed calling of canonical fusions by DNA-seq. Conclusions: Targeted RNA-seq can effectively identify genomic rearrangements that are undetectable by DNA-seq and provide lung adenocarcinoma patients with more opportunities for targeted therapy. Therefore, it should be recommended for all patients, in whom DNA-seq fails to detect driver alteration.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. S1117
Author(s):  
T. Li ◽  
P. Xing ◽  
J. Ying ◽  
S. Wang ◽  
Z. Xu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Yili Zhu ◽  
◽  
Ying Wu ◽  
Bo Huang ◽  
Jun Fan ◽  
...  

Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) gene fusions are detected in approximately 5% of lung adenocarcinomas, and data on double ALK fusions remain scarce because of their low occurrence rate. To date, there have been only a small number of case reports on double ALK fusions. In this report, we describe a novel double ALK fusion, FollicleStimulating Hormone Receptor (FSHR)-ALK and echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK, which was observed in a patient with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who was sensitive to alectinib. Alectinib treatment was administered orally 300 mg twice daily. After a month, imaging re-examination revealed a significant decrease in tumour size and markedly relieved atelectasis. According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours, the patient was considered to have a partial response to alectinib. To the best of our knowledge, this report is the first to describe this novel double ALK fusion in a patient, and these findings may provide a reference for other patients with such gene alterations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-89
Author(s):  
Xueying Li ◽  
◽  
Ling Yin ◽  
Yamei Zhao ◽  
Man He ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3545-3545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew James Weickhardt ◽  
Teresa T. Nguyen ◽  
Diego D. Paskulin ◽  
Anh T. Le ◽  
Dara Aisner ◽  
...  

3545 Background: Activation of ROS1 and ALK tyrosine kinases through gene fusions lead to unchecked cell proliferation and transformation. ROS1 and ALK gene fusions were found in about 5% and 2% of lung adenocarcinomas and are highly sensitive to specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors. This study aimed at identifying the presence of ROS1 and ALKrearrangements in CRC using FISH technology. Methods: Arrayed specimens of metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients were tested with a 4-target, 4-color break-apart FISH probe set (Abbott Molecular) designed to simultaneously evaluate the genomic status of ROS1 and ALK. Fused 3’/5’ signals of each gene were considered negative for rearrangement; single 3’/single 5’ (for ROS1) and split 3’-5’ or single 3’ (for ALK) were considered positive for rearrangement. Results: Among 236 mCRC patients tested, two were positive for ROS1 (single 3’ROS1 signals in 39% and 61% of tumor cells) and one was positive for ALK rearrangement (single 3’ALK in 41% of tumor cells). The upper cut-off for positive FISH patterns in the negative specimens was identified as <15% both for ROS1 and ALK. Interestingly, the ALK+ patient displayed intra-tumoral heterogeneity, detected in the tissue cores and confirmed in two resection blocks. The fusion partner for ALK was identified as EML4 by PCR-based tests and sequencing. The fusion partner(s) for ROS1 remains to be identified by other technologies. A small fraction of specimens presented duplicated or clustered copies of native ALK and ROS1. Conclusions: The novel FISH probe set was effective to identify the first cases of ROS1 rearrangements in CRC and re-confirm the occurrence of ALK rearrangements. This supports further evaluation of mCRC cases for ROS1 and ALK gene fusions as these may represent new targets for evaluation in clinical trials. Tumor heterogeneity in the ALK rearrangement must be addressed for screening tests. (Partially supported by research grant from Abbott Molecular and the Colorado CCSG P30CA046934).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document