Influence of local recurrence on survival in patients with extremity osteosarcoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

100 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer increases the breast preservation rate, but also increases the rate of local recurrence, probably because there is no standard technique to determine the amount of breast tissue to be removed. In 2007 we described a technique where the surgeon maps the extent of a breast tumor, plans a surgical incision, and tattoos the breast prior to the patient receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. After the chemotherapy, digital photographs are retrieved that allow the surgeon to precisely reconstruct where the margins of the original tumor were in the breast, and to proceed with a planned operation to remove the entire tumor bed but minimal surrounding breast tissue. The purpose of this study is to describe a series of patients treated with this technique and to evaluate the surgical and oncologic outcomes obtained. Methods: Data were collected from a prospective breast cancer database and from chart review on all patients treated with this technique at a single institution. Most patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy underwent the tattooing, unless they knew beforehand that they were going to undergo a mastectomy. Results: Between June 2005 and January 2011, 87 patients underwent breast tattooing followed by chemotherapy. Of patients who have completed subsequent definitive therapy, the initial surgery was mastectomy in 31 and lumpectomy in 53. Most patients’ tumors became nonpalpable following the therapy, and the pathologic complete and partial response rates were 22% and 64% respectively. Of patients who underwent an initial lumpectomy, 5/53 (9%) had positive margins and underwent further surgery (2 mastectomy and 3 wider lumpectomy). With a median follow-up of 36 months, only 1 patient has had an in-breast local recurrence. Conclusions: These early results clearly show a lower rate of re-excision and a lower rate of local recurrence than commonly reported in the literature for breast preservation following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The technique warrants wider application and further study.

Download Full-text

Outcome of leiomyosarcoma of bone: A single center experience.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.e21502 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e21502-e21502

Author(s):

Rajeev Rajendra ◽

Seth Pollack ◽

Eve T. Rodler ◽

Ernest U. Conrad ◽

Darin J Davidson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Local Recurrence ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Surgical Resection ◽

Treatment Strategies ◽

Recurrence Time ◽

Low Grade ◽

High Grade ◽

Response To Chemotherapy

e21502 Background: Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) of bone is a very rare sarcoma subtype. These tumors are managed akin to osteosarcoma, with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. The precise role of chemotherapy remains to be defined. Methods: Patients treated with primary bone LMS at the University of Washington between 2002 and 2012 were included. Patients with high grade tumors were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery; whereas those with low grade tumors were treated with surgical resection alone. Chemotherapy consisted of doxorubicin and ifosfamide x 2 cycles. Treatment details included: initial treatment (surgery versus chemo), surgical and pathological margins, and timing of chemotherapy. Follow-up data included: time to local recurrence, time to metastasis, time to last follow up if alive, or time to death. Results: Ten patients were identified, 4 male and 6 female. Median age at diagnosis: 52 years (range 29 - 91). The primary site was the distal femur in 5 patients, and the hemipelvis, acetabulum, proximal femur, distal clavicle and mid-shaft of femur in 1 patient each. Median tumor size at diagnosis was 8 cm. Five were high-grade tumors; 3 were intermediate and 2 were low grade. Four of 10 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with the following histological response; 70%, 30%, 15% and <5%. None of these patients had a dimensional radiological response to chemotherapy. Of the patients treated with surgery alone, one developed a local recurrence and another developed metastatic disease. Of the patients treated with chemotherapy and surgery, 1 died from an unrelated cause. Median follow-up was 9 months (range 0 - 83). Median DFS was 9 months (range 0 - 83). OS has not yet been reached. Conclusions: Surgical resection remains the mainstay of management of LMS of bone. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy requires further evaluation. Larger collaborative studies and biomarker analyses are essential to evaluate optimal treatment strategies for this rare disease.

Download Full-text