FDA approves changes to Vyvanse drug label

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 8-8
Keyword(s):  
2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (24) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
ALICIA AULT
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 205510291664195
Author(s):  
Michael P Ryan ◽  
Reagan N Costello-White ◽  
Mercedes N Sandoval

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (08) ◽  
pp. 337-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Payman Shahabi ◽  
Laura Scheinfeldt ◽  
Daniel Lynch ◽  
Tara Schmidlen ◽  
Sylvie Perreault ◽  
...  

SummaryPharmacogenomics (PGx) guided warfarin dosing, using a comprehensive dosing algorithm, is expected to improve dose optimisation and lower the risk of adverse drug reactions. As a complementary tool, a simple genotype-dosing table, such as in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Coumadin drug label, may be utilised for general risk assessment of likely over- or under-anticoagulation on a standard dose of warfarin. This tool may be used as part of the clinical decision support for the interpretation of genetic data, serving as a first step in the anticoagulation therapy decision making process. Here we used a publicly available warfarin dosing calculator (www.warfarindosing.org) to create an expanded gene-based warfarin dosing table, the CPMC-WD table that includes nine genetic variants in CYP2C9, VKORC1, and CYP4F2. Using two datasets, a European American cohort (EUA, n=73) and the Quebec Warfarin Cohort (QWC, n=769), we show that the CPMC-WD table more accurately predicts therapeutic dose than the FDA table (51 % vs 33 %, respectively, in the EUA, McNemar’s two-sided p=0.02; 52 % vs 37 % in the QWC, p<1×10−6). It also outperforms both the standard of care 5 mg/day dosing (51 % vs 34 % in the EUA, p=0.04; 52 % vs 31 % in the QWC, p<1×10−6) as well as a clinical-only algorithm (51 % vs 38 % in the EUA, trend p=0.11; 52 % vs 45 % in the QWC, p=0.003). This table offers a valuable update to the PGx dosing guideline in the drug label.Supplementary Material to this article is available at www.thrombosis-online.com.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Spinel Karas ◽  
Federico Innocenti

Irinotecan is an anticancer agent widely used for the treatment of solid tumors, including colorectal and pancreatic cancers. Severe neutropenia and diarrhea are common dose-limiting toxicities of irinotecan-based therapy, and UGT1A1 polymorphisms are one of the major risk factors of these toxicities. In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration revised the drug label to indicate that patients with UGT1A1*28 homozygous genotype should receive a decreased dose of irinotecan. However, UGT1A1*28 testing is not routinely used in the clinic, and specific reasons include lack of access to concise information on this wide issue as well as mixed recommendations by regulatory and professional entities. To assist oncologists in assessing whether and when to use UGT1A1 genetic testing in patients receiving irinotecan-based therapies, this article provided (1) essential knowledge of UGT1A1 polymorphisms; (2) an update on the impact of UGT1A1 polymorphisms on efficacy and toxicity of contemporary irinotecan-based regimens; (3) dosing adjustments based upon the UGT1A1 genotypes, and (4) recommendations from currently available guidelines from the US and international scientific consortia and major oncology societies.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Hesty Utami Ramadaniati ◽  
Heni Safarini ◽  
Aishah A Regine

Off-label is a term used in which a  drug prescribed outside the official information of the marketing authorization.  Off-label prescribing may occur as the result of several factors including  lack of clinical trials data involving pediatrics and suitable formulations for medicines commonly prescribed to this fragile population. Objective: This study aimed to estimate the nature and prevalence of off-label prescribing in pediatric inpatients with pneumonia. Material and Methods: a retrospective study was conducted in a study hospital using medical records from pediatric inpatients with pneumonia during the period of January-December 2015. Patient and prescribing data were collected, and drugs were classified as on-label or off-label based on the Indonesia National Drug Information (IONI) and British National Formulary for Children (BNFC). Thereafter, off-label drugs were categorized with a hierarchical system of age, indication, route of administration and dosage. Results: There were 1141 drugs with 77 different types of drug were administered to 207 patient during the study period. The data uncovered that 405 (35,5%) of the drug prescriptions were used off-label based on IONI, and 319 (28%) of the drug were used off-label based on BNFC. Based on IONI and BNFC, most off-label drugs were from anti infection drugs. Conclusion: The prevalence of off-label use in pediatric inpatients with pneumonia is not high. The off-label prescribing may not be necessarily  be considered irrational, yet this fact reveals that the use of drugs does not comply with the drug label. Clinical trials for pediatric drugs are essential to provide  complete product information for pediatric use.


2005 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 891-894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen L. Steinmetz ◽  
Kim C. Coley ◽  
Bruce G. Pollock
Keyword(s):  

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e039291
Author(s):  
Yvonne Pfeiffer ◽  
Chantal Zimmermann ◽  
David L. B. Schwappach

ObjectivesDouble checking is used in oncology to detect medication errors before administering chemotherapy. The objectives of the study were to determine the frequency of detected potential medication errors, i.e., mismatching information, and to better understand the nature of these inconsistencies.DesignIn observing checking procedures, field noteswere taken of all inconsistencies that nurses identified during double checking the order against the prepared chemotherapy.SettingOncological wards and ambulatory infusion centres of three Swiss hospitals.ParticipantsNurses’ double checking was observed.Outcome measuresIn a qualitative analysis, (1) a category system for the inconsistencies was developed and (2) independently applied by two researchers.ResultsIn 22 (3.2%) of 690 observed double checks, 28 chemotherapy-related inconsistencies were detected. Half of them related to non-matching information between order and drug label, while the other half was identified because the nurses used their own knowledge. 75% of the inconsistencies could be traced back to inappropriate orders, and the inconsistencies led to 33 subsequent or corrective actions.ConclusionsIn double check situations, the plausibility of the medication is often reviewed. Additionally, they serve as a correction for errors and that are made much earlier in the medication process, during order. Both results open up new opportunities for improving the medication process.


2019 ◽  
Vol 131 (6) ◽  
pp. 1344-1344
Author(s):  
Meghan Prin ◽  
Clare Evans Algeo ◽  
Lucy Kalonga ◽  
Christophe Mkwezalamba

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document