Persistence of nicotinic agonist RJR 2403-induced working memory improvement in rats

2002 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward D. Levin ◽  
N. Channelle Christopher
1999 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 405-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward D. Levin ◽  
N.Channelle Christopher ◽  
Tiffani Weaver ◽  
John Moore ◽  
Frederic Brucato

2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 1938-1942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Bellander ◽  
Yvonne Brehmer ◽  
Helena Westerberg ◽  
Sari Karlsson ◽  
Daniel Fürth ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sami Yousif ◽  
Monica D. Rosenberg ◽  
Frank Keil

Spatial information plays an important role in how we remember. In general, there are two (non mutually exclusive) views regarding the role that space plays in memory. One view is that objects overlapping in space interfere with each other in memory. For example, objects presented in the same location (at different points in time) are more frequently confused with one another than objects that are not. Another view is that spatial information can ‘bootstrap’ other kinds of information. For example, remembering a phone number is easier one can see the arrangement of a keypad. Here, building on both views, we test the hypothesis that task-irrelevant spatial structure (i.e., objects appearing in stable locations over repeated iterations) improves working memory. Across 7 experiments, we demonstrate that (1) irrelevant spatial structure improves memory for sequences of objects; (2) this effect does not depend on long-term spatial associations; (3) this effect is unique to space (as opposed to features like color); and (4) spatial structure can be teased apart from spatial interference, and the former drives memory improvement. We discuss how these findings challenge and extend both ‘spatial interference’ and ‘visuospatial bootstrapping’ accounts.


SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A47-A47
Author(s):  
N Sattari ◽  
L Whitehurst ◽  
K Vinces ◽  
S Mednick

Abstract Introduction It is widely accepted that “offline” processes during sleep contributes to memory. Working Memory (WM) capacity, which reflects “online” memory processing, is an important factor influencing cognitive functioning, which declines with age. In younger individuals, a positive association is reported between WM-capacity and declarative memory improvement. Methods We examined the relation between WM and long-term memory consolidation, among younger [N=105, 18-25yr] and older adults (N=119, 60-85yr). Subjects completed an OSPAN WM task, encoded a Word-Paired Association (WPA) task in the morning (Test1), and were tested on the WPA in the afternoon (Test2) after a 90-minute polysomnographically-recorded nap or wake. Half of the subjects were exposed to negatively valenced word-pairs (EWPA) while the other half were exposed to neutral word-pairs (NWPA). Subjects rated valence of the word-pairs at Test1 and Test2. We compared the four groups (young-EWPA, young-NWPA, old-EWPA and old-NWPA) on WM and WPA in both wake and sleep. Results In both wake and sleep, in the WPA, ageXword-condition interaction was found (p=.004). Post-hoc analysis revealed that in wake, younger-EWPA had higher performance (p=.03) than younger-NWPA, however, older-EWPA had lower performance (p=.03) than older-NWPA. Additionally, we found an ageXword-condition interaction whereby youngers showed no change in ratings, while older adults rated word-pairs more positively both in wake (p=.03) and sleep (p=.002) at Test 2. Youngers had higher WM performance (p=.007), also their WM performance was positively associated with WPA both for Neutral (p=.03) and Emotional (p=.01). WM and WPA among older adults was not related. In younger-EWPA, Stage2-sleep-minutes was positively associated to WPA improvement (p=.03) where this association was negative among older-EWPA (p=.02). In older-NWPA, Stage2-sleep-minutes was positively associated with WPA (p=.004). Conclusion Our findings indicate an association between WM and emotionally-salient memory formation that is modulated by age. Older adults, but not younger, showed the emotional bias previously reported. WM was higher in younger adults related to memory improvement. Stage2-sleep was related to memory improvement in both groups, but in opposite directions. In sum, the role of sleep in memory consolidation changes with aging and WM may play a role in this process. Support Fenn et al.,2012


2019 ◽  
Vol 370 ◽  
pp. 111940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tenzin Tselha ◽  
Lauren N. Whitehurst ◽  
Benjamin D. Yetton ◽  
Tina T. Vo ◽  
Sara C. Mednick

2010 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 74-75
Author(s):  
Maria Apostolidou ◽  
Vasiliki Siatra ◽  
Maria Gini ◽  
Elvira Masoura ◽  
Nikos Foroglou ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document