scholarly journals A phenological shift in the time of recruitment of the shipworm,Teredo navalisL., mirrors marine climate change

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 3862-3870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christin Appelqvist ◽  
Jonathan N Havenhand
2014 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 165-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Chilvers ◽  
Irene Lorenzoni ◽  
Geraldine Terry ◽  
Paul Buckley ◽  
John K. Pinnegar ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (21) ◽  
pp. 9276
Author(s):  
Ha Kyung Lee ◽  
So Jeong Lee ◽  
Min Kyung Kim ◽  
Sang Don Lee

Information on the phenological shift of plants can be used to detect climate change and predict changes in the ecosystem. In this study, the changes in first flowering dates (FFDs) of the plum tree (Prunus mume), Korean forsythia (Forsythia koreana), Korean rosebay (Rhododendron mucronulatum), cherry tree (Prunus yedoensis), and peach tree (Prunus persica) in Korea during 1920–2019 were investigated. In addition, the changes in the climatic factors (temperature and precipitation) and their relationship with the FFDs were analyzed. The changes in the temperature and precipitation during the January–February–March period and the phenological shifts of all research species during 1920–2019 indicate that warm and dry spring weather advances the FFDs. Moreover, the temperature has a greater impact on this phenological shift than precipitation. Earlier flowering species are more likely to advance their FFDs than later flowering species. Hence, the temporal asynchrony among plant species will become worse with climate change. In addition, the FFDs in 2100 were predicted based on representative concentration pathway (RCP) scenarios. The difference between the predicted FFDs of the RCP 4.5 and RCP 6.0 for 2100 was significant; the effectiveness of greenhouse gas policies will presumably determine the degree of the plant phenological shift in the future. Furthermore, we presented the predicted FFDs for 2100.


2017 ◽  
Vol 78 ◽  
pp. 114-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Frost ◽  
John Baxter ◽  
Paul Buckley ◽  
Stephen Dye ◽  
Bethany Stoker

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 41-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen S. Ban ◽  
Hussein M. Alidina ◽  
Thomas A. Okey ◽  
Rachel M. Gregg ◽  
Natalie C. Ban

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 3770-3780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rongshuo Cai ◽  
Hongjian Tan ◽  
Qinghua Qi

Palaios ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 250-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANDREW L.A. JOHNSON ◽  
ANNEMARIE VALENTINE ◽  
MELANIE J. LENG ◽  
HILARY J. SLOANE ◽  
BERND R. SCHÖNE ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul J. Buckley ◽  
John K. Pinnegar ◽  
Suzanne J. Painting ◽  
Geraldine Terry ◽  
Jason Chilvers ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 1306-1318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid E. van Putten ◽  
Stewart Frusher ◽  
Elizabeth A. Fulton ◽  
Alistair J. Hobday ◽  
Sarah M. Jennings ◽  
...  

Abstract The changing geographical distribution of species, or range shift, is one of the better documented fingerprints of climate change in the marine environment. Range shifts may also lead to dramatic changes in the distribution of economic, social, and cultural opportunities. These challenge marine resource users' capacity to adapt to a changing climate and managers' ability to implement adaptation plans. In particular, a reluctance to attribute marine range shift to climate change can undermine the effectiveness of climate change communications and pose a potential barrier to successful adaptation. Attribution is a known powerful predictor of behavioural intention. Understanding the cognitive processes that underpin the formation of marine resource users' beliefs about the cause of observed marine range shift phenomena is therefore an important topic for research. An examination of the attribution by marine resource users of three types of range shifts experienced in a marine climate change hotspot in southeast Australia to various climate and non-climate drivers indicates the existence of at least three contributing cognitions. These are: (i) engrained mental representations of environmental phenomena, (ii) scientific complexity in the attribution pathway, and (iii) dissonance from the positive or negative nature of the impact. All three play a part in explaining the complex pattern of attribution of marine climate change range shifts, and should be considered when planning for engagement with stakeholders and managers around adaptation to climate change.


2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (17) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinru Li ◽  
Kirsten Zickfeld ◽  
Sabine Mathesius ◽  
Karen Kohfeld ◽  
J. B. Robin Matthews

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document