scholarly journals Drought effect on plant biomass allocation: A meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (24) ◽  
pp. 11002-11010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anwar Eziz ◽  
Zhengbing Yan ◽  
Di Tian ◽  
Wenxuan Han ◽  
Zhiyao Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biomass Allocation ◽  
Plant Biomass ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Drought Effect

The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review

2000 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendrik Poorter ◽  
Oscar Nagel
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Area ◽  
Biomass Allocation ◽  
Mass Fraction ◽  
Plant Biomass ◽  
Growth Parameters ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Carbon Gain ◽  
Leaf Biomass ◽  
Functional Equilibrium ◽  
Leaf Mass

The allocation of biomass to different plant organs depends on species, ontogeny and on the environment experienced by the plant. In this paper we first discuss some methodological tools to describe and analyse the allocation of biomass. Rather than the use of shoot:root ratios, we plead strongly for a subdivision of biomass into at least three compartments: leaves, stems and roots. Attention is drawn to some of the disadvantages of allometry as a tool to correct for size differences between plants. Second, we tested the extent to which biomass allocation of plants follows the model of a ‘functional equilibrium’. According to this model, plants respond to a decrease in above-ground resources with increased allocation to shoots (leaves), whereas they respond to a decrease in below-ground resources with increased allocation to roots. We carried out a meta-analysis of the literature, analysing the effect of various environmental variables on the fraction of total plant biomass allocated to leaves (leaf mass fraction), stem (stem mass fraction) and roots (root mass fraction). The responses to light, nutrients and water agreed with the (qualitative) prediction of the ‘functional equilibrium’ theory. The notable exception was atmospheric CO2, which did not affect allocation when the concentration was doubled. Third, we analysed the quantitative importance of the changes in allocation compared to changes in other growth parameters, such as unit leaf rate (the net difference between carbon gain and carbon losses per unit time and leaf area), and specific leaf area (leaf area: leaf biomass). The effects of light, CO2 and water on leaf mass fractions were small compared to their effects on relative growth rate. The effects of nutrients, however, were large, suggesting that only in the case of nutrients, biomass allocation is a major factor in the response of plants to limiting resource supply.

A meta-analysis of the response of terrestrial plant biomass allocation to simulated N deposition

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
毛晋花 MAO Jinhua ◽  
邢亚娟 XING Yajuan ◽  
闫国永 YAN Guoyong ◽  
王庆贵 WANG Qinggui
Keyword(s):  
Biomass Allocation ◽  
Plant Biomass ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
N Deposition ◽  
Terrestrial Plant

The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review

2000 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendrik Poorter ◽  
Oscar Nagel
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Area ◽  
Biomass Allocation ◽  
Mass Fraction ◽  
Plant Biomass ◽  
Growth Parameters ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Carbon Gain ◽  
Leaf Biomass ◽  
Functional Equilibrium ◽  
Leaf Mass

The allocation of biomass to different plant organs depends on species, ontogeny and on the environment experienced by the plant. In this paper we first discuss some methodological tools to describe and analyse the allocation of biomass. Rather than the use of shoot:root ratios, we plead strongly for a subdivision of biomass into at least three compartments: leaves, stems and roots. Attention is drawn to some of the disadvantages of allometry as a tool to correct for size differences between plants. Second, we tested the extent to which biomass allocation of plants follows the model of a ‘functional equilibrium’. According to this model, plants respond to a decrease in above-ground resources with increased allocation to shoots (leaves), whereas they respond to a decrease in below-ground resources with increased allocation to roots. We carried out a meta-analysis of the literature, analysing the effect of various environmental variables on the fraction of total plant biomass allocated to leaves (leaf mass fraction), stem (stem mass fraction) and roots (root mass fraction). The responses to light, nutrients and water agreed with the (qualitative) prediction of the ‘functional equilibrium’ theory. The notable exception was atmospheric CO2, which did not affect allocation when the concentration was doubled. Third, we analysed the quantitative importance of the changes in allocation compared to changes in other growth parameters, such as unit leaf rate (the net difference between carbon gain and carbon losses per unit time and leaf area), and specific leaf area (leaf area: leaf biomass). The effects of light, CO2 and water on leaf mass fractions were small compared to their effects on relative growth rate. The effects of nutrients, however, were large, suggesting that only in the case of nutrients, biomass allocation is a major factor in the response of plants to limiting resource supply.

scholarly journals A Meta-Analytical Approach on Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Inoculation Efficiency on Plant Growth and Nutrient Uptake

Agriculture ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 370
Author(s):  
Murugesan Chandrasekaran
Keyword(s):  
Plant Growth ◽  
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi ◽  
Nutrient Uptake ◽  
Mycorrhizal Fungi ◽  
Host Plants ◽  
Plant Biomass ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal ◽  
Growth Responses ◽  
Mycorrhizal Plants

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are obligate symbionts of higher plants which increase the growth and nutrient uptake of host plants. The primary objective was initiated based on analyzing the enormity of optimal effects upon AMF inoculation in a comparative bias between mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants stipulated on plant biomass and nutrient uptake. Consequently, in accomplishing the above-mentioned objective a vast literature was collected, analyzed, and evaluated to establish a weighted meta-analysis irrespective of AMF species, plant species, family and functional group, and experimental conditions in the context of beneficial effects of AMF. I found a significant increase in the shoot, root, and total biomass by 36.3%, 28.5%, and, 29.7%, respectively. Moreover, mycorrhizal plants significantly increased phosphorus, nitrogen, and potassium uptake by 36.3%, 22.1%, and 18.5%, respectively. Affirmatively upon cross-verification studies, plant growth parameters intensification was accredited to AMF (Rhizophagus fasciculatus followed by Funniliforme mosseae), plants (Triticum aestivum followed by Solanum lycopersicum), and plant functional groups (dicot, herbs, and perennial) were the additional vital important significant predictor variables of plant growth responses. Therefore, the meta-analysis concluded that the emancipated prominent root characteristics, increased morphological traits that eventually help the host plants for efficient phosphorus uptake, thereby enhancing plant biomass. The present analysis can be rationalized for any plant stress and assessment of any microbial agent that contributes to plant growth promotion.

Explaining within-community variation in plant biomass allocation: a balance between organ biomass and morphology above vs below ground?

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 431-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grégoire T. Freschet ◽  
Emilie Kichenin ◽  
David A. Wardle
Keyword(s):  
Biomass Allocation ◽  
Plant Biomass ◽  
Below Ground ◽  
Community Variation

scholarly journals Belowground plant biomass allocation in tundra ecosystems and its relationship with temperature

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 055003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Wang ◽  
Monique M P D Heijmans ◽  
Liesje Mommer ◽  
Jasper van Ruijven ◽  
Trofim C Maximov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biomass Allocation ◽  
Plant Biomass ◽  
Belowground Plant Biomass ◽  
Tundra Ecosystems

Effects of short-term N addition on plant biomass allocation and C and N pools of theSibiraea angustatascrub ecosystem

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 212-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Wang ◽  
H. L. He ◽  
Q. Gao ◽  
C. Z. Zhao ◽  
W. Q. Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biomass Allocation ◽  
Plant Biomass ◽  
N Addition ◽  
Short Term ◽  
C And N ◽  
C And N Pools

scholarly journals Silicon enhancement of estimated plant biomass carbon accumulation under abiotic and biotic stresses. A meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zichuan Li ◽  
Zhaoliang Song ◽  
Zhifeng Yan ◽  
Qian Hao ◽  
Alin Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plant Biomass ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Carbon Accumulation ◽  
Biomass Carbon ◽  
Abiotic And Biotic Stresses ◽  
Biotic Stresses

Global change alters peatland carbon cycling through plant biomass allocation

2020 ◽  
Vol 455 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 53-64
Author(s):  
Jing Tian ◽  
Brian A. Branfireun ◽  
Zoë Lindo
Keyword(s):  
Global Change ◽  
Carbon Cycling ◽  
Biomass Allocation ◽  
Plant Biomass

scholarly journals Does Time since Fire Explain Plant Biomass Allocation in the Florida, USA, Scrub Ecosystem?

Fire Ecology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonali Saha ◽  
Alessandro Catenazzi ◽  
Eric S. Menges
Keyword(s):  
Biomass Allocation ◽  
Plant Biomass ◽  
Time Since Fire
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document