scholarly journals Is MHC diversity a better marker for conservation than neutral genetic diversity? A case study of two contrasting dolphin populations

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 6986-6998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Manlik ◽  
Michael Krützen ◽  
Anna M. Kopps ◽  
Janet Mann ◽  
Lars Bejder ◽  
...  
2002 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. 539-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul D Anderson ◽  
John C Zasada ◽  
Glen W Erickson ◽  
Zigmond A Zasada

A white pine (Pinus strobus L.) stand at the western margin of the species range, approximately 125 years of age at present, was thinned in 1953 from 33.5 m2 ha-1 to target residual basal areas of 18.4, 23.0, 27.5, and 32.1 m2 ha-1 . Repeated measurement over the following 43-years indicated that the greatest total volume production and the greatest number of large diameter trees occurred in the unit of highest residual density. Over time, the distribution of stems was predominantly random although mortality between 1979 and 1996 resulted in a tendency for clumping in the 23.0 and 27.5 m2 ha-1 treatments. DNA analysis indicated that thinning intensity had little effect on the genetic diversity of residual white pine. This study suggests that mature white pine stands in northern Minnesota may be managed at relatively high densities without loss of productivity. However, regardless of overstory density, there was little or no white pine regeneration occurring in this stand. Key words: thinning, growth, genetic diversity, molecular markers, spatial pattern, regeneration


Author(s):  
Eddington Gororo ◽  
Fungayi Primrose Chatiza ◽  
Farisai Chidzwondo ◽  
Stanley Marshall Makuza

2008 ◽  
Vol 254 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Valbuena-Carabaña ◽  
S.C. González-Martínez ◽  
L. Gil

Crop Science ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 2363-2373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim El-basyoni ◽  
P. Stephen Baenziger ◽  
Ismail Dweikat ◽  
Dong Wang ◽  
Kent Eskridge ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1329-1337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura K. Reynolds ◽  
Kathryn A. Tiling ◽  
Gina B. Digiantonio ◽  
Vincent G. Encomio ◽  
Lori J. Morris

2014 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBIN WELLMANN ◽  
JÖRN BENNEWITZ ◽  
THEO H. E. MEUWISSEN

SummaryAs extinction of local domestic breeds and of isolated subpopulations of wild species continues, and the resources available for conservation programs are limited, prioritizing subpopulations for conservation is of high importance to halt the erosion of genetic diversity observed in endangered species. Current approaches usually only take neutral genetic diversity into account. However, adaptation of subpopulations to different environments also contributes to the diversity found in the species. This paper introduces two notions of adaptive variation. The adaptive diversity in a trait is the excess of variance found in genotypic values relative to the variance that would have been expected in the absence of selection. The adaptivity coverage of a set of subpopulations quantifies how well the subpopulations could adapt to a large range of environments within a limited time span. Additionally, genome-based notions of neutral diversities were obtained that correspond to well known pedigree-based definitions. The values of subpopulations for conservation of adaptivity coverage were compared with their conservation values for adaptive diversity and neutral diversities using simulated data. Conservation values for adaptive diversity and neutral diversities were only slightly correlated, but the values for conservation of adaptivity coverage showed a reasonable correlation with both kinds if the time span was chosen appropriately. Hence, maintaining adaptivity coverage is a promising approach to prioritize subpopulations for conservation decisions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document