scholarly journals Nesting, brood rearing, and summer habitat selection by translocated greater sage‐grouse in North Dakota, USA

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kade D. Lazenby ◽  
Peter S. Coates ◽  
Shawn T. O’Neil ◽  
Michel T. Kohl ◽  
David K. Dahlgren
2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt T. Smith ◽  
Jeffrey L. Beck ◽  
Christopher P. Kirol

Context Inter- and intraspecific habitat partitioning is widespread across taxa, yet limited information is available on differences in intraspecific habitat selection by same-sex individuals among differing reproductive states. Understanding habitat selection by conspecifics of different reproductive states may help optimise conservation efforts, particularly for gallinaceous bird species such as greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus), which are long-lived but have only moderate reproductive rates. Aims We predicted that habitat use differed between grouse under different reproductive states and that reproductive investment decreased survival of adults in summer. Methods We compared habitat characteristics used by brood-rearing and broodless female sage-grouse and evaluated the influence of reproductive investment and habitat use on survival of adult females. Key results We found that brood-rearing and broodless female sage-grouse partitioned habitat at micro- and macrohabitat scales. Broodless females were more likely to survive the summer. Conclusions Our findings suggest reproductive state variability in habitat selection by female sage-grouse. Broodless females were roosting and foraging in concealed habitats with intermediate visual obstruction and annual vegetation productivity, but less food forb availability compared with early and late brood-rearing females. In contrast, brood-rearing females likely selected more herbaceous understoreys to predictably maximise foraging opportunities and promote growth of their chicks, which appeared to mitigate the influence of reproductive costs on summer survival, particularly during the late brood-rearing period. Implications Survival of adult females is critical for population persistence of sage-grouse and other long-lived Galliformes, yet conservation efforts generally focus on habitats used during nesting and brood-rearing. Our results suggest that habitat partitioning is a potential risk-aversion strategy where individuals across different reproductive states likely select habitats to maximise their survival. Conservation efforts should focus on conserving habitats used by both brood-rearing and broodless sage-grouse to ensure population persistence.


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 126
Author(s):  
Jennifer Woodward ◽  
Jenny Sika ◽  
Carl Wambolt ◽  
Jay Newell ◽  
Sean Schroff ◽  
...  

<p class="emsd"><span lang="EN-GB">Greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) habitat characteristics were studied in central Montana primarily on Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt. ssp. wyomingensis Beetle &amp; Young) dominated rangeland. The primary objective was to compare shrub and herbaceous parameters within (use, random or non-use) and between seasonal habitats (nest, brood, winter). Two study sites (Musselshell and Golden Valley counties), and 2 years (2004 and 2005) were compared. Nest, brood, and random sites were compared for herbaceous cover, and grass height (n = 648). Nest, brood, random, winter use and winter non-use sites were evaluated for shrub cover, density, and height. All differences were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05. Sage-grouse nested in areas with greater total shrub cover and height, and taller live and residual grass than was randomly available. No differences were found between brood and paired random sites for any of the herbaceous or shrub parameters measured. Shrub cover and density were greater at winter use sites than non-use sites. Winter use sites had less shrub cover than nest sites. The nest and brood habitat had similar shrub cover, density, and height on the study area. Sage-grouse habitats should be managed to include sagebrush, forbs, and grass. Herbaceous vegetation was more important during nesting and brood rearing than during the winter. Therefore, some portions of <span>sage-</span>grouse habitat may benefit from management for greater herbaceous cover, but not at the expense of removing sagebrush. Sagebrush cover from 10 to 15 percent was the most consistent component of sage-grouse habitat.</span></p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 576-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
David K. Dahlgren ◽  
Terry A. Messmer ◽  
Benjamin A. Crabb ◽  
Michel T. Kohl ◽  
Shandra N. Frey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 332-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin M. Thompson ◽  
Matthew J. Holloran ◽  
Steven J. Slater ◽  
Jarren L. Kuipers ◽  
Stanley H. Anderson

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 344-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
ESTHER SEBASTIÁN-GONZÁLEZ ◽  
CRISTINA FUENTES ◽  
MARCOS FERRÁNDEZ ◽  
JOSÉ L. ECHEVARRÍAS ◽  
ANDY J. GREEN

SummaryUnderstanding habitat requirements is vital for developing successful management strategies for threatened species. In this study we analyse the habitat selection of two globally threatened waterbirds (Marbled Teal Marmaronetta angustirostris and White-headed Duck Oxyura leucocephala) coexisting in an internationally important wetland (El Hondo Natural Park, south-eastern Spain) at three spatial scales. We surveyed adults and broods of these species fortnightly during two consecutive years and we related density and presence of birds to several habitat variables. At a pond-selection scale, the density of both species was related to the surface area of the ponds, with Marbled Teal showing avoidance of medium-sized ponds, and White-headed Ducks strong selection for the largest ponds. Within ponds, Marbled Teal avoided open waters, and was mainly associated with Phragmites reedbeds, but also selected areas with saltmarsh and Scirpus vegetation, especially for brood-rearing. White-headed Duck made more use of deeper areas with open water, especially in winter, and Phragmites was the only emergent vegetation with which it associated. When breeding success was very high in 2000, strong creching of broods was observed in White-headed Duck, but not in Marbled Teal. In order to provide suitable habitat for both species, there is a need to maintain spatial diversity with a combination of large wetlands suitable for both species and small, vegetated ones suitable for the Marbled Teal.


1974 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Wallestad ◽  
Philip Schladweiler

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. e26273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Dzialak ◽  
Chad V. Olson ◽  
Seth M. Harju ◽  
Stephen L. Webb ◽  
James P. Mudd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 74 (7) ◽  
pp. 1533-1543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael T. Atamian ◽  
James S. Sedinger ◽  
Jill S. Heaton ◽  
Erik J. Blomberg

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 249-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalina Signorell ◽  
Sven Wirthner ◽  
Patrick Patthey ◽  
Rebekka Schranz ◽  
Luca Rotelli ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document