The norm of internality in the explanation of psychological events

1988 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 299-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Ean-Léon Beauvois ◽  
Nicole Dubois
1964 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.J. Walton ◽  
F.M. McPherson
Keyword(s):  

1964 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. 776-798
Author(s):  
William R. Uttal ◽  
Louella Cook ◽  
Hedwig Kasprzak

2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla C. Braghetta ◽  
Glícia P. Santana ◽  
Quirino Cordeiro ◽  
Sergio P. Rigonatti ◽  
Giancarlo Lucchetti

OBJECTIVE: Near-death experiences have been defined as profound psychological events that may occur to a person while close to death or in a situation of extreme physical or emotional distress. These experiences seem to have an important effect on the patients’ mental health and may occur in several situations despite their cultural and religious beliefs. CASE DESCRIPTION: The present case report describes the positive impact of a near-death experience (Greyson scale > 7) followed by religious conversion on the mental health of a former prisoner. COMMENTS: Investigation of the role of near-death experiences by the scientific community could shed light on the coping mechanisms and moral/ethical transformations that take place in these individuals.


2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca M. Todd ◽  
Vladimir Miskovic ◽  
Junichi Chikazoe ◽  
Adam K. Anderson

Recent advances in our understanding of information states in the human brain have opened a new window into the brain's representation of emotion. While emotion was once thought to constitute a separate domain from cognition, current evidence suggests that all events are filtered through the lens of whether they are good or bad for us. Focusing on new methods of decoding information states from brain activation, we review growing evidence that emotion is represented at multiple levels of our sensory systems and infuses perception, attention, learning, and memory. We provide evidence that the primary function of emotional representations is to produce unified emotion, perception, and thought (e.g., “That is a good thing”) rather than discrete and isolated psychological events (e.g., “That is a thing. I feel good”). The emergent view suggests ways in which emotion operates as a fundamental feature of cognition, by design ensuring that emotional outcomes are the central object of perception, thought, and action.


2009 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitch J. Fryling ◽  
Linda J. Hayes
Keyword(s):  

1991 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 305-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Herd

The behavioral characteristics of psychological stressors have been operationally defined. A psychological stressor is one that causes a stress response in a predictable percentage of index subjects. However, it may not always produce a stress response, and the probability of producing such a response depends on interactions between the behavioral situation and the individual involved. Thus there is a danger that a psychological stressor will be defined according to the stress response it causes rather than its structural characteristics. The characteristics that enhance the likelihood that a psychological stressor will cause a stress response are its novel, challenging, or threatening aspects that engage a subject in continuous active mental effort. The intensity of the stress response depends on the intensity of mental effort exerted to meet a challenging situation, whether or not that situation is perceived as threatening. The behavioral response to a psychological stressor also has been defined. It includes somatomotor, neuroendocrine, and cardiovascular components. The somatomotor response to stressful psychological events includes purposeful active coping to counter the challenge or threat posed by the stressor. The neuroendocrine response includes a combination of pituitary-adrenal cortical and hypothalamic-sympathetic-adrenal medullary secretions. The cardiovascular response includes a combination of increased rate and force of cardiac contraction, skeletal muscle vasodilation, venoconstriction, splanchnic vasoconstriction, renal vasoconstriction, and decreased renal excretion of sodium. Of all the modifiers that influence the stress response to a psychological stressor, family history is the one most likely to have an effect. A family history of essential hypertension increases the likelihood that a subject will respond to a psychological stressor with a cardiovascular stress response pattern. Other predisposing characteristics that increase the likelihood of a stress response include behavioral patterns of response to challenge or threat but may also include anatomic or biochemical characteristics that increase susceptibility to neurogenic activation of central aminergic mechanisms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document