Comparison of rainfall estimates from GPM dual-frequency precipitation radar and ground dual-polarization radar

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leilei Kou ◽  
Ying Mao ◽  
Zhixuan Wang ◽  
Yao Chen ◽  
Zhigang Chu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Dual Polarization ◽  
Precipitation Radar ◽  
Rainfall Estimates

scholarly journals Cross-Validation of Observations between the GPM Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar and Ground Based Dual-Polarization Radars

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sounak Biswas ◽  
V. Chandrasekar
Keyword(s):  
Large Data ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Dual Polarization ◽  
Precipitation Radar ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Ka Band ◽  
Radar Observations ◽  
Radar Calibration ◽  
Ku Band

The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission Core Observatory is equipped with a dual-frequency precipitation radar (DPR) with capability of measuring precipitation simultaneously at frequencies of 13.6 GHz (Ku-band) and 35.5 GHz (Ka-band). Since the GPM-DPR cannot use information from polarization diversity, radar reflectivity factor is the most important parameter used in all retrievals. In this study, GPM’s observations of reflectivity at dual-frequency and instantaneous rainfall products are compared quantitatively against dual-polarization ground-based NEXRAD radars from the GPM Validation Network (VN). The ground radars, chosen for this study, are located in the southeastern plains of the U.S.A. with altitudes varying from 5 to 210 m. It is a challenging task to quantitatively compare measurements from space-based and ground-based platforms due to their difference in resolution volumes and viewing geometry. To perform comparisons on a point-to-point basis, radar observations need to be volume matched by averaging data in common volume or by re-sampling data to a common grid system. In this study, a 3-D volume matching technique first proposed by Bolen and Chandrasekar (2003) and later modified by Schwaller and Morris (2011) is applied to both radar data. DPR and ground radar observations and products are cross validated against each other with a large data set. Over 250 GPM overpass cases at 5 NEXRAD locations, starting from April 2014 to June 2018, have been considered. Analysis shows that DPR Ku- and Ka-Band reflectivities are well matched with ground radar with correlation coefficient as high as 0.9 for Ku-band and 0.85 for Ka-band. Ground radar calibration is also checked by observing variation in mean biases of reflectivity between DPR and GR over time. DPR rainfall products are also evaluated. Though DPR underestimates higher rainfall rates in convective cases, its overall performance is found to be satisfactory.

scholarly journals Sensitivity of 89–190-GHz Microwave Observations to Ice Particle Scattering

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (7) ◽  
pp. 1195-1215
Author(s):  
Ruiyao Chen ◽  
Ralf Bennartz
Keyword(s):  
Radar Reflectivity ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Precipitation Radar ◽  
Brightness Temperatures ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Microwave Humidity Sounder ◽  
Slant Path ◽  
The One ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

AbstractThe sensitivity of microwave brightness temperatures (TBs) to hydrometeors at frequencies between 89 and 190 GHz is investigated by comparing Fengyun-3C (FY-3C) Microwave Humidity Sounder-2 (MWHS-2) measurements with radar reflectivity profiles and retrieved products from the Global Precipitation Measurement mission’s Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR). Scattering-induced TB depressions (ΔTBs), calculated by subtracting simulated cloud-free TBs from bias-corrected observed TBs for each channel, are compared with DPR-retrieved hydrometeor water path (HWP) and vertically integrated radar reflectivity ZINT. We also account for the number of hydrometeors actually visible in each MWHS-2 channel by weighting HWP with the channel’s cloud-free gas transmission profile and the observation slant path. We denote these transmission-weighted, slant-path-integrated quantities with a superscript asterisk (e.g., HWP*). The so-derived linear sensitivity of ΔTB with respect to HWP* increases with frequency roughly to the power of 1.78. A retrieved HWP* of 1 kg m−2 at 89 GHz on average corresponds to a decrease in observed TB, relative to a cloud-free background, of 11 K. At 183 GHz, the decrease is about 34–53 K. We perform a similar analysis using the vertically integrated, transmission-weighted slant-path radar reflectivity and find that ΔTB also decreases approximately linearly with . The exponent of 0.58 corresponds to the one we find in the purely DPR-retrieval-based ZINT–HWP relation. The observed sensitivities of ΔTB with respect to and HWP* allow for the validation of hydrometeor scattering models.

scholarly journals An Initial Assessment of the Surface Reference Technique Applied to Data from the Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) on the GPM Satellite

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (12) ◽  
pp. 2281-2296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Meneghini ◽  
Hyokyung Kim ◽  
Liang Liao ◽  
Jeffrey A. Jones ◽  
John M. Kwiatkowski
Keyword(s):  
Cross Section ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Precipitation Radar ◽  
Frequency Method ◽  
Ka Band ◽  
Spaceborne Radar ◽  
Ku Band

AbstractIt has long been recognized that path-integrated attenuation (PIA) can be used to improve precipitation estimates from high-frequency weather radar data. One approach that provides an estimate of this quantity from airborne or spaceborne radar data is the surface reference technique (SRT), which uses measurements of the surface cross section in the presence and absence of precipitation. Measurements from the dual-frequency precipitation radar (DPR) on the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) satellite afford the first opportunity to test the method for spaceborne radar data at Ka band as well as for the Ku-band–Ka-band combination.The study begins by reviewing the basis of the single- and dual-frequency SRT. As the performance of the method is closely tied to the behavior of the normalized radar cross section (NRCS or σ0) of the surface, the statistics of σ0 derived from DPR measurements are given as a function of incidence angle and frequency for ocean and land backgrounds over a 1-month period. Several independent estimates of the PIA, formed by means of different surface reference datasets, can be used to test the consistency of the method since, in the absence of error, the estimates should be identical. Along with theoretical considerations, the comparisons provide an initial assessment of the performance of the single- and dual-frequency SRT for the DPR. The study finds that the dual-frequency SRT can provide improvement in the accuracy of path attenuation estimates relative to the single-frequency method, particularly at Ku band.

Understanding performance of GPROF precipitation retrievals over the Netherlands in relation to precipitation characteristics as derived from ground-based dual-polarization radars

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Bogerd ◽  
Hidde Leijnse ◽  
Aart Overeem ◽  
Remko Uijlenhoet
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Background Radiation ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Dual Polarization ◽  
Ground Clutter ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Global Precipitation ◽  
Precipitation Events

<p>The Global Precipitation Measurement mission (GPM) is one of the recent efforts to provide satellite-based global precipitation estimates. The GPM Profiling Algorithm (GPROF) converts microwave radiation measured by passive microwave (PMW) sensors onboard constellation satellites into precipitation. Over land, precipitation estimates are obtained from high frequency PMW-channels that measure the radiance scattered by ice particles in rain clouds. However, due to the limited scattering related to shallow and light precipitation, it is challenging to distinguish these signals from background radiation that is naturally emitted from the Earth’s surface.</p><p>Increased understanding of the physical processes during precipitation events can be used to improve PMW-based precipitation retrievals. This study couples overpasses of GPM radiometers over the Netherlands to two dual-polarization radars from the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI). The Netherlands is an ideal setting for this study due to the availability of high-quality ground-based measurements, the frequent occurrence of shallow events, the absence of ground-clutter related to mountains, and the varying background emission related to its coastal location.</p><p>The coupling of overpasses with ground-based precipitation radars provides the opportunity to relate GPROFs performance to physical characteristics of precipitation events, such as the vertical reflectivity profile and dual-polarization information on the melting layer. Furthermore, simultaneous radiometer estimates and space-based reflectivity profiles from the dual-frequency precipitation radar (DPR) onboard the GPM core satellite are coupled to the ground-based reflectivity profiles for selected case studies. Because the a-priori database implemented in the GPROF algorithm is based on observations from the DPR, the comparison of the reflectivity profiles further unravels discrepancies between GPROF and ground-based estimates.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document