Comparison of Przm and Gleams computer model predictions with field data for alachlor, metribuzin and norflurazon leaching

1992 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 427-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas C. Mueller ◽  
Parshall B. Bush ◽  
Philip A. Banks ◽  
Ronald E. Jones
1982 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald M. McOmber ◽  
Charles A. Moore ◽  
Brian W. Beatty

Methane migration field data obtained at the Mississauga landfill in Mississauga, Ontario was used to verify computer model predictions. Because a migration control system had been in operation at the site for a year, the soil adjacent to the landfill was initially free of methane. Thus, it was possible to verify the models by first shutting down the control system. Then gas probes installed in the soils adjacent to the landfill were used to monitor the ensuing outward migration of methane. This paper compares the data obtained with computer model predictions for purely diffusional gas flow and for combined pressure–diffusional gas flow. In the region within 25 m of the landfill the computer predictions compared well with the observed field concentrations; however, beyond 25 m the observed gas concentrations exceeded predictions. The gas behavior at one probe in particular was not adequately predicted. The computer model was used to further investigate this anomoly.


2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 13097-13128 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Hartig ◽  
C. Dislich ◽  
T. Wiegand ◽  
A. Huth

Abstract. Inverse parameter estimation of process-based models is a long-standing problem in ecology and evolution. A key problem of inverse parameter estimation is to define a metric that quantifies how well model predictions fit to the data. Such a metric can be expressed by general cost or objective functions, but statistical inversion approaches are based on a particular metric, the probability of observing the data given the model, known as the likelihood. Deriving likelihoods for dynamic models requires making assumptions about the probability for observations to deviate from mean model predictions. For technical reasons, these assumptions are usually derived without explicit consideration of the processes in the simulation. Only in recent years have new methods become available that allow generating likelihoods directly from stochastic simulations. Previous applications of these approximate Bayesian methods have concentrated on relatively simple models. Here, we report on the application of a simulation-based likelihood approximation for FORMIND, a parameter-rich individual-based model of tropical forest dynamics. We show that approximate Bayesian inference, based on a parametric likelihood approximation placed in a conventional MCMC, performs well in retrieving known parameter values from virtual field data generated by the forest model. We analyze the results of the parameter estimation, examine the sensitivity towards the choice and aggregation of model outputs and observed data (summary statistics), and show results from using this method to fit the FORMIND model to field data from an Ecuadorian tropical forest. Finally, we discuss differences of this approach to Approximate Bayesian Computing (ABC), another commonly used method to generate simulation-based likelihood approximations. Our results demonstrate that simulation-based inference, which offers considerable conceptual advantages over more traditional methods for inverse parameter estimation, can successfully be applied to process-based models of high complexity. The methodology is particularly suited to heterogeneous and complex data structures and can easily be adjusted to other model types, including most stochastic population and individual-based models. Our study therefore provides a blueprint for a fairly general approach to parameter estimation of stochastic process-based models in ecology and evolution.


2014 ◽  
Vol 119 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie M. Lydersen ◽  
Brandon M. Collins ◽  
Carol M. Ewell ◽  
Alicia L. Reiner ◽  
Jo Ann Fites ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Dorin Drignei ◽  
Zissimos P. Mourelatos ◽  
Ramesh Rebba

Sensitivity analysis and computer model calibration are generally treated as two separate topics. In sensitivity analysis one quantifies the effect of each input factor on outputs, whereas in calibration one finds the values of input factors that provide the best match to a set of field data. In this paper we show a connection between these two seemingly separate concepts, and illustrate it with an automotive industry application involving a Road Load Acquisition Data (RLDA) computer model. We use global sensitivity analysis for computer models with transient responses to screen out inactive input parameters and make the calibration algorithm numerically more stable. Because the computer model can be computationally intensive, we construct a fast statistical surrogate for the computer model with transient responses. This fast surrogate is used for both sensitivity analysis and RLDA computer model calibration.


Author(s):  
James C. Cavendish ◽  
John A. Cafeo

We view the most important question in evaluation of a computer model to be: Does the computer model provide predictions that are accurate enough for the intended use of the model? The purpose of this presentation is to discuss a systematic six-step model validation process intended to help answer that question. This will be done by presenting a Bayesian statistical strategy for developing error bounds on model predictions with the interpretation that there is a specified confidence (e.g. 80%) that the corresponding true process value will lie within the range of these error bounds. Although seldom done in practice, such error bounds and confidence estimates should be provided whenever model predictions are made. A Caveat: The process of model validation is inherently a hard statistical problem. The statistical problem is so hard that one rarely sees model validation approaches that actually produce error bounds and confidence estimates on computer model predictions. The intent of this presentation is essentially to provide a ‘proof of concept’, that it is possible to provide such bounds and estimates for predictions of computer models, while taking into account all of the uncertainties present in the problem. However, the computations required in the methodology we propose can be intensive, especially when there are large numbers of model inputs, large numbers of unknown parameters, or a large amount of data (model-run or field). The test bed application we consider in this presentation (a resistance spot weld model) is relatively modest in these dimensions. Finally, we call the reader’s attention to the reference, Bayarri et. al. (2002). This reference provides a down-loadable PDF file that contains a technical report presenting all of the technical details associated with our proposed validation strategy as well as practical application of the strategy to the spot weld model described in this presentation as well as to an automobile crash model.


Soil Research ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 179 ◽  
Author(s):  
GG Johns

The performance of several alternative evaporation functions for simulating water loss from a bare red earth was assessed by including them in a computer model which was used to simulate evaporation both from red earth monoliths in a glasshouse, and from a study site in the field. The coefficients in the different evaporation functions were also optimized to minimize the root mean square discrepancy (RMSD) between simulated and observed soil water contents. RMSD values for the alternative evaporation functions before optimization of coefficients ranged from 3.2 to 7.0 mm for the glasshouse data and from 4.0 to 6.6 mm for the field data. Optimization reduced these values 3.0 to 6.4 mm (glasshouse) and 3.9 to 6.1 mm (field). The sensitivity of the model to errors in hydraulic conductivity estimates was assessed. Overestimating hydraulic conductivity by 2 and 10 times increased predicted cumulative evaporation by 8 and 28% respectively. Underestimating conductivity by the same factors produced similar reductions in predicted cumulative evaporation. The model was used to test the effect of basing the simulation of field evaporation on different thicknesses of surface compartment, for two alternative evaporation functions. Optimum thicknesses of surface compartment were 20 and 30 cm, and increasing these thicknesses to 60 cm resulted in only c. 20% increase in RMSD. This effect was considerably less than the increase caused by using inferior alternate types of evaporation function.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document