scholarly journals Minimum capital requirement calculations for UK futures

2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Cotter
2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 22-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoyuki Yoshino ◽  
Tomohiro Hirano

This paper proposes replacing the present Basel capital requirement with a new counter-cyclical measure. Optimally, (i) the Basel capital requirement ratio should depend on various economic factors such as the cyclical stage of GDP, credit growth, stock prices, interest rates, and land prices—hence, avoiding the expansion of bank loans during a boom period and a credit crunch during a sluggish period; (ii) the Basel minimum capital requirement rule should be different from country to country since the economic structures and the behavior of banks are different; and (iii) cross-border bank operation should follow the minimum capital requirement ratio where bank lending activities occur rather than the origin of the source of funds.


2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
Marcio Holland ◽  
Guilherme Yanaka

With the implementation of Basel II Accord in Brazil, the largest banks will be allowed to use the so-called IRB (Internal Ratings Based) model to compute the credit risk capital requirement. The aim of this work is to measure the difference between the minimum capital requirement (and, thus, in the capital ratio) calculated through the IRB approach and the one defined by the current regulation. Estimates of probabilities of default (PD) were made using transition matrices constructed from the Brazilian Central Bank Credit Register (SCR) data. The results show an increase in the capital requirement, contrary to what have happened in the G-10 countries.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 255
Author(s):  
Asma' Munifatussa'idah

This study aims to analyze the significance effect of Minimum Capital Requirement (KPMM), Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR), Operating Expenses to Operations Revenue (BOPO), and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) toward Non-Performing financing (NPF) at Sharia Commercial Banks in Indonesia. This study uses analysis multiple linear regression (PLS) method. The sample in this study is the quarterly Sharia Commercial Banks (BUS) in the period of 2014-2019. The result of this study showed that KPMM, FDR, BOPO, and GDP simultaneously have a significant effect toward NPF. Partially KPMM, FDR, and BOPO have a significant effect toward NPF, and GDP partially not significant effect toward NPF in Indonesia Sharia Commercial Banks period 2014-2019.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
John Muteba Mwamba ◽  
Donovan Beytell

This paper uses closing prices of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) financial markets to implement a risk model that generates point estimates of both Value at Risk (VaR); and Expected Shortfall (ES). The risk model is thereafter backtested using three techniques namely the Basel II green zone, the unconditional test, and the conditional test. We first filter the log-return data using an Autoregressive Regression model (AR) of order one for the conditional mean and an Exponential Generalised Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity of order one (EGARCH 1,1) for the conditional variance. We thereafter fit the filtered returns by using the Generalised Pareto Distribution (GPD) model before we compute both VaR and ES estimates. We find that the use of the GPD is well suited to financial markets that are highly exposed to global financial risks. Our results show that both VaR and ES estimates for South Africa are very low when compared with those of other BRICS financial markets. We argue that South Africas credit and loan regulations, pioneered by the National Credit Regulator (NCR), might have decreased its exposure to global financial risks. The resulting minimum capital requirement values are found to be significantly different depending on whether the Variance-Covariance or the GPD methodology is used. The backtesting methodologies show that the VaR model used in the paper is more robust and practically reliable.


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 401-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Osei-Assibey ◽  
Joseph Kwadwo Asenso

Purpose – This paper aims to investigate the influence of the central bank’s regulatory capital on commercial banks specific performance outcomes such as credit supply, interest rate spread (as a measure of efficiency) and non-performing loans (NPLs). Design/methodology/approach – Using specific commercial bank-level panel data from 2002-2012, a system of equations was modeled that allows us to apply the system generalized methods of moment approach and estimate the equations, while controlling for specific bank level, industry and macroeconomic variables. Findings – The study finds a positive relationship between a net minimum capital ratio and the net interest margin. Although this is in contrast with the study expectations, the result suggests that a high net minimum capital requirement would widen the spread between the lending and saving rates. The study further finds evidence to support the fact that high minimum capital requirement and excess capital above the minimum required drive credit growth in the banking sector of Ghana. However, high excess capital increases risk-taking activities of the banks, as excess capital is found to be associated with high NPL ratios. Practical implications – Given the economic benefits and costs of sharply increasing bank regulatory capital, our results speak to the ongoing debates on the right level of capital, the effectiveness of the Bank of Ghana policy rate (PR) and the high lending rates that appear to respond only slowly to macroeconomic indicators such as the PR and the inflation rate. The finding also has practical implications for the adoption of the Basel III accord. Originality/value – The empirical literature has not paid enough attention to the impact of regulatory capital on the three specific bank-level outcomes – NPLs, interest rate spread and the nature of interrelationships among these variables, particularly in the African context.


Policy Papers ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (80) ◽  
Author(s):  

The countercyclical capital buffer (CCB) was proposed by the Basel committee to increase the resilience of the banking sector to negative shocks. The interactions between banking sector losses and the real economy highlight the importance of building a capital buffer in periods when systemic risks are rising. Basel III introduces a framework for a time-varying capital buffer on top of the minimum capital requirement and another time-invariant buffer (the conservation buffer). The CCB aims to make banks more resilient against imbalances in credit markets and thereby enhance medium-term prospects of the economy—in good times when system-wide risks are growing, the regulators could impose the CCB which would help the banks to withstand losses in bad times.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document