The Relationship of Counselor Candidates' Empathic Perception and Rapport in Small Group Interaction

1967 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 287-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Axelson
Keyword(s):  
Small Group ◽  
Group Interaction ◽  
Small Group Interaction ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

scholarly journals Accuracy and Idea Consideration: A Study of Small-Group Interaction in Biology

2022 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy R. Cavagnetto ◽  
Joshua Premo ◽  
Zachary Coleman ◽  
Kate Juergens
Keyword(s):  
Small Group ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Group Work ◽  
Group Interaction ◽  
Small Group Work ◽  
Undergraduate Biology ◽  
Small Group Interaction ◽  
Scientific Accuracy ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Biology Lab

The study examines the relationship between scientific accuracy of contributions, peer idea consideration, one’s ability to direct the conversation, and learning outcomes of students engaged in small-group work in an introductory undergraduate biology lab course.

Self-Disclosure, Participation, and Perceived Cohesiveness in Small Group Interaction

1974 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 361-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Johnson ◽  
Larry R. Ridener
Keyword(s):  
Small Group ◽  
Group Interaction ◽  
Discussion Groups ◽  
Group Cohesiveness ◽  
Same Sex ◽  
Self Disclosure ◽  
Perceived Norms ◽  
Small Group Interaction

In small, same-sex, undergraduate discussion groups ( N = 23), self-disclosure was associated significantly with perceived group cohesiveness, but not participation. Only males' self-disclosure (Jourard's questionnaire) was associated with perceived cooperation, and only females' self-disclosure was associated significantly with perceived norms and influence. Contrary to expectation, participation was associated significantly only with males' perceived group cohesiveness including perceived cooperation, ideas, norms, liking, and influence.

Technology-Supported Small Group Interaction

2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas C. Romano ◽  
Paul Benjamin Lowry ◽  
Tom L. Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Small Group ◽  
Group Interaction ◽  
Small Group Interaction

Hybrid Masculine Power: Reconceptualizing the Relationship between Homosociality and Hegemonic Masculinity

2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 390-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven L. Arxer
Keyword(s):  
Small Group ◽  
Hegemonic Masculinity ◽  
Participant Observation ◽  
Heterosexual Men ◽  
Social Setting ◽  
Hybrid Form ◽  
The Social ◽  
Alternative Masculinities ◽  
Small Group Interaction ◽  
The Relationship

Most research on heterosexual interaction among men focuses on ideologies, discourses, and practices that correspond to conventional renditions of hegemonic masculinity. Specifically, previous research suggests heterosexual men in homosocial interaction tend to suppress non-hegemonic meanings in constructing a sense of masculinity. Less attention has been given, however, to the ways in which men in homosocial settings conceptualize and negotiate with masculine ideals so as to produce a “hybrid” form of hegemonic masculinity that appropriates non-hegemonic practices. This study examines the production of hybrid hegemonic masculinity through participant observation of men in the social setting of a college bar. Results show that although men did align themselves with conventional hegemonic masculinity, they also incorporated gender practices associated with non-hegemonic masculinities. Interestingly, men often engaged in emotive sharing and preferred cooperation to competition as strategies in small group interaction for reproducing domination over women and subordinate masculinities. The argument is made that hybrid hegemonic masculinity may signal a shift in the landscape of hegemonic masculine power that increasingly appropriates alternative masculinities as a way to protect and reproduce gendered power and privilege.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document