Pharmacist‐Prescribed Hormonal Contraception Services: A Systematic Review of Implementation Studies

Author(s):  
Jenny L. Beal ◽  
Jason B. Reed ◽  
Rebecca H. Stone ◽  
Kennedi G. Satterfield ◽  
Ashley H. Meredith
Contraception ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 480-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angeline Ti ◽  
Rebecca H. Stone ◽  
Maura Whiteman ◽  
Kathryn M. Curtis

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S492-S493
Author(s):  
Amy K Drahota ◽  
Bethany E Keenan ◽  
Chantelle Lachance ◽  
Lambert Felix ◽  
James P Raftery ◽  
...  

Abstract Falls in hospitals and care homes are a major issue of international concern. Falls cost the US $34 billion a year, with injurious falls being particularly life-limiting and costly. Shock-absorbing flooring decreases the stiffness of the ground surface to reduce the impact of a fall. There is a growing body of evidence on flooring for fall-related injury prevention, however no systematic review exists to inform practice. We systematically reviewed the evidence on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of shock-absorbing flooring use for fall-related injury prevention in care settings. We searched six databases, clinical trial registries, conference proceedings, theses/dissertations, websites, reference lists, conducted forward citation searches, and liaised with experts in the field. We conducted study selection, data collection, and critical appraisal independently in duplicate. We evaluated the influence of shock-absorbing flooring on fall-related injuries, falls, and staff work-related injuries. We adopted a mixed methods approach considering evidence from randomised, non-randomised, economic, qualitative, and implementation studies. We assessed and reported the quality of outcomes using the GRADE approach and Summary of Findings Tables. This review, conducted over the course of 2019, summarises the certainty of the evidence on whether and which shock-absorbing floors influence injuries from falls, the chance of someone falling over, and work-related injuries in staff (e.g. from manoeuvring equipment across softer floors). Our findings are applicable to health and social care professionals, buildings and facilities managers, carers, older adults, architects, and designers. Funded by National Institute for Health Research, Health Technology Assessment (ref 17/148/11); registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019118834).


Contraception ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 641-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Pamela Pagano ◽  
Lauren B. Zapata ◽  
Erin N. Berry-Bibee ◽  
Kavita Nanda ◽  
Kathryn M. Curtis

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A316-A316
Author(s):  
A G Bezerra ◽  
G Pires ◽  
M L Andersen ◽  
S Tufik ◽  
H Hachul

Abstract Introduction The effects of hormonal contraceptives on sleep has been matter of debate in current literature. While some articles observed a sleep promoting effect and reduced sleep disordered breathing, others have failed to detect any result or even detected a worse sleep pattern in women using hormonal contraception. As the literature has been growing on this field, a systematic review is necessary to gather and compare all the studies in a comprehensive way. Methods A bibliographic search was conducted in Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science. Studies were selected first based on titles and abstracts, followed by full text analysis and data extraction. Only original studies evaluating women using hormonal contraception were considered eligible. Both objective and subjective sleep-related outcomes were extracted for analyzes. Individual effect size for each articles was calculated using regular or standardized mean differences and meta-analyses were conducted using a DerSimonian and Laird random effects model. Results After the bibliographic search, 1787 non-duplicated articles were included in our initial data screening. Articles sample was reduced to 114 records after abstract screening and to ten studies after full text analyses. The following sleep outcomes were eligible for meta-analysis: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI - 3 studies), total time in bed (4), subjective total sleep time (4), objective total sleep time (3), sleep latency (6), sleep efficiency (6). None of them resulted in statistically significant effects of contraceptive use and the effect size ± 95% interval of confidence overlapped the zero value. Conclusion Hormonal contraceptives is not associated to any alteration in sleep patterns in women. This conclusion should be restricted to a general framework, since our sample does not allowed stratified analyses. Future studies should consider the effect of specific hormonal composition (ex.: combined vs. progestogen-only contraceptives) and administration route (contraceptive pills vs. levonorgestrel intrauterine device). Support AFIP, CAPES, CNPq


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn M Curtis ◽  
Philip C Hannaford ◽  
Maria Isabel Rodriguez ◽  
Tsungai Chipato ◽  
Petrus S Steyn ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo update a 2016 systematic review on hormonal contraception use and HIV acquisition.MethodsWe searched Pubmed and Embase between 15 January 2016 and 26 June 2019 for longitudinal studies comparing incident HIV infection among women using a hormonal contraceptive method and either non-users or users of another specific hormonal contraceptive method. We extracted information from newly identified studies, assessed study quality, and updated forest plots and meta-analyses.ResultsIn addition to 31 previously included studies, five more were identified; three provided higher quality evidence. A randomised clinical trial (RCT) found no statistically significant differences in HIV risk among users of intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM), levonorgestrel implant (LNG implant) or the copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD). An observational study found no statistically significant differences in HIV risk among women using DMPA, norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN), implants (type not specified) or Cu-IUD. Updated results from a previously included observational study continued to find a statistically significant increased HIV risk with oral contraceptives and DMPA compared with no contraceptive use, and found no association between LNG implant and HIV risk.ConclusionsHigh-quality RCT data comparing use of DMPA, LNG implant and Cu-IUD does not support previous concerns from observational studies that DMPA-IM use increases the risk of HIV acquisition. Use of other hormonal contraceptive methods (oral contraceptives, NET-EN and implants) is not associated with an increased risk of HIV acquisition.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. e73055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lenka A. Vodstrcil ◽  
Jane S. Hocking ◽  
Matthew Law ◽  
Sandra Walker ◽  
Sepehr N. Tabrizi ◽  
...  

Contraception ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 606-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmine Nappi ◽  
Giuseppe Bifulco ◽  
Giovanni A. Tommaselli ◽  
Virginia Gargano ◽  
Costantino Di Carlo

Contraception ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 650-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi K. Tepper ◽  
Kathryn M. Curtis ◽  
Maria W. Steenland ◽  
Polly A. Marchbanks

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 709-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Champaneria ◽  
Ruben Mamprin D’Andrea ◽  
Pallavi M. Latthe

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document