Hormonal contraception and bone metabolism: a systematic review

Contraception ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 606-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmine Nappi ◽  
Giuseppe Bifulco ◽  
Giovanni A. Tommaselli ◽  
Virginia Gargano ◽  
Costantino Di Carlo
Contraception ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 480-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angeline Ti ◽  
Rebecca H. Stone ◽  
Maura Whiteman ◽  
Kathryn M. Curtis

Contraception ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 641-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Pamela Pagano ◽  
Lauren B. Zapata ◽  
Erin N. Berry-Bibee ◽  
Kavita Nanda ◽  
Kathryn M. Curtis

2021 ◽  
Vol 711 ◽  
pp. 109020
Author(s):  
Kun Zhang ◽  
Xuening Liu ◽  
Lifu Wang ◽  
Zhongcheng Liu ◽  
Qiong Yi ◽  
...  

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A316-A316
Author(s):  
A G Bezerra ◽  
G Pires ◽  
M L Andersen ◽  
S Tufik ◽  
H Hachul

Abstract Introduction The effects of hormonal contraceptives on sleep has been matter of debate in current literature. While some articles observed a sleep promoting effect and reduced sleep disordered breathing, others have failed to detect any result or even detected a worse sleep pattern in women using hormonal contraception. As the literature has been growing on this field, a systematic review is necessary to gather and compare all the studies in a comprehensive way. Methods A bibliographic search was conducted in Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science. Studies were selected first based on titles and abstracts, followed by full text analysis and data extraction. Only original studies evaluating women using hormonal contraception were considered eligible. Both objective and subjective sleep-related outcomes were extracted for analyzes. Individual effect size for each articles was calculated using regular or standardized mean differences and meta-analyses were conducted using a DerSimonian and Laird random effects model. Results After the bibliographic search, 1787 non-duplicated articles were included in our initial data screening. Articles sample was reduced to 114 records after abstract screening and to ten studies after full text analyses. The following sleep outcomes were eligible for meta-analysis: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI - 3 studies), total time in bed (4), subjective total sleep time (4), objective total sleep time (3), sleep latency (6), sleep efficiency (6). None of them resulted in statistically significant effects of contraceptive use and the effect size ± 95% interval of confidence overlapped the zero value. Conclusion Hormonal contraceptives is not associated to any alteration in sleep patterns in women. This conclusion should be restricted to a general framework, since our sample does not allowed stratified analyses. Future studies should consider the effect of specific hormonal composition (ex.: combined vs. progestogen-only contraceptives) and administration route (contraceptive pills vs. levonorgestrel intrauterine device). Support AFIP, CAPES, CNPq


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn M Curtis ◽  
Philip C Hannaford ◽  
Maria Isabel Rodriguez ◽  
Tsungai Chipato ◽  
Petrus S Steyn ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo update a 2016 systematic review on hormonal contraception use and HIV acquisition.MethodsWe searched Pubmed and Embase between 15 January 2016 and 26 June 2019 for longitudinal studies comparing incident HIV infection among women using a hormonal contraceptive method and either non-users or users of another specific hormonal contraceptive method. We extracted information from newly identified studies, assessed study quality, and updated forest plots and meta-analyses.ResultsIn addition to 31 previously included studies, five more were identified; three provided higher quality evidence. A randomised clinical trial (RCT) found no statistically significant differences in HIV risk among users of intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM), levonorgestrel implant (LNG implant) or the copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD). An observational study found no statistically significant differences in HIV risk among women using DMPA, norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN), implants (type not specified) or Cu-IUD. Updated results from a previously included observational study continued to find a statistically significant increased HIV risk with oral contraceptives and DMPA compared with no contraceptive use, and found no association between LNG implant and HIV risk.ConclusionsHigh-quality RCT data comparing use of DMPA, LNG implant and Cu-IUD does not support previous concerns from observational studies that DMPA-IM use increases the risk of HIV acquisition. Use of other hormonal contraceptive methods (oral contraceptives, NET-EN and implants) is not associated with an increased risk of HIV acquisition.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Dolan ◽  
A. Dumas ◽  
K. M. Keane ◽  
G. Bestetti ◽  
L. H. M. Freitas ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Bone is a plastic tissue that is responsive to its physical environment. As a result, exercise interventions represent a potential means to influence the bone. However, little is currently known about how various exercise and participant characteristics interact to influence bone metabolism. Acute, controlled, interventions provide an in vivo model through which the acute bone response to exercise can be investigated, typically by monitoring circulating bone biomarkers. Currently, substantial heterogeneity in factors such as study design, quality, exercise, and participant characteristics render it difficult to synthesize and evaluate the available evidence. Using a systematic review and meta-analytic approach, the aim of this investigation is to quantify the effect of an acute exercise bout on circulating bone biomarkers as well as examine the potential factors that may moderate this response, e.g., variation in participant, exercise, and sampling characteristics. Methods This protocol was designed in accordance with the PRISMA-P guidelines. Seven databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Sport Discus, Cochrane CENTRAL, PEDro, LILACS, and Ibec) will be systematically searched and supplemented by a secondary screening of the reference lists of all included articles. The PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes and Study Design) approach was used to guide the determination of the eligibility criteria. Participants of any age, sex, training, or health status will be considered for inclusion. We will select studies that have measured the bone biomarker response before and after an acute exercise session. All biomarkers considered to represent the bone metabolism will be considered for inclusion, and sensitivity analyses will be conducted using reference biomarkers for the measurement of bone resorption and formation (namely β-CTX-1 and P1NP). Multi-level, meta-regression models within a Bayesian framework will be used to explore the main effect of acute exercise on bone biomarkers as well as potential moderating factors. The risk of bias for each individual study will be evaluated using a modified version of the Downs and Black checklist while certainty in resultant outcomes will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Discussion A better understanding of the bone metabolic response to an acute bout of exercise has the potential to advance our understanding of the mechanisms through which this stimulus impacts bone metabolism, including factors that may moderate this response. Additionally, we will identify current gaps in the evidence base and provide recommendations to inform future research. Systematic review registration This protocol was prospectively registered in the Open Science Framework Registry (https://osf.io/6f8dz)


PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. e73055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lenka A. Vodstrcil ◽  
Jane S. Hocking ◽  
Matthew Law ◽  
Sandra Walker ◽  
Sepehr N. Tabrizi ◽  
...  

BMC Urology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ary Serpa Neto ◽  
Marcos Tobias-Machado ◽  
Marcos AP Esteves ◽  
Marília D Senra ◽  
Marcelo L Wroclawski ◽  
...  

Contraception ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 650-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi K. Tepper ◽  
Kathryn M. Curtis ◽  
Maria W. Steenland ◽  
Polly A. Marchbanks

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 709-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Champaneria ◽  
Ruben Mamprin D’Andrea ◽  
Pallavi M. Latthe

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document