scholarly journals Gastroesophageal varices evaluation using spleen‐dedicated stiffness measurement by vibration‐controlled transient elastography

JGH Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koki Nagai ◽  
Yuji Ogawa ◽  
Takashi Kobayashi ◽  
Michihiro Iwaki ◽  
Asako Nogami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transient Elastography ◽  
Gastroesophageal Varices ◽  
Stiffness Measurement

scholarly journals “SPLEEN STIFFNESS MEASUREMENT IN LIVER CIRRHOSIS PATIENTS FOR NONINVASIVE ASSESSMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL VARICES USING FIBROSCAN”

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Revathy Marimuthu Shanmugam ◽  
Vinay C ◽  
Sathya Gopalasamy ◽  
Chitra Shanmugam
Keyword(s):  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Esophageal Varix ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Transient Elastography ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Stiffness Measurement ◽  
Spleen Stiffness ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients

BACKGROUND: Many noninvasive surrogate marker for Portal hypertension or for the presence or grade of esophageal varices were studied..Splenomegaly along with splenic congestion secondary to splenic hyperdynamic circulation is seen secondary to Portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients that can be quantified by elastography. AIM:The aim of this study was to investigate whether spleen stiffness, assessed by TE, useful tool for grading chronic liver diseases and to compare its performance in predicting the presence and size of esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis patients. METHODOLOGY:86 patients with cirrhosis and 80 controls underwent transient elastography of liver and spleen for the assessment of liver stiffness (LSM) and spleen stiffness (SSM) . Upper GI endoscopy done in all Cirrhotic patients. RESULTS: Spleen stiffness showed higher values in liver cirrhosis patients as compared with controls: 58.2 kpa vs14.8 kpa (P < 0.0001) and also found to be significantly higher in cirrhotic patients compared with varices and those without varices (69.01 vs 42.05 kpa, P < 0.0001). Liver stiffness was also found to be higher in cirrhotic patients with varices when compared to patients without varices (38.5vs 21.2 kpa). Using both liver and spleen stiffness measurement we can predicted the presence of esophageal varices correctly. CONCLUSION: Spleen stiffness can be assessed using transient elastography, higher value correlated well with liver cirrhosis and presence of esophageal varices although it couldn’t correlate with grade of Esophageal Varix. Combined assessment of spleen and liver stiffness had better prediction of presence of Esophageal Varix.

scholarly journals Liver stiffness in chronic hepatitis C virus infection

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-98
Author(s):  
Romeo-Gabriel Mihăilă
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Hepatitis ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Liver Fibrosis ◽  
Chronic Hepatitis C ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Transient Elastography ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
Shear Wave Elastography ◽  
Stiffness Measurement ◽  
A Value

Abstract Introduction. The severity of liver fibrosis can be assessed noninvasively today by liver stiffness measurements. Vibration-controlled transient elastography, shear wave elastography or magnetic resonance elastography are techniques increasingly used for this purpose. Methods. This article presents the recent advances in the use of new techniques for liver fibrosis assessment in chronic hepatitis C: the correlation between liver stiffness values and liver fibrosis estimated by liver biopsies, the prognosis role of liver stiffness values, their usefulness in monitoring the treatment response, in assessing the severity of portal hypertension and in estimating the presence of esophageal varices. Scientific articles from January 2017 to January 2018 were searched in PubMed and PubMed Central databases, using the terms “liver stiffness” and “hepatitis C”. Results. The median liver stiffness values measured with different techniques are not identical, so that FibroScan thresholds cannot be used on any other elastographic machine. The higher the liver’s stiffness measurement, the higher the liver-related events in patients with chronic hepatitis C. A liver stiffness measurement over 17 kPa could be an independent predictor for the presence of esophageal varices as well as a spleen with a longitudinal span ≥ 15 cm for patients with a value of liver stiffness < 17 kPa. A progressive and persistent decrease in liver stiffness is dependent on sustained virological response achievement. The lack of liver stiffness decrease has been associated with relapsers and a low value of liver stiffness at baseline. Conclusion. Liver stiffness provides clues about the severity and evolution of liver disease.

Unified interpretation of liver stiffness measurement by M and XL probes in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Gut ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (11) ◽  
pp. 2057-2064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Wai-Sun Wong ◽  
Marie Irles ◽  
Grace Lai-Hung Wong ◽  
Sarah Shili ◽  
Anthony Wing-Hung Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Disease ◽  
Fatty Liver ◽  
Fatty Liver Disease ◽  
Transient Elastography ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
The Body ◽  
Liver Stiffness Measurement ◽  
Alcoholic Fatty Liver ◽  
Stiffness Measurement ◽  
Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

ObjectiveThe latest model of vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) automatically selects M or XL probe according to patients’ body built. We aim to test the application of a unified interpretation of VCTE results with probes appropriate for the body mass index (BMI) and hypothesise that this approach is not affected by hepatic steatosis.DesignWe prospectively recruited 496 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease who underwent VCTE by both M and XL probes within 1 week before liver biopsy.Results391 (78.8%) and 433 (87.3%) patients had reliable liver stiffness measurement (LSM) (10 successful acquisitions and IQR:median ratio ≤0.30) by M and XL probes, respectively (p<0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves was similar between the two probes (0.75–0.88 for F2–4, 0.83–0.91 for F4). When used in the same patient, LSM by XL probe was lower than that by M probe (mean difference 2.3 kPa). In contrast, patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m2 had higher LSM regardless of the probe used. When M and XL probes were used in patients with BMI <30 and ≥30 kg/m2, respectively, they yielded nearly identical median LSM at each fibrosis stage and similar diagnostic performance. Severe steatosis did not increase LSM or the rate of false-positive diagnosis by XL probe.ConclusionHigh BMI but not severe steatosis increases LSM. The same LSM cut-offs can be used without further adjustment for steatosis when M and XL probes are used according to the appropriate BMI.

Liver Stiffness Measurement by Transient Elastography as a Predictor on Posthepatectomy Outcomes

2013 ◽  
Vol 257 (5) ◽  
pp. 922-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Siu-Wang Wong ◽  
Grace Lai-Hung Wong ◽  
Anthony Wing-Hung Chan ◽  
Vincent Wai-Sun Wong ◽  
Yue-Sun Cheung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transient Elastography ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
Liver Stiffness Measurement ◽  
Stiffness Measurement
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document