A field study of group diversity, participation in diversity education programs, and performance

2004 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 755-780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin J. Ely
2004 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 703-729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen A. Jehn ◽  
Katerina Bezrukova

2022 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Melonie B. Murray ◽  
Steven Ross Murray

This article traces the development of dance as an academic discipline from its infancy in physical education programs to its present state, noting the significance of the burgeoning field of dance science and how it is a catalyst for the reconnecting of dance to physical education. The academic discipline of dance originated in the early 20th century in American academe, particularly in women’s physical education programs. By the 1920s, dance emerged as a discrete discipline with Margaret H’Doubler’s founding of the first baccalaureate degree in dance at the University of Wisconsin. By the 1960s, the academic discipline of dance had shifted from its original mission of movement education for everyone to focus more on professional dance training for highly skilled performers. This philosophical shift saw many dance programs move from homes in physical education to the fine arts. During this time, dance also saw an increasing disciplinary emphasis on choreographic and performance projects, a trend still evident today. Dance science began to develop as an academic field in the early 1980s, and shortly after publications and conferences in the area were born. The professional association the International Association for Dance Medicine and Science was founded in 1990. With dance science’s emergence, dance and physical education began to realign, albeit often in departments of kinesiology. Today, with the development of dance science as a burgeoning field, dance and kinesiology are coming full circle, rejoining through their historical roots.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
M. Ringenier ◽  
N. Caekebeke ◽  
F. De Meyer ◽  
T. Van Limbergen ◽  
V. Eeckhaut ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 341-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
ARUP VARMA ◽  
ANGELO S. DENISI ◽  
LAWRENCE H. PETERS

Author(s):  
Christina G. L. Nerstad ◽  
Sut I Wong ◽  
Astrid M. Richardsen

In this study, we propose that when employees become too engaged, they may become burnt out due to resource depletion. We further suggest that this negative outcome is contingent upon the perceived motivational psychological climate (mastery and performance climates) at work. A two-wave field study of 1081 employees revealed an inverted U-shaped relationship between work engagement and burnout. This finding suggests that employees with too much work engagement may be exposed to a higher risk of burnout. Further, a performance climate, with its emphasis on social comparison, may enhance—and a mastery climate, which focuses on growth, cooperation and effort, may mitigate the likelihood that employees become cynical towards work—an important dimension of burnout.


2012 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 70-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve W. Peyton ◽  
Chris L. Sanders ◽  
Emerson E. John ◽  
W. Micah Hale

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document