The size of regional lymph nodes does not correlate with the presence or absence of metastasis in lymph nodes in rectal cancer

1993 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 252-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hitoshi Kotanagi ◽  
Takemi Fukuoka ◽  
Yutaka Shibata ◽  
Toshiaki Yoshioka ◽  
Osamu Aizawa ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. e27402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiane Jakob ◽  
Daniela E. Aust ◽  
Birgit Liebscher ◽  
Gustavo B. Baretton ◽  
Kaustubh Datta ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 1062-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideki Ueno ◽  
Hidetaka Mochizuki ◽  
Kazuo Hase ◽  
Toshihiko Yagyuu ◽  
Kazuyoshi Yoshimura ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinyue Yang ◽  
Yan Chen ◽  
Ziqiang Wen ◽  
Yiyan Liu ◽  
Xiaojuan Xiao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The aim of this study is to evaluate the microstructure and microcirculation of regional lymph nodes (LNs) in rectal cancer by using non-invasive intravoxel incoherent motion MRI (IVIM-MRI), and to distinguish metastatic from non-metastatic LNs by quantitative parameters. Methods All recruited patients underwent IVIM-MRI (b = 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 60, 80, 100, 150, 200, 400, 600, 1000, 1500 and 2000 s/mm2) on a 3.0 T MRI system. One hundred sixty-eight regional LNs with a short-axis diameter equal to or greater than 5 mm from 116 patients were evaluated by two radiologists independently, including 78 malignant LNs and 90 benign LNs. The following parameters were assessed: the short-axis diameter (S), long-axis diameter (L), short- to long-axis diameter ratio (S/L), pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion factor (f). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to assess the interobserver agreement between two readers. Receiver operating characteristic curves were applied for analyzing statistically significant parameters. Results Interobserver agreement of IVIM-MRI parameters between two readers was excellent (ICCs> 0.75). The metastatic group exhibited higher S, L and D (P < 0.001), but lower f (P < 0.001) than the non-metastatic group. The area under the curve (95% CI, sensitivity, specificity) of the multi-parameter combined equation for D, f and S was 0.811 (0.744~0.868, 62.82%, 87.78%). The diagnostic performance of the multi-parameter model was better than that of an individual parameter (P < 0.05). Conclusion IVIM-MRI parameters provided information about the microstructure and microcirculation of regional LNs in rectal cancer, also improved diagnostic performance in identifying metastatic LNs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 886-894
Author(s):  
Donghua Wang ◽  
Manyu Chen ◽  
Long Lv ◽  
Yu Chen ◽  
Kui Tian

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cause of cancer-related death in the world because of its poor prognosis and many related complications. In clinical practice, lymph node metastasis is an important index to evaluate the recurrence and survival rate of patients with rectal cancer, it also the main method to determine the treatment plan of patients with rectal cancer. Nano carbon tracer can guide surgeons to clear regional lymph nodes accurately, improve the number of lymph nodes detected, and then improve the accuracy of pathological staging of rectal cancer. It has an important clinical significance in the removal of lymph nodes of middle and low rectal cancer, and provides an important basis for the development of postoperative adjuvant treatment plan. The purpose of this study is to explore the application value of this method in improving the detection rate of lymph nodes in laparoscopic colorectal cancer. According to the research results, the total number of lymphatic gland, the number of small lymphatic gland, the rate of lymph node metastasis, the number of black stained lymphatic gland and the number of lymphatic gland confirmed by pathology in the two groups were better than those in the traditional surgical treatment, which had better application value in the radical operation of colorectal cancer.


2008 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 256-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Simunovic ◽  
A.J. Smith ◽  
R.J. Heald

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsuru Ishizuka ◽  
Hitoshi Nagata ◽  
Kazutoshi Takagi ◽  
Yoshimi Iwasaki ◽  
Keiichi Kubota

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document