scholarly journals A New Assessment of Soil Loss Due to Wind Erosion in European Agricultural Soils Using a Quantitative Spatially Distributed Modelling Approach

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 335-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Borrelli ◽  
E. Lugato ◽  
L. Montanarella ◽  
P. Panagos
1983 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1758-1765 ◽  
Author(s):  
George W. Cole ◽  
Leon Lyles ◽  
Lawrence J. Hagen

Land ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 974
Author(s):  
Simon Scheper ◽  
Thomas Weninger ◽  
Barbara Kitzler ◽  
Lenka Lackóová ◽  
Wim Cornelis ◽  
...  

Various large-scale risk maps show that the eastern part of Austria, in particular the Pannonian Basin, is one of the regions in Europe most vulnerable to wind erosion. However, comprehensive assessments of the severity and the extent of wind erosion risk are still lacking for this region. This study aimed to prove the results of large-scale maps by developing high-resolution maps of wind erosion risk for the target area. For this, we applied a qualitative soil erosion assessment (DIN 19706) with lower data requirements and a more data-demanding revised wind erosion equation (RWEQ) within a GIS application to evaluate the process of assessing wind erosion risk. Both models defined similar risk areas, although the assignment of severity classes differed. Most agricultural fields in the study area were classified as not at risk to wind erosion (DIN 19706), whereas the mean annual soil loss rate modeled by RWEQ was 3.7 t ha−1 yr−1. August was the month with the highest modeled soil loss (average of 0.49 t ha−1 month−1), due to a low percentage of vegetation cover and a relatively high weather factor combining wind speed and soil moisture effects. Based on the results, DIN 19706 is suitable for a general classification of wind erosion-prone areas, while RWEQ can derive additional information such as seasonal distribution and soil loss rates besides the spatial extents of wind erosion.


2018 ◽  
Vol 173 ◽  
pp. 60-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.-A. Versini ◽  
N. Kotelnikova ◽  
A. Poulhes ◽  
I. Tchiguirinskaia ◽  
D. Schertzer ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Colleoni ◽  
Catherine Fouchier ◽  
Pierre-André Garambois ◽  
Pierre Javelle ◽  
Maxime Jay-Allemand ◽  
...  

<p>In France, flash floods are responsible for a significant proportion of damages caused by natural hazards, either human or material. Hence, advanced modeling tools are needed to perform effective predictions. However for mountainous catchments snow modeling components may be required to correctly simulate river discharge.</p><p>This contribution investigates the implementation and constrain of snow components in the spatially distributed SMASH* platform (Jay-Allemand et al. 2020). The goal is to upgrade model structure and spatially distributed calibration strategies for snow-influenced catchments, as well as to investigate parametric sensitivity and equifinality issues. First, the implementation of snow modules of varying complexity is addressed based on Cemaneige (Valery et al. 2010) in the spatially distributed framework. Next, tests are performed on a sample of 55 catchments in the French North Alps. Numerical experiments and global sensitivity analysis enable to determine pertinent combinations of flow components (including a slow flow one) and calibration parameters. Spatially uniform or distributed calibrations using a variational method (Jay-Allemand 2020) are performed and compared on the dataset, for different model structures and constrains. These tests show critical improvements in outlet discharge modeling by adding slow flow and snow modules, especially considering spatially varying parameters. Current and future works focus on testing and improving the constrains of snow modules and calibration strategy, as well as potential validation and multiobjective calibration with snow signatures gained from in situ or satellite data. </p><p>*SMASH: Spatially-distributed Modelling and ASsimilation for Hydrology, platform developped by INRAE-Hydris corp. for operational applications in the french flood forecast system VigicruesFlash</p>


CATENA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 182 ◽  
pp. 104144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shivesh Kishore Karan ◽  
Somaparna Ghosh ◽  
Sukha Ranjan Samadder

Geoderma ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 137 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 226-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.O. Adekalu ◽  
D.A. Okunade ◽  
J.A. Osunbitan

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (23) ◽  
pp. 3579-3592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoqiang Wang ◽  
Hong Jiang ◽  
Zongxue Xu ◽  
Lijing Wang ◽  
Weifeng Yue

CATENA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 149 ◽  
pp. 770-781 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Borrelli ◽  
P. Panagos ◽  
M. Märker ◽  
S. Modugno ◽  
B. Schütt

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document