Methods of monitoring thermal ablation of soft tissue tumors – a comprehensive review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rory Geoghegan ◽  
Gail ter Haar ◽  
Kathryn Nightingale ◽  
Leonard Marks ◽  
Shyam Natarajan
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Thermal Ablation ◽  
Soft Tissue Tumors ◽  
Comprehensive Review

Localization of Gallium-67 in Peritoneal Cells by Electron Microscopic Autoradiography

1973 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 404-405
Author(s):  
D. C. Swartzendruber ◽  
Norma L. Idoyaga-Vargas
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Tumor Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Tumors ◽  
Clinical Usefulness ◽  
Electron Microscopic ◽  
Normal Cells ◽  
Electron Microscopic Autoradiography ◽  
Peritoneal Cells ◽  
Gallium 67

The radionuclide gallium-67 (67Ga) localizes preferentially but not specifically in many human and experimental soft-tissue tumors. Because of this localization, 67Ga is used in clinical trials to detect humar. cancers by external scintiscanning methods. However, the fact that 67Ga does not localize specifically in tumors requires for its eventual clinical usefulness a fuller understanding of the mechanisms that control its deposition in both malignant and normal cells. We have previously reported that 67Ga localizes in lysosomal-like bodies, notably, although not exclusively, in macrophages of the spocytaneous AKR thymoma. Further studies on the uptake of 67Ga by macrophages are needed to determine whether there are factors related to malignancy that might alter the localization of 67Ga in these cells and thus provide clues to discovering the mechanism of 67Ga localization in tumor tissue.

Benign Skin and Soft-Tissue Tumors of the Hand

1987 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 403-412
Author(s):  
Saleh M. Shenaq
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Tumors ◽  
Tumors Of The Hand

Percutaneous Imaging-Guided versus Open Musculoskeletal Biopsy: Concepts and Controversies

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (06) ◽  
pp. 667-675
Author(s):  
Violeta Vasilevska Nikodinovska ◽  
Slavcho Ivanoski ◽  
Milan Samardziski ◽  
Vesna Janevska
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Core Needle Biopsy ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Needle Biopsy ◽  
Soft Tissue Tumors ◽  
Open Biopsy ◽  
Core Needle ◽  
Similar Accuracy

AbstractBone and soft tissue tumors are a largely heterogeneous group of tumors. Biopsy of musculoskeletal (MSK) tumors is sometimes a challenging procedure. Although the open biopsy is still considered the gold standard for the biopsy of MSK lesions, core needle biopsy can replace it in most cases, with similar accuracy and a low complication rate. The biopsy should be performed in a tertiary sarcoma center where the multidisciplinary team consists of at minimum a tumor surgeon, an MSK pathologist, and an MSK radiologist who can assess all steps of the procedure. Several factors can influence the success of the biopsy including the lesion characteristics, the equipment, and the method used for the procedure. This review highlights some of the important aspects regarding the biopsy of the MSK tumors, with special attention to imaging a guided core needle biopsy and highlighting some of the recent advancements and controversies in the field.

Evaluation of Lipomatous Soft Tissue Tumors by MR Imaging

1994 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 367-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gelineck ◽  
J. Keller ◽  
O. Myhre Jensen ◽  
O. Steen Nielsen ◽  
T. Christensen
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Mr Imaging ◽  
Soft Tissue Tumors

Diagnostic Imaging of Fetal and Neonatal Abdominal and Soft Tissue Tumors

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Usha D. Nagaraj ◽  
Beth M. Kline-Fath
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Diagnostic Imaging ◽  
Soft Tissue Tumors

Imaging of soft tissue tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinji Tsukamoto ◽  
Andreas F. Mavrogenis ◽  
Yasuhito Tanaka ◽  
Costantino Errani
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Soft Tissue Tumors ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Benign Soft Tissue Tumors ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy

: Differentiation of malignant from benign soft tissue tumors is challenging with imaging alone, including that by magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. However, the accuracy of this differentiation has increased owing to the development of novel imaging technology. Detailed patient history and physical examination remain essential for differentiation between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors. Moreover, measurement only of tumor size based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors criteria is insufficient for the evaluation of response to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Change in metabolic activity measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography or dynamic contrast enhanced-derived quantitative endpoints can more accurately evaluate treatment response compared to change in tumor size. Magnetic resonance imaging can accurately evaluate essential factors in surgical planning such as vascular or bone invasion and “tail sign”. Thus, imaging plays a critical role in the diagnosis and treatment of soft tissue tumors.

h-Caldesmon as a specific marker of smooth muscle cell differentiation in some soft tissue tumors of the skin

2002 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 426-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen F. D'Addario ◽  
Michael Morgan ◽  
Lori Talley ◽  
Bruce R. Smoller
Keyword(s):  
Smooth Muscle ◽  
Cell Differentiation ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Smooth Muscle Cell ◽  
Muscle Cell ◽  
Soft Tissue Tumors ◽  
Specific Marker ◽  
Muscle Cell Differentiation ◽  
Smooth Muscle Cell Differentiation

scholarly journals Prevalence of Psychological Distress and Its Risk Factors in Patients with Primary Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 566
Author(s):  
Masato Ise ◽  
Eiji Nakata ◽  
Yoshimi Katayama ◽  
Masanori Hamada ◽  
Toshiyuki Kunisada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Soft Tissue Tumors ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Primary Bone ◽  
Associated Risk Factors ◽  
Numeric Rating

Psychological distress is common in patients with soft tissue and bone tumors. We first investigated its frequency and the associated risk factors in patients with pre-operative bone and soft tissue tumors. Participants included 298 patients with bone and soft tissue tumors who underwent surgery in our institution between 2015 and 2020. Psychological distress was evaluated by the Distress and Impact Thermometer (DIT) that consists of two types of questions (questions about the severity of the patient’s distress (DIT-D) and its impact (DIT-I)). We used a cut-off point of 4 on the DIT-D and 3 on the DIT-I for screening patients with psychological distress. We therefore investigated: (1) the prevalence of psychological distress as assessed with DIT or distress thermometer (DT), which can be decided by DIT-D ≥ 4, (2) what are the risk factors for the prevalence of psychological distress, and (3) what is the number of patients who consulted a psychiatrist for psychological distress in patients with pre-operative bone and soft tissue tumors. With DIT and DT, we identified 64 patients (21%) and 95 patients (32%), respectively, with psychological distress. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that older age, sex (female), malignancy (malignant or intermediate tumor), a lower Barthel Index, and higher numeric rating scale were risk factors for psychological distress. Two patients (3%) consulted a psychiatrist after surgery. In conclusion, careful attention to psychological distress is needed, especially for female patients, older patients, and those with malignant soft or bone tissue tumors who have more than moderate pain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document