Lidocaine gel should be more effective in reducing urethral pain during urodynamic study in men

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 454-455
Author(s):  
Senming Zhao ◽  
Yanxin Cheng ◽  
Ran Duan ◽  
Yongxue Chen ◽  
Hong Li
Keyword(s):  
Urodynamic Study ◽  
Lidocaine Gel ◽  
Urethral Pain

Liquid paraffin is superior to 2% lidocaine gel in reducing urethral pain during urodynamic study in men: A pilot study

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 450-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kobi Stav ◽  
Eyal Taleb ◽  
Itay M. Sabler ◽  
Yoram I. Siegel ◽  
Ilia Beberashvili ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Liquid Paraffin ◽  
Urodynamic Study ◽  
Lidocaine Gel ◽  
Urethral Pain

scholarly journals Efficacy of urination in alleviating man’s urethral pain associated with flexible cystoscopy : a single-center randomized trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingwei Xie ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Wei Yan ◽  
Dan Liu ◽  
Yuexin Liu
Keyword(s):  
Test Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Flexible Cystoscopy ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Examination Time ◽  
Lower Pain ◽  
Lidocaine Gel ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Urethral Pain

Abstract Objective: This study aimed to assess whether urethral pain can be alleviated by urination in male patients undergoing flexible cystoscopy. Patient and Methods: Ninety-six male outpatients undergoing flexible cystoscopy were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in the test group urinated during flexible cystoscopy, whilst patients in the control group received no instructions to do so. All patients received 10mL of 2% lidocaine gel prior to assessment. Using 0 (no-pain) to 10 (unbearable severe pain) pain scores (VAS), we assessed patient discomfort prior to anesthesia gel perfusion (baseline), during gel perfusion, during cystoscope insertion through the urethra, and 15minutes post-examination analysis. The entire protocol was completed by a single doctor in our Department of Urology. Results: The groups showed no statistical differences regarding age or examination time. During cystoscope insertion, the test group recorded significantly lower pain scores 2 (IQR 1-3) - compared to the control group 3 (IQR 2-3) , (P = 0.001). No significant differences between other evaluation points were observed between groups. Conclusion: Urethral pain can be significantly alleviated by urination in male patients undergoing flexible cystoscopy through the urethra.

scholarly journals Efficacy of urination in alleviating urethral pain associated with flexible cystoscopy - a single-center randomized trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingwei Xie ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Wei Yan ◽  
Dan Liu ◽  
Yuexin Liu
Keyword(s):  
Test Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Flexible Cystoscopy ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Examination Time ◽  
Lower Pain ◽  
Lidocaine Gel ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Urethral Pain

Abstract Objective: This study aimed to assess whether urethral pain can be alleviated by urination in male patients undergoing flexible cystoscopy. Patient and Methods: Ninety-six male outpatients undergoing flexible cystoscopy were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in the test group urinated during flexible cystoscopy, whilst patients in the control group received no instructions to do so. All patients received 10mL of 2% lidocaine gel prior to assessment. Using 0 (no-pain) to 10 (unbearable severe pain) pain scores (VAS), we assessed patient discomfort prior to anesthesia gel perfusion (baseline), during gel perfusion, during cystoscope insertion through the urethra, and 15minutes post-examination analysis. The entire protocol was completed by a single doctor in our Department of Urology. Results: The groups showed no statistical differences regarding age or examination time. During cystoscope insertion, the test group recorded significantly lower pain scores 2 (IQR 1-3) - compared to the control group 3 (IQR 2-3) , (P = 0.001). No significant differences between other evaluation points were observed between groups. Conclusion: Urethral pain can be significantly alleviated by urination in male patients undergoing flexible cystoscopy through the urethra.

scholarly journals Efficacy of urination in alleviating man’s urethral pain associated with flexible cystoscopy : a single-center randomized trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingwei Xie ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Wei Yan ◽  
Dan Liu ◽  
Yuexin Liu
Keyword(s):  
Test Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Flexible Cystoscopy ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Examination Time ◽  
Lower Pain ◽  
Lidocaine Gel ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Urethral Pain

Abstract Objective: This study aimed to assess whether urethral pain can be alleviated by urination in male patients undergoing flexible cystoscopy. Patient and Methods: Ninety-six male outpatients undergoing flexible cystoscopy were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in the test group urinated during flexible cystoscopy, whilst patients in the control group received no instructions to do so. All patients received 10mL of 2% lidocaine gel prior to assessment. Using 0 (no-pain) to 10 (unbearable severe pain) pain scores (VAS), we assessed patient discomfort prior to anesthesia gel perfusion (baseline), during gel perfusion, during cystoscope insertion through the urethra, and 15minutes post-examination analysis. The entire protocol was completed by a single doctor in our Department of Urology. Results: The groups showed no statistical differences regarding age or examination time. During cystoscope insertion, the test group recorded significantly lower pain scores 2 (IQR 1-3) - compared to the control group 3 (IQR 2-3) , (P = 0.001). No significant differences between other evaluation points were observed between groups. Conclusion: Urethral pain can be significantly alleviated by urination in male patients undergoing flexible cystoscopy through the urethra.

scholarly journals Effect of Preoperative Urodynamic Study on Urinary Outcomes after Transobturator Sling

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Rincon Cintra da Cruz ◽  
Aderivaldo Cabral Dias Filho ◽  
Gabriel Nardi Furtado ◽  
Rhaniellen Silva Ferreira ◽  
Ceres Nunes Resende
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Stress Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Urinary Continence ◽  
Urodynamic Study ◽  
Transobturator Sling ◽  
Continence Status ◽  
And Performance

Abstract Objective To evaluate whether performing preoperative urodynamic study influences postoperative urinary symptoms of women with stress urinary incontinence that underwent transobturator sling. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients treated for stress urinary incontinence by transobturator sling from August 2011 to October 2018. Predictor variables included preoperative urodynamic study, age, incontinence severity, body mass index, preoperative storage symptoms and previous anti-urinary incontinence procedure. Outcome variables were postoperative subjective continence status, storage symptoms and complications. Logistic regression after propensity score was employed to compare outcomes between patients who underwent or not pre-operative urodynamic study. Results The present study included 88 patients with an average follow-up of 269 days. Most patients (n = 52; 59.1%) described storage symptoms other than stress urinary incontinence, and 38 patients (43.2%) underwent preoperative urodynamic studies. Logistic regression after propensity score did not reveal an association between urinary continence outcomes and performance of preoperative urodynamic study (odds ratio 0.57; confidence interval [CI]: 0.11–2.49). Among women that did not undergo urodynamic study, there was a subjective improvement in urinary incontinence in 92% of the cases versus 87% in those that underwent urodynamic study (p = 0.461). Furthermore, postoperative storage symptoms were similar between women who did not undergo urodynamic study and those who underwent urodynamic study, 13.2% versus 18.4%, respectively (p = 0.753). Conclusion Preoperative urodynamic study had no impact on urinary incontinence cure outcomes as well as on urinary storage symptoms after the transobturator sling in women with stress urinary incontinence.

scholarly journals Paraurethral Leiomyoma in a Postmenopausal Woman: First European Case

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susy Shim ◽  
Camilla Skovvang Borg ◽  
Huda Galib Majeed ◽  
Peter Humaidan
Keyword(s):  
Smooth Muscle ◽  
Postmenopausal Woman ◽  
Smooth Muscle Cells ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Transvaginal Ultrasound ◽  
Reproductive Age ◽  
Benign Tumors ◽  
Gynecological Examination ◽  
Urethral Pain ◽  
Paraurethral Leiomyoma

Leiomyomas are benign tumors extending from smooth muscle cells and only few cases of paraurethral leiomyomas have been described in the literature. They are often seen in the reproductive age and around 50% of the cases are asymptomatic. We describe a 59-year-old woman with a solid mobile tumor below the symphysis revealed at a gynecological examination. Transvaginal ultrasound and MRI confirmed the tumor and excision of the paraurethral tumor was carried out. The histological examination showed a benign paraurethral leiomyoma. The postoperative period was characterized by urethral pain as well as vaginal leakage of urine.

Urodynamic study alterations in a patient with stiff person syndrome

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 587-588
Author(s):  
Miguel Angel Arrabal-Polo ◽  
Francisco Palao-Yago ◽  
Armando Zuluaga-Gomez
Keyword(s):  
Stiff Person Syndrome ◽  
Urodynamic Study

scholarly journals Incidence of Bacteriuria after Urodynamic Study with or without Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Women with Urinary Incontinence

2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 534-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Hirakauva ◽  
Ana Bianchi-Ferraro ◽  
Eliana Zucchi ◽  
Marcio Kajikawa ◽  
Manoel Girão ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Urine Culture ◽  
Placebo Control ◽  
Urodynamic Study ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

Introduction The presence of bacteria in urine is called bacteriuria, which may be symptomatic or asymptomatic. The manipulation of the urinary tract during urodynamic study (UDS), which is an invasive procedure, can result in urinary tract infection (UTI). Studies on the use of prophylactic antibiotics for UDSs are contradictory. Some investigators concluded that they were valuable and others did not. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis before UDS. This is a placebo-control randomized double-blind study. Methods Two-hundred and seventeen women affected by urinary incontinence were eligible for this study. All patients had presented negative urine culture previous to the UDS. They were randomized in four groups: group A received placebo, group B received 500 mg of levofloxacin, group C received 80 mg trimethoprim and 400 mg sulfamethoxazole and group D received 100 mg of nitrofurantoin. A urine culture was performed 14 days after the UDS. Results We observed asymptomatic bacteriuria after the UDS in five patients in group A, one in group B, one in group C and one in group D. Only one patient on group A had symptomatic bacteriuria. We didn't observe statistical difference between the groups. When we recategorized the patients in two groups, the incidence of bacteriuria was significantly higher in the placebo group compared with the antibiotic group. Conclusion The conclusion is that antibiotic prophylaxis before the UDS did not reduce the incidence of UTI in women within the target population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document