Supporting “good parent” beliefs with communication: Where do we go next?

2020 ◽  
pp. e28282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan A. Sisk
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 570
Author(s):  
Douglas Hill ◽  
Jennifer Faerber ◽  
Karen Carroll ◽  
Victoria Miller ◽  
Wynne Morrison ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 169 (1) ◽  
pp. 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Feudtner ◽  
Jennifer K. Walter ◽  
Jennifer A. Faerber ◽  
Douglas L. Hill ◽  
Karen W. Carroll ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 145 (6) ◽  
pp. e20194018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meaghann S. Weaver ◽  
Tessie October ◽  
Chris Feudtner ◽  
Pamela S. Hinds

2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas L. Hill ◽  
Jennifer A. Faerber ◽  
Yimei Li ◽  
Victoria A. Miller ◽  
Karen W. Carroll ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 019394592098479
Author(s):  
Katherine P. Kelly ◽  
Kathleen A. Knafl ◽  
Susan Keller ◽  
Pamela S. Hinds

We developed and applied metasynthesis methods to expand previously reported thematic descriptions of parents’ internal definition of “being a good parent to my seriously ill child” as part of a larger study to examine parenting of children with serious illness. Our systematic approach included: literature search, purposeful selection of grounded theories regarding parenting a seriously ill child, study summaries, mapping evidence of good parent themes onto structural elements of grounded theory, cross-study comparisons, and theoretical memoing to summarize analytic insights. Twenty-five grounded theory studies from 32 reviewed reports reflected multiple conditions (n=5), countries (n=10) and family members (n=386 families). We report a worked example of the processes used to extend the original good parent themes and detail our processes through one good parent theme. The methods we describe are a promising approach to extend thematic analysis findings and advance thematic expansions toward development of more formal theoretical syntheses.


2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 867-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian J. Villicana ◽  
Donna M. Garcia ◽  
Monica Biernat

Stereotypes may function as standards, such that individuals are judged relative to within-category expectations. Subjective judgments may mask stereotyping effects, whereas objective judgments may reveal stereotype-consistent patterns. We examined whether gender stereotypes about parenting lead judges to rate women and men as equally “good” parents while objective judgments favor women and whether parenting performance moderates this pattern. Participants evaluated a mother or father who successfully or unsuccessfully performed a parenting task. Subjective judgments of parent quality (“s/he is a good parent”) revealed no parent gender effects, but objective estimates of parenting performance favored mothers. In a hypothetical divorce scenario, participants also favored mothers in custody decisions. However, this pro-mother bias decreased when the mother failed at the parenting task (through her own fault). Performance did not affect custody decisions for fathers. We suggest parenting quality matters more for evaluations of mothers than for fathers because negative performance violates stereotyped expectations.


1982 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 127-136
Author(s):  
L. F. Lowenstein
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document