Shwachman‐Diamond syndrome and solid tumors: Three new patients from the French Registry for Severe Chronic Neutropenia and literature review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fares Bou Mitri ◽  
Blandine Beaupain ◽  
Jean‐François Flejou ◽  
Matthieu Patient ◽  
Ilona Okhremchuck ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Fares BOU MITRI ◽  
Blandine BEAUPAIN ◽  
Jean-Francois FLEJOU ◽  
Matthieu PATIENT ◽  
Ilona OKHREMCHUCK ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Lorenzi ◽  
Mayur Amonkar ◽  
Jacky Zhang ◽  
Shivani Mehta ◽  
Kai-Li Liaw

Background. Given limited data on the epidemiology of MSI-H and dMMR across solid tumors (except colorectal cancer (CRC)), the current study was designed to estimate their prevalence. Materials and Methods. A structured literature review identified English language publications that used immunohistochemistry (IHC) or polymerase chain replication (PCR) techniques. Publications were selected for all tumors except CRC using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases and key congresses; CRC and pan-tumor genomic publications were selected through a targeted review. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled prevalence of MSI-H/dMMR across all solid tumors and for selected tumor types. Where possible, prevalence within tumor types was estimated by disease stages. Results. Of 1,176 citations retrieved, 103 and 48 publications reported prevalence of MSI-H and dMMR, respectively. Five pan-tumor genomic studies supplemented the evidence base. Tumor types with at least 5 publications included gastric (n = 39), ovarian (n = 23), colorectal (n = 20), endometrial (n = 53), esophageal (n = 6), and renal cancer (n = 8). Overall MSI-H prevalence (with 95% CI) across 25 tumors was based on 90 papers (28,213 patients) and estimated at 14% (10%–19%). MSI-H prevalence among Stage 1/2 cancers was estimated at 15% (8%–23%); Stages 3 and 4 prevalence was estimated at 9% (3%–17%) and 3% (1%–7%), respectively. Overall, dMMR prevalence across 13 tumor types (based on 54 papers and 20,383 patients) was estimated at 16% (11%–22%). Endometrial cancer had the highest pooled MSI-H and dMMR prevalence (26% and 25% all stages, respectively). Conclusions. This is the first comprehensive attempt to report pooled prevalence estimates of MSI-H/dMMR across solid tumors based on published data. Prevalence determined by IHC and PCR was generally comparable, with some variations by cancer type. Late-stage prevalence was lower than that in earlier stages.


2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. A415
Author(s):  
O. Moulard ◽  
J. Mehta ◽  
M. Rose ◽  
R. Olivares ◽  
A. Hamed ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 130-130
Author(s):  
Laurence A Boxer ◽  
David Dale ◽  
Bonnie Cham ◽  
Sally Kinsey ◽  
Karl Welte ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2730-2730
Author(s):  
David C. Dale ◽  
Audrey Anna Bolyard ◽  
Cornelia Zeidler ◽  
Tracy M. Marrero ◽  
Laurence A. Boxer ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: In 1994 Severe Chronic Neutropenia International Registry (SCNIR) opened for enrollment of patients with at least 3 absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) less than 0.5 x 109/L during a three month period. At that time severe chronic neutropenia (SCN) was categorized as cyclic, congenital, autoimmune or idiopathic based largely on clinical criteria. A randomized trial had established effectiveness of treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), but long-term consequences of such treatment were unknown. Hypothesis: We began the SCNIR based on the hypothesis that underlying pathophysiology, natural history of patients with chronic neutropenia and benefits and risk of G-CSF therapy could only be accurately established through an international registry with long term follow-up of patients with these rare hematological disorders. Methods: SCNIR enrollment requires informed consent, ANC<0.5 x 109/L at least 3 times over a 3 month period, neutropenia not due to known systemic autoimmune disease (e.g., lupus, rheumatoid arthritis), cancer or cancer chemotherapy. There is a centralized enrollment process directed through offices in the US (Seattle) and Germany (Hannover). Continued enrollment requires annual follow-up information, i.e., clinical status, treatments and blood counts, and bone marrow reports for some categories of patients. Data on pregnancies, stem cell transplantation (SCT), non-hematological features and complications are also collected on standardized forms for subsets of patients. Comprehensive immunological assessments and genetic testing are encouraged but not required for enrollment. For some patient groups, e.g., Shwachman-Diamond syndrome (SDS) and Barth syndrome, the SCNIR now enrolls patients without severe neutropenia to gain perspectives on long-term outcomes for these disorders. Since 1994 the SCNIR has enrolled more than 2000 patients; 174 died, 193 resolved neutropenia, 543 withdrew or were lost to follow-up and almost all others continue in this long term observation study. The median follow-up for enrolled patients is now almost 10 years. The most common patient categories are idiopathic, cyclic (CyN) and congenital neutropenia (CN); 68% of CyN and 65% of CN patients having sequencing studies have mutations in ELANE. Some specific mutations are associated with high frequency (>90%) of severe outcomes (e.g. MDS/AML, failure to respond to G-CSF, death from infections, need for stem cell transplant) often many years after SCNIR enrollment and beginning G-CSF therapy. GSD1 patients improve with G-CSF treatment, but experience splenomegaly and continued problems with infections or complications. The SCNIR through a SDS sub-registry is redefining Shwachman-Diamond syndrome; only about one-half of enrollees have “classic” presentation and a substantial number with “classic presentation” lack mutations in SBDS. The SCNIR is participating in an NIH trial of a CXCR4 antagonist for treatment of WHIM syndrome, as an example of molecularly targeted treatment for this rare disease. The SCNIR is also the key resource for discovery of genetic causes for congenital neutropenia, e.g., G6PC3, HAX1, and TCIRG1 and others, recognition of differences in frequency of autosomal dominant and recessive SCN in populations of Europe and North America and identifying congenital neutropenia cases of unknown cause. Genetic testing has also broadened the clinical spectrum of these disorders. Conclusions: Through the efforts of patients, families, physicians, nurses and investigators, and with support from the NIH, industry, and private philanthropy, chronic neutropenia is now far better understood at the genetic, molecular and cellular level than 20 years ago. Treatment responses to G-CSF are well characterized; novel therapies are emerging; and the prognosis for patients with SCN appears to be improving. The knowledge gained through the SCNIR and availability of G-CSF has redefined clinicians’ approach to chronic neutropenia. The SCNIR is a model of international research collaboration to understand rare diseases in hematology and other areas of medicine. Broad enrollment criteria, physician, patient and family participation, a dedicated staff, and continuing cooperation underlie success of the SCNIR and this model to understanding rare diseases. Disclosures Dale: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Boxer:Amgen: Equity Ownership. Morrow:Amgen: Employment.


Cureus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Odunayo S Lawal ◽  
Nimisha Mathur ◽  
Srilatha Eapi ◽  
Rupak Chowdhury ◽  
Bilal Haider Malik

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-40
Author(s):  
R.V. Liubota ◽  
R.I. Vereschako ◽  
M.F. Anikusko ◽  
I.I. Liubota ◽  
Ya.M. Prykhodko

Haemophilia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Turudic ◽  
Jadranka Kelecic ◽  
Lana Omerza ◽  
Jurica Vukovic ◽  
Marko Bilic ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 10 ◽  
pp. 1461-1470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youting Bao ◽  
Zhichao Liu ◽  
Meiying Guo ◽  
Butuo Li ◽  
Xindong Sun ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document