Metabolic tumor volume as prognostic factor in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma: Dream or reality?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenico Albano
Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 131 (13) ◽  
pp. 1456-1463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Ségolène Cottereau ◽  
Annibale Versari ◽  
Annika Loft ◽  
Olivier Casasnovas ◽  
Monica Bellei ◽  
...  

Key Points Baseline metabolic tumor volume is a strong prognostic factor in early-stage HL. Baseline metabolic tumor volume affects the early response to treatment and, combined with early PET, improves risk stratification.


2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana R. Camacho ◽  
Elba Etchebehere ◽  
Natalia Tardelli ◽  
Marcia T. Delamain ◽  
Aline F.A. Vercosa ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Queralt Martín-Saladich ◽  
Gabriel Reynés-Llompart ◽  
Aida Sabaté-Llobera ◽  
Azahara Palomar-Muñoz ◽  
Eva Domingo-Domènech ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasmin Mettler ◽  
Horst Müller ◽  
Conrad-Amadeus Voltin ◽  
Christian Baues ◽  
Bernd Klaeser ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7579-7579
Author(s):  
Ling Li ◽  
Feng-Ming (Spring) Kong ◽  
Nan Bi ◽  
Jingbo Wang ◽  
Pawinee Mahasittiwat ◽  
...  

7579 Background: SUVmaxat baseline FDG-PET has been reported as a significant prognostic factor while recent studies suggest that metabolic tumor volume (MTV) may be more important factor in patients with NSCLC. We hypothesized that TLG is a better prognostic factor than either SUVmax or MTV alone for overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in NSCLC because it integrates both volumetric and biologic activity. Methods: The study population included a prospectively recruited cohort of stage I-III NSCLC patients treated with chemoradiation. FDG PET/CT scans were performed within 2 weeks from treatment start. The SUV in the tumor was normalized to that of the background level in the middle of ascending aorta to minimize the confounding effect from inter-scan variation in SUV measurement. MTV was delineated by auto-threshold at 1.5 times background level in the aorta followed by knowledge based manual editing. Mean and maximum SUV normalized to the background level were computed. TLG was calculated as the product of lesion SUVmean and MTV. Results: A total of 96 patients with minimum follow-up of 1 year were eligible. The median follow-up among survivors was 30 months. Univariate analysis demonstrated that MTV and TLG were significant factors for both OS and PFS (all P<0.05). There was a significant correlation between SUVmean and PFS (P=0.013), but there was no significant association between SUVmean and OS. SUVmax was not a significant factor for either OS or PFS (all P>0.05). Under multivariate Cox regression analysis, MTV (HR= 2.62, P= 0.003) and NSUVmean (HR=0.351, P=0.003) were significantly associated with PFS; but only TLG was significantly associated with OS (HR=2.14, P=0.006)adjusted by of TNM stage and other clinical factors. Conclusions: These results support our hypothesis that metabolic tumor volume and biologic average glucose metabolic activity of this volume are more important prognostic factors for overall prognosis than SUVmax in NSCLC patients treated with chemoradiation. Should this be validated by independent studies, future clinical trial should take this into consideration for individualized care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document