Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 2: for those women screened by NIPT using cell free DNA, maternal serum markers are obsolete

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (13) ◽  
pp. 1167-1171
Author(s):  
Yuval Yaron ◽  
Jon Hyett ◽  
Sylvie Langlois
2017 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 44-44
Author(s):  
M. Smet ◽  
N. Chan ◽  
A. McLennan ◽  
F. da Silva Costa

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2085-2085
Author(s):  
Yvonne Daniel ◽  
Julia Van Campen ◽  
Lee Silcock ◽  
Michael Yau ◽  
Joo Wook Ahn ◽  
...  

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common genetic haematological disorder worldwide. Around 300.000 affected infants are born every year, including at least 1000 in the United States. Prenatal diagnosis is currently carried out using amniotic fluid or chorionic villus sampling. These invasive procedures are perceived to have a small risk of miscarriage. The availability of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) is predicted to increase uptake of prenatal diagnosis for SCD, as it has no perceived miscarriage risk. NIPD may also be more readily implemented than invasive prenatal diagnosis in the low-resource countries in which SCD is the most prevalent. However, accurate NIPD of autosomal recessive disorders such as sickle cell disease has proven challenging as this requires detection of fetal inheritance of a maternal allele from a mixed maternal-fetal pool of cell-free DNA. We report the development of a targeted massively parallel sequencing assay for the NIPD of fetal SCD using cell-free fetal DNA from maternal plasma. No paternal or previous offspring samples were required. 44 clinical samples were analysed, including 37 plasma samples from pregnant SCD carriers and 7 plasma samples from women with SCD due to Hb SC. We used a relative mutation dosage based approach for the 37 samples from maternal SCD carriers (Hb AS or Hb AC), integrating Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs) into the analysis to improve the accuracy of wildtype and mutant allele counts. We used a separate wildtype allele detection approach for the 7 samples from women with compound heterozygous SCD, in whom the detection of wildtype cell-free DNA indicates the presence of a carrier fetus. The success of the assay was evaluated by comparing results with the established fetal sickle status as determined through either invasive prenatal diagnosis or newborn screening. During development, two key factors improved the accuracy of the results: i) Selective analysis of only smaller cell-free DNA fragments enhanced the fetal fraction for all samples, with greater effects observed in samples from earlier gestations. This approach improved diagnostic accuracy: for 3 out of 44 samples, the genotype was inconclusive or incorrect before size selection, but correct after size selection. ii) Modifications to DNA fragment hybridisation capture optimised the diversity of Unique Molecular Identifier-tagged molecules analysed. This led to improvements in the results obtained for 5 samples, with 3 previously inconclusive samples correctly called and 2 previously discrepant results moved into the inconclusive range. In total, 37 results were concordant with the established fetal sickle status; this included 30/37 samples from carrier women and 7/7 samples from women with sickle cell disease due to Hb SC. The remaining 7 carrier samples gave an inconclusive result, which for 3 samples was attributed to a low fetal fraction. Samples from as early as 8 weeks gestation were successfully genotyped. There were no false positive or false negative results. This study is the largest to use NGS-based NIPD on clinical plasma samples from pregnancies at risk of SCD. Efforts to validate the assay on a larger sample cohort and to reduce the inconclusive rate are warranted. This study shows that NIPD for SCD is approaching clinical utility and has the potential to provide increased choice to women with pregnancies at risk of sickle cell disease. Disclosures Silcock: Nonacus Ltd.: Employment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-143
Author(s):  
Sarang Younesi ◽  
Shahram Savad ◽  
Soudeh Ghafouri-Fard ◽  
Mohammad Mahdi Taheri-Amin ◽  
Pourandokht Saadati ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara O’Brien ◽  
Emily Willner

Prenatal genetic testing offers patients and providers the opportunity to screen for aneuploidy, genetic syndromes, and congenital malformations during pregnancy. Screening options include taking a clinical history, evaluation of maternal serum markers or noninvasive cell-free DNA, and ultrasound evaluation during the first and second trimesters. Invasive diagnostic testing such as amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling allows for further investigation of positive screening results and a directed test to identify aneuploidy as well as specific gene mutations and gain, loss, or rearrangement of genetic information. Laboratory methods for testing fetal samples differ by types of genetic abnormalities that can be detected and turnaround time for results; these methods include karyotype, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and microarray.   This review contains 5 figures, 5 tables and 43 references Key words: amniocentesis, aneuploidy, cell-free DNA, chorionic villus sampling, karyotype, microarray, prenatal genetic screening, ultrasonography  


Author(s):  
Amber Mathiesen ◽  
Kali Roy

This chapter provides information about a genetic counselor’s role in prenatal screening, including discussing and offering options to a patient, interpreting and providing results, or managing referrals based on abnormal results. It discusses how a screen is evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and personal utility. It provides a detailed description of both maternal serum screening and cell-free DNA testing. The maternal serum screening discussion includes information on multiples of median, calculating risk, timing, pattern association, limitations, and follow-up. The review of cell-free DNA testing includes fetal fraction, methodology, test performance, limitations and considerations for testing, and follow-up. This chapter also provides a list of additional resources to use for cell-free DNA testing.


Transfusion ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 1524-1530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiromichi Ariga ◽  
Hitoshi Ohto ◽  
Michael P. Busch ◽  
Shinya Imamura ◽  
Robert Watson ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. e10-e11
Author(s):  
Huiwen Che ◽  
Darine Vileila ◽  
Eftychia Dimitriadou ◽  
Jia Ding ◽  
Thierry Voet ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara O’Brien ◽  
Emily Willner

Prenatal genetic testing offers patients and providers the opportunity to screen for aneuploidy, genetic syndromes, and congenital malformations during pregnancy. Screening options include taking a clinical history, evaluation of maternal serum markers or noninvasive cell-free DNA, and ultrasound evaluation during the first and second trimesters. Invasive diagnostic testing such as amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling allows for further investigation of positive screening results and a directed test to identify aneuploidy as well as specific gene mutations and gain, loss, or rearrangement of genetic information. Laboratory methods for testing fetal samples differ by types of genetic abnormalities that can be detected and turnaround time for results; these methods include karyotype, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and microarray.   This review contains 5 figures, 5 tables and 43 references Key words: amniocentesis, aneuploidy, cell-free DNA, chorionic villus sampling, karyotype, microarray, prenatal genetic screening, ultrasonography  


2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 186-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam C. Urato ◽  
Inga Peter ◽  
Jacob Canick ◽  
Geralyn Lambert-Messerlian ◽  
Andrea Pulkkinen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document