Slower processing speed after treatment for pediatric brain tumor and acute lymphoblastic leukemia

AbstractBackgroundSurvivors of pediatric brain tumors are at risk for impaired development in multiple neuropsychological domains. The purpose of this study was to compare neuropsychological outcomes of pediatric brain tumor patients who underwent X-ray radiotherapy (XRT) versus proton radiotherapy (PRT).MethodsPediatric patients who underwent either XRT or PRT and received posttreatment age-appropriate neuropsychological evaluation—including measures of intelligence (IQ), attention, memory, visuographic skills, academic skills, and parent-reported adaptive functioning—were identified. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess differences in neuropsychological outcomes and included tests for interaction between treatment cohort and follow-up time.ResultsBetween 1998 and 2017, 125 patients with tumors located in the supratentorial (17.6%), midline (28.8%), or posterior fossa (53.6%) compartments received radiation and had posttreatment neuropsychological evaluation. Median age at treatment was 7.4 years. The PRT patient cohort had higher estimated SES and shorter median time from radiotherapy completion to last neuropsychological evaluation (6.7 vs 2.6 y, P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, PRT was associated with higher full-scale IQ (β = 10.6, P = 0.048) and processing speed (β = 14.4, P = 0.007) relative to XRT, with trend toward higher verbal IQ (β = 9.9, P = 0.06) and general adaptive functioning (β = 11.4, P = 0.07). Planned sensitivity analyses truncating follow-up interval in the XRT cohort re-demonstrated higher verbal IQ (P = 0.01) and IQ (P = 0.04) following PRT, with trend toward improved processing speed (P = 0.09).ConclusionsPRT is associated with favorable outcomes for intelligence and processing speed. Combined with other strategies for treatment de-intensification, PRT may further reduce neuropsychological morbidity of brain tumor treatment.

Download Full-text

QOL-11. COMPARISON OF TREATMENT BURDEN RATING SCALES ON NEUROCOGNITIVE OUTCOMES IN A MIXED SAMPLE OF PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMOR SURVIVORS

Neuro-Oncology ◽

10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.674 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽

pp. iii432-iii433

Author(s):

Muhammad Baig ◽

Ineke Olsthoorn ◽

Grace Yang ◽

Wafik Zaky ◽

Peter Stavinoha

Keyword(s):

Working Memory ◽

Brain Tumor ◽

Processing Speed ◽

Pediatric Brain Tumor ◽

Psychosocial Outcomes ◽

Treatment Intensity ◽

Treatment Burden ◽

Younger Age ◽

Neurocognitive Outcomes ◽

Pediatric Brain

Abstract BACKGROUND Predicting neurocognitive outcomes in pediatric brain tumor (PBT) patients is challenging. Rarity of PBT makes inclusion of detailed risk factors (e.g., treatment modality, intensity, individual complications) difficult when sample sizes are small. The Neurological Predictor Scale (NPS) summarizes complications and treatment factors associated with neurocognitive risks and has modest validation. Recently, the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Rating of Treatment Intensity (PNORTI) was developed to evaluate the impact of treatment intensity on psychosocial outcomes but has not been compared to neurocognitive outcomes. This study compared the NPS and PNORTI in terms of relationship to neurocognitive outcomes known to be at risk in PBT survivors. METHODS 88 PBT survivors’ neuropsychological outcomes were retrospectively analyzed in relation to the NPS and PNORTI. Variables of interest included IQ, working memory, and processing speed. RESULTS NPS associated with lower IQ (rs=-.476, p=.001), lower working memory (rs=-.323, p=.010), and lower processing speed (rs=-.389, p=.007) in patients diagnosed at a younger age, but only processing speed for children diagnosed after age 7 years (rs=-.262, p=.036). PNORTI was not correlated with neurocognitive variables for either group. CONCLUSION NPS has value in predicting neurocognitive outcomes, though much more in a younger age at diagnosis group compared to older patients. The PNORTI did not demonstrate predictive value for these neurocognitive domains in our sample. Given the potential clinical and research value of a summary rating of treatment burden relating to long-term outcome, future research should include relationship to psychosocial outcomes and quality of life.

Download Full-text