Firms' potential for economic sustainability and firm value: The moderating role of blockholders

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khine Kyaw ◽  
Steen Thomsen ◽  
Sirimon Treepongkaruna
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 375-386
Author(s):  
Hamed Ahmad Almahadin ◽  
Yazan Salameh Oroud

This study aims to investigate the moderating role of profitability in the relationship between capital structure and firm value in Jordan, as an example of an emerging economy. For this purpose, two functional models were formulated to capture the direct relationship as well as the interaction impact of capital structure on firm value. The robust empirical findings of panel data analysis provide strong evidence of an adverse relationship between capital structure and firm value. The findings confirm that the impact of capital structure appears to be complicated in nature and difficult to examine without controlling for the interaction of profitability as one of the major determinants. Therefore, studying the interaction effect provides ample evidence and enhances the understanding of the link between firm value and capital structure. The empirical results of the study may provide important insights and policy implications to decision-makers.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. e0215430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Akram Naseem ◽  
Jun Lin ◽  
Ramiz ur Rehman ◽  
Muhammad Ishfaq Ahmad ◽  
Rizwan Ali

Author(s):  
Aftab Ahmed ◽  
Muhammad Kashif Khurshid ◽  
Muhammad Usman Yousaf

Rapidly changing dynamics of globalization and increasing market competition are causing the companies all around the world confronting several new challenges and opportunities. To be competitive and successful apart from relative importance of physical resources, companies must adapt modern strategies and policies regarding market flexibility and development. The purpose of this study is to empirically investigate the relationship between intellectual capital and firm value. Furthermore, the moderating role of managerial ownership has been evaluated with the help of regression analysis. The sample included the panel data taken from non-financial firms listed on Pakistan stock exchange (PSX) covering the period 2010-2015. A sample of 79 firms out of 384 firms have been selected with the help of systematic sampling technique. VAIC (Value Added Intellectual Coefficient) model has been used for the calculation of intellectual capital. Tobin's Q has been taken as a measure of firm value. Managerial ownership has been tested as moderator. Based on data analysis, it is concluded that the relationship between intellectual capital and firm value is positively significant. It is also concluded that managerial ownership moderates the relationship between intellectual capital and firm value negatively.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 47
Author(s):  
Poh Linawati ◽  
Perminas Pangeran

The purpose of this study is to examine the moderating role of industry concentration betweencorporate governance (Board of Commissioners Independent, Managerial Ownership, andInstitusional Ownership) and firm value. Industry concentration classification is calculated by theHerfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI). In terms of chow test can be concluded that the regressionequation between sub-groups of concentrated industries and less concentrated industries differsignificantly and it shows that the industry concentration is moderating variable.Keywords: Industrial Concentration, Board Of Commissioners Independent, Managerial Ownership,Institusional Ownership, Firm Value.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 174-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lily (Xuehui) Gao ◽  
Iguácel Melero-Polo ◽  
F. Javier Sese

Financial service organizations are increasingly interested in ways to improve the service experience quality for customers, while customers progressively perceive the commoditization of banking services. This is no easy task, as factors outside the control of the service firm can influence customers’ perceptions of their experience. This study builds on the customer equity framework to understand the linkages between what the firm does (customer equity drivers: value equity, brand equity, and relationship equity), the social environment (social influence), the customer experience quality, and its ultimate impact on profitability. Using perceptual and transactional data for a sample of customers of financial services, we demonstrate the central role played by factors under the control of the firm (value, brand, and relationship equity) and those outside its control (social influence) in shaping customers’ perceptions of the quality of their experience. We offer new insights into the moderating role of social influence in the linkages between the customer equity drivers and the customer experience quality. The managerial takeaway is that the impact of customer equity drivers on the customer experience quality is contingent on the influence exerted by other people and that enhancing customer experience quality can be a way to increase monetary returns.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document