scholarly journals EP06.18: Current prenatal screening efficacy of Trisomy 21, 18 13 in the Taiwan: a 6-year national registry study

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 288-288
Author(s):  
C. Hsiao ◽  
Chen
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Zhu ◽  
Xiaoxiao Jin ◽  
Yuqing Xu ◽  
Weihua Zhang ◽  
Xiaodan Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) is widely used as the alternative choice for pregnant women at high-risk of fetal aneuploidy. However, whether NIPS has a good detective efficiency for pregnant women at advanced maternal age (AMA) has not been fully studied especially in Chinese women. Methods Twenty-nine thousand three hundred forty-three pregnant women at AMA with singleton pregnancy who received NIPS and followed-up were recruited. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the Youden Index for detecting fetal chromosomal aneuploidies were analyzed. The relationship between maternal age and common fetal chromosomal aneuploidy was observed. Results The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV of NIPS for detecting fetal trisomy 21 were 99.11, 99.96, 90.98, and 100%, respectively. These same parameters for detecting fetal trisomy 18 were 100, 99.94, 67.92, and 100%, respectively. Finally, these parameters for detecting trisomy 13 were 100, 99.96, 27.78, and 100%, respectively. The prevalence of fetal trisomy 21 increased exponentially with maternal age. The high-risk percentage incidence rate of fetal trisomy 21 was significantly higher in the pregnant women at 37 years old or above than that in pregnant women at 35 to 37 years old. (Youden index = 37). Conclusion It is indicated that NIPS is an effective prenatal screening method for pregnant women at AMA.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Frida Degerstedt ◽  
Martin Björklund ◽  
Britt‐Inger Keisu ◽  
Birgit Enberg

Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (35) ◽  
pp. e12045
Author(s):  
Liangpu Xu ◽  
Hailong Huang ◽  
Lin Zheng ◽  
Deqin He ◽  
Na Lin ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 115 (5) ◽  
pp. 364-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
I-Ming Chen ◽  
Shih-Cheng Liao ◽  
Ming-Been Lee ◽  
Chia-Yi Wu ◽  
Po-Hsien Lin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Ido Lurie ◽  
Nehama Goldberger ◽  
Adi Gur Orr ◽  
Ziona Haklai ◽  
Shlomo Mendlovic

2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Reza Kamyab ◽  
Fahimeh Shahrokhi ◽  
Elmira Shamsian ◽  
Mina Hayat Nosaied ◽  
Parvin Dibajnia ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document