scholarly journals Rapid climate transformation requires transformative policy and science thinking—An editorial essay

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
John Byrne ◽  
Peter Lund ◽  
Job Taminiau
Keyword(s):  
Policy And Science ◽  
Editorial Essay

Stern and his critics on discounting and climate change: an editorial essay

2008 ◽  
Vol 89 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 195-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Quiggin
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Editorial Essay

Editorial Essay

ILR Review ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 787-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariel C. Avgar ◽  
Adrienne E. Eaton ◽  
Rebecca Kolins Givan ◽  
Adam Seth Litwin
Keyword(s):  
Editorial Essay

Editorial Essay: Mapping Social Work Research: Pasts, Presents and Futures

2012 ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Shaw ◽  
Katharine Briar-Lawson ◽  
Joan Orme ◽  
Roy Ruckdeschel
Keyword(s):  
Social Work ◽  
Social Work Research ◽  
Editorial Essay

scholarly journals Editorial Essay: The Tumult over Transparency: Decoupling Transparency from Replication in Establishing Trustworthy Qualitative Research

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Pratt ◽  
Sarah Kaplan ◽  
Richard Whittington
Keyword(s):  
Social Psychology ◽  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Experimental Social Psychology ◽  
Research Management ◽  
The Core ◽  
Replication Crisis ◽  
Methodological Approaches ◽  
Core Issues ◽  
Editorial Essay

Management journals are currently responding to challenges raised by the “replication crisis” in experimental social psychology, leading to new standards for transparency. These approaches are spilling over to qualitative research in unhelpful and potentially even dangerous ways. Advocates for transparency in qualitative research mistakenly couple it with replication. Tying transparency tightly to replication is deeply troublesome for qualitative research, where replication misses the point of what the work seeks to accomplish. We suggest that transparency advocates conflate replication with trustworthiness. We challenge this conflation on both ontological and methodological grounds, and we offer alternatives for how to (and how not to) think about trustworthiness in qualitative research. Management journals need to tackle the core issues raised by this tumult over transparency by identifying solutions for enhanced trustworthiness that recognize the unique strengths and considerations of different methodological approaches in our field.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document