scholarly journals K0 of a semilocal ring

2000 ◽  
Vol 225 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Facchini ◽  
Dolors Herbera
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-141
Author(s):  
Tamer Košan ◽  
Serap Sahinkaya ◽  
Yiqiang Zhou

AbstractLet R be a ring. A map f: R → R is additive if f(a + b) = f(a) + f(b) for all elements a and b of R. Here, a map f: R → R is called unit-additive if f(u + v) = f(u) + f(v) for all units u and v of R. Motivated by a recent result of Xu, Pei and Yi showing that, for any field F, every unit-additive map of (F) is additive for all n ≥ z, this paper is about the question of when every unit-additivemap of a ring is additive. It is proved that every unit-additivemap of a semilocal ring R is additive if and only if either R has no homomorphic image isomorphic to or R/J(R) ≅ with 2 = 0 in R. Consequently, for any semilocal ring R, every unit-additive map of (R) is additive for all n ≥ 2. These results are further extended to rings R such that R/J(R) is a direct product of exchange rings with primitive factors Artinian. A unit-additive map f of a ring R is called unithomomorphic if f(uv) = f(u)f(v) for all units u, v of R. As an application, the question of when every unit-homomorphic map of a ring is an endomorphism is addressed.


Author(s):  
Gaohua Tang ◽  
Huadong Su ◽  
Pingzhi Yuan

An element [Formula: see text] of a ring [Formula: see text] is called a quasi-idempotent if [Formula: see text] for some central unit [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text], or equivalently, [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is a central unit and [Formula: see text] is an idempotent of [Formula: see text]. A ring [Formula: see text] is called a quasi-Boolean ring if every element of [Formula: see text] is quasi-idempotent. A ring [Formula: see text] is called (strongly) quasi-clean if each of its elements is a sum of a quasi-idempotent and a unit (that commute). These rings are shown to be a natural generalization of the clean rings and strongly clean rings. An extensive study of (strongly) quasi-clean rings is conducted. The abundant examples of (strongly) quasi-clean rings state that the class of (strongly) quasi-clean rings is very larger than the class of (strongly) clean rings. We prove that an indecomposable commutative semilocal ring is quasi-clean if and only if it is local or [Formula: see text] has no image isomorphic to [Formula: see text]; For an indecomposable commutative semilocal ring [Formula: see text] with at least two maximal ideals, [Formula: see text]([Formula: see text]) is strongly quasi-clean if and only if [Formula: see text] is quasi-clean if and only if [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] is a maximal ideal of [Formula: see text]. For a prime [Formula: see text] and a positive integer [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] is strongly quasi-clean if and only if [Formula: see text]. Some open questions are also posed.


1978 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 872-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerrold L. Kleinstein ◽  
Alex Rosenberg

This paper originated in an attempt to carry over the results of [3] from the case of a field of characteristic different from two to that of semilocal rings. To carry this out, we reverse the point of view of [3] and do assume a full knowledge of the theory of Witt rings of classes of nondegenerate symmetric bilinear forms over semilocal rings as given, for example, in [10; 11]. It turns out that the rings WT of [3] are just the residue class rings of W(C), the Witt ring of a semilocal ring C, modulo certain intersections of prime ideals.


1978 ◽  
Vol 236 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-224
Author(s):  
Alex Rosenberg ◽  
Roger Ware

2007 ◽  
Vol 147 (5) ◽  
pp. 6995-7004
Author(s):  
N. A. Vavilov
Keyword(s):  

1982 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 998-999 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. A. Vavilov ◽  
L. Yu. Kolotilina

1988 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-135
Author(s):  
J Pfalzgraf
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (07) ◽  
pp. 1450037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alborz Azarang ◽  
Greg Oman

It is shown that RgMax (R) is infinite for certain commutative rings, where RgMax (R) denotes the set of all maximal subrings of a ring R. It is observed that whenever R is a ring and D is a UFD subring of R, then | RgMax (R)| ≥ | Irr (D) ∩ U(R)|, where Irr (D) is the set of all non-associate irreducible elements of D and U(R) is the set of all units of R. It is shown that every ring R is either Hilbert or | RgMax (R)| ≥ ℵ0. It is proved that if R is a zero-dimensional (or semilocal) ring with | RgMax (R)| < ℵ0, then R has nonzero characteristic, say n, and R is integral over ℤn. In particular, it is shown that if R is an uncountable artinian ring, then | RgMax (R)| ≥ |R|. It is observed that if R is a noetherian ring with |R| > 2ℵ0, then | RgMax (R)| ≥ 2ℵ0. We determine exactly when a direct product of rings has only finitely many maximal subrings. In particular, it is proved that if a semisimple ring R has only finitely many maximal subrings, then every descending chain ⋯ ⊂ R2 ⊂ R1 ⊂ R0 = R where each Ri is a maximal subring of Ri-1, i ≥ 1, is finite and the last terms of all these chains (possibly with different lengths) are isomorphic to a fixed ring, say S, which is unique (up to isomorphism) with respect to the property that R is finitely generated as an S-module.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document