How Do I Remember Thee? The Role of Encoding Set and Delay in Reconstructive Memory Processes

1995 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 379-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward R. Hirt ◽  
Hugh E. McDonald ◽  
Grant A. Erickson
2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 713-727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah A. Orban ◽  
Mark D. Rapport ◽  
Lauren M. Friedman ◽  
Samuel J. Eckrich ◽  
Michael J. Kofler

1994 ◽  
Vol 647 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tangui Maurice ◽  
Masayuki Hiramatsu ◽  
Tsutomu Kameyama ◽  
Takaaki Hasegawa ◽  
Toshitaka Nabeshima

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juergen Fell ◽  
Nikolai Axmacher

Author(s):  
Antonella Gasbarri ◽  
Mario D’Amico ◽  
Benedetto Arnone ◽  
Carla Iorio ◽  
Francesca Pacitti ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan E. Gathercole ◽  
Cath Willis ◽  
Hazel Emslie ◽  
Alan D. Baddeley

ABSTRACTIt has recently been suggested that the developmental association between nonword repetition performance and vocabulary knowledge reflects the contribution of phonological memory processes to vocabulary acquisition (e.g., Gathercole & Baddeley, 1989). An alternative account of the association is that the child uses existing vocabulary knowledge to support memory for nonwords. The present article tests between these two alternative accounts by evaluating the role of phonological memory and linguistic factors in nonword repetition. In a longitudinal database, repetition accuracy in 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds was found to be sensitive to two independent factors: a phonological memory factor, nonword length, and a linguistic factor, wordlikeness. To explain these combined influences, it is suggested that repeating nonwords involves temporary phonological memory storage which may be supported by either a specific lexical analogy or by an appropriate abstract phonological frame generated from structurally similar vocabulary items.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document