Intracellular Bacteria Associated with Winter Mortality in Juvenile Giant Clams, Tridacna gigas

1993 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.H. Norton ◽  
M.A. Shepherd ◽  
H.C. Prior
Coral Reefs ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 519-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick C. Cabaitan ◽  
Cecilia Conaco

2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Junemie Hazel L. Lebata-Ramos ◽  
Koichi Okuzawa ◽  
Ronald J. Maliao ◽  
Jeff Bogart R. Abrogueña ◽  
Mark Darwin N. Dimzon ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 205 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Alder ◽  
R Braley

A survey of giant clams (family Tridacnidae) at Lizard Island fringing reefs on the Great Barrier Reef in July 1985 indicated that over the previous 6 weeks the combined total mortality for Tridacna gigas and T. derasa was 28% at Watson's Bay (WB) and 20% at the channel between Palfrey Island and South Island (P-S). Sporadic mortalities continued at intervals through to December 1985 when combined total mortalities at WB and P-S had reached 38% and 32%, respectively. By January 1987, mortality for these two species was 54% at WB and 51% at P-S. Deaths were not restricted to a particular size class and the average size of clams that died did not change with time during the study. Mortality rates for clams which had been previously biopsied for gonad condition and/or those induced to spawn with serotonin injection were not significantly different from controls. Distribution of dead clams was random to slightly clumped with respect to alive and dead clams within WB, and random within P-S. Results of heavy-metal analyses of tissues from moribund clams were similar to previous results for normal clams. The histopathology of tissues from six of eight moribund clams revealed an unidentified unicellular organism which was not found in Tridacna spp. from previous or subsequent samples from Lizard Island reefs or from other reef areas.


1991 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 241 ◽  
Author(s):  
RG Pearson ◽  
JL Munro

Growth, recruitment and mortality rates of a population of giant clams (Tridacna gigas and T. derasa) were monitored between 1978 and 1985 in a 2.7 ha study area on Michaelmas Reef, Great Barrier Reef. The initial 1978 census revealed the presence of 1166 T. gigas and 44 T. derasa. For T. gigas, the Fabens method provided growth-parameter estimates of L∞ = 85.7 cm, K = 0.07 and to = 0.732 year. The generated von Bertalanffy growth curve was a relatively poor fit to an empirical growth curve. A better description of growth was obtained for younger clams by using a forced value of L∞, = 80 cm, yielding K = 0.105 and to = 0.145 year. There was marked variability in the growth rate of individual clams, which has implications for the aquaculture industry. Average annual mortality rates in two census intervals (1978 to 1980-81 and 1980-81 to 1985) were 3.4 and 10.7% respectively. A comparison of the calculated size structure (assuming constant recruitment) with the observed size structure clearly suggested that recruitment was not constant and had declined drastically from a peak in the 1950s. For the much smaller population of T. derasa, the Fabens routine yielded estimates of L∞ = 46.91 cm, K= 0.108 and to = -0.188 year. The average annual mortality rate was 4.4%. Trends in recruitment could not be determined because of the small sample size. This study has highlighted the need for follow-up studies of this and other populations of giant clams if we are to understand more fully the processes of growth, recruitment and mortality in wild stocks and the implications for stock management and aquaculture.


1995 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.H. Norton ◽  
H.C. Prior ◽  
B. Baillie ◽  
D. Yellowlees

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 467-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youna Lyons ◽  
Denise Cheong ◽  
Mei Lin Neo ◽  
Hiu Fung Wong

Abstract Tridacna gigas, the world’s largest living bivalve, could once be found on shallow coral reefs across the Indo-Pacific Region where its presence can be traced back to around 10 million years. However, following several local extinctions throughout its geographic range, its SCS population appears to have also been the subject of unprecedented overharvesting. This article discusses the obligations of littoral States of the SCS to protect and preserve this threatened resource and its habitat, to cooperate and consult with each other to that effect and act with due diligence. Given these obligations and the risk of irreversible harm and species’ extinction in the SCS, it proposes that littoral States should proceed to list the SCS population of T. gigas in the CITES Appendix I, impose an immediate ban on further harvesting pending (re-)assessment of the population, and adopt a management plan to ensure its survival and sustainable use.


Aquaculture ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.A. Tisdell ◽  
L. Tacconi ◽  
J.R. Barker ◽  
J.S. Lucas

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document