A Risk Analysis for Production Processes with Disposable Bioreactors

Author(s):  
Tobias Merseburger ◽  
Ina Pahl ◽  
Daniel Müller ◽  
Markus Tanner
2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
DANIEL-CĂTĂLIN FELEGEANU ◽  
VALENTIN NEDEFF ◽  
MIRELA PANAINTE-LEHĂDUȘ

<p>Operators worldwide are using hazardous substances in the production process and after the completion of production processes, those substances can cause major accidents with serious consequences on the health and safety of people and the environment. This paper describes some of the methods of risk analysis in plants who use hazardous substances in the production process, in order to identify a method combined-complete, to provide the data needed to calculate the effects of chemical accidents and emergency planning.</p>


1992 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan G. Kamhi

My response to Fey’s article (1985; reprinted 1992, this issue) focuses on the confusion caused by the application of simplistic phonological definitions and models to the assessment and treatment of children with speech delays. In addition to having no explanatory adequacy, such definitions/models lead either to assessment and treatment procedures that are similarly focused or to procedures that have no clear logical ties to the models with which they supposedly are linked. Narrowly focused models and definitions also usually include no mention of speech production processes. Bemoaning this state of affairs, I attempt to show why it is important for clinicians to embrace broad-based models of phonological disorders that have some explanatory value. Such models are consistent with assessment procedures that are comprehensive in nature and treatment procedures that focus on linguistic, as well as motoric, aspects of speech.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy S. Francis ◽  
Pilar Regalado ◽  
Silvia P. Saenz ◽  
Gabriela Duran

2010 ◽  
Vol 58 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Schönebeck ◽  
B Reiter ◽  
O Haye ◽  
D Böhm ◽  
M Ismail ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 60-77
Author(s):  
E. V. Vasilieva ◽  
T. V. Gaibova

This paper describes the method of project risk analysis based on design thinking and explores the possibility of its application for industrial investment projects. Traditional and suggested approaches to project risk management have been compared. Several risk analysis artifacts have been added to the standard list of artifacts. An iterative procedure for the formation of risk analysis artifacts has been developed, with the purpose of integrating the risk management process into strategic and prompt decision-making during project management. A list of tools at each stage of design thinking for risk management within the framework of real investment projects has been proposed. The suggested technology helps to determine project objectives and content and adapt them in regards to possible; as well as to implement measures aimed at reducing these risks, to increase productivity of the existing risk assessment and risk management tools, to organize effective cooperation between project team members, and to promote accumulation of knowledge about the project during its development and implementation.The authors declare no conflict of interest.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document