Microtubules and Pathogen Defence

Author(s):  
Issei Kobayashi ◽  
Yuhko Kobayashi
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 64 (11) ◽  
pp. 3385-3395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Mir ◽  
M. Luisa Hernández ◽  
Eliane Abou-Mansour ◽  
José Manuel Martínez-Rivas ◽  
Félix Mauch ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 86-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imre E. Somssich ◽  
Klaus Hahlbrock

Plant Biology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 723-736 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Sørhagen ◽  
M. Laxa ◽  
C. Peterhänsel ◽  
S. Reumann
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Kupfer ◽  
Daniel M.T. Fessler ◽  
Colin Holbrook ◽  
Adam Maxwell Sparks ◽  
Theodore Samore ◽  
...  

Disgust has long been viewed as a primary motivator of defensive responses to threats posed by both microscopic pathogens and macroscopic ectoparasites. Although disgust can defend effectively against pathogens encountered through ingestion or incidental contact, it offers limited protection against ectoparasites, which actively pursue a host and attach to its surface. Humans might, therefore, possess a distinct ectoparasite defence system—including cutaneous sensory mechanisms and grooming behaviours—functionally suited to guard the body's surface. In two US studies and one in China, participants (N = 1079) viewed a range of ectoparasite- and pathogen-relevant video stimuli and reported their feelings, physiological sensations, and behavioural motivations. Participants reported more surface-guarding responses towards ectoparasite stimuli than towards pathogen stimuli, and more ingestion/contamination-reduction responses towards pathogen stimuli than towards ectoparasite stimuli. Like other species, humans appear to possess evolved psychobehavioural ectoparasite defence mechanisms that are distinct from pathogen defence mechanisms.


2008 ◽  
pp. 1557-1560
Author(s):  
Hardy Schön ◽  
Judith Scharte ◽  
Jutta Essmann ◽  
Ina Schmitz-Thom ◽  
Engelbert Weis

2021 ◽  
Vol 72 (9) ◽  
pp. 3367-3380
Author(s):  
Rita B Santos ◽  
Andreia Figueiredo

Abstract Proteases are an integral part of plant defence systems, and their role in plant–pathogen interactions is unequivocal. Emerging evidence suggests that different protease families contribute to the establishment not only of hypersensitive response, priming, and signalling, but also of recognition events through complex proteolytic cascades. Moreover, they play a crucial role in pathogen/microbe-associated molecular pattern (PAMP/MAMP)-triggered immunity as well as in effector-triggered immunity. However, despite important advances in our understanding of the role of proteases in plant defence, the contribution of proteases to pathogen defence in grapevine remains poorly understood. In this review, we summarize current knowledge of the main grapevine pathosystems and explore the role of serine, cysteine, and aspartic proteases from both the host and pathogen point of views.


2018 ◽  
Vol 104 ◽  
pp. 69-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Carere ◽  
Jonathan Powell ◽  
Timothy Fitzgerald ◽  
Kemal Kazan ◽  
Donald M. Gardiner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document