Functional Psychological Assessment and Clinical Judgment

This study was concerned with the correspondence between the classification of measures by clinical judgment and by factor analysis. Forty-six measures were selected to assess language, auditory processing, reading-spelling, maxillofacial structure, articulation, and other processes. These were applied to 98 misarticulating eight- and nine-year-old children. Factors derived from the analysis corresponded well with categories the measures were selected to represent.

Download Full-text

Debates in Dysphagia Management: How Do You Use Evidence-Based Practice in Your Dysphagia Patient Care?

Perspectives on Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia) ◽

10.1044/sasd20.4.121 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 20 (4) ◽

pp. 121-123

Author(s):

Jeri A. Logemann

Keyword(s):

Decision Making ◽

Patient Care ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Clinical Judgment ◽

Clinical Decision Making ◽

Evidence Based Practice ◽

Clinical Decision ◽

Evidence Based ◽

Clinical Method ◽

Do So

Evidence-based practice requires astute clinicians to blend our best clinical judgment with the best available external evidence and the patient's own values and expectations. Sometimes, we value one more than another during clinical decision-making, though it is never wise to do so, and sometimes other factors that we are unaware of produce unanticipated clinical outcomes. Sometimes, we feel very strongly about one clinical method or another, and hopefully that belief is founded in evidence. Some beliefs, however, are not founded in evidence. The sound use of evidence is the best way to navigate the debates within our field of practice.

Download Full-text

Effects of Systematic Training in Psychological Assessment on Competence in Writing Reports

Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie ◽

10.1024//0170-1789.23.4.407 ◽

2002 ◽

Vol 23 (4) ◽

pp. 407-416

Author(s):

Heike Eckert ◽

Karl Westhoff

Keyword(s):

Psychological Assessment ◽

Individual Feedback ◽

Systematic Training

Abstract: In practice every graduate in psychology is expected to be competent in writing psychological reports. First we discuss the basic determinants of the acquisition of this competence. Then we describe how these basic determinants are taken into consideration in the study. The effects of several measures to improve this training are tested. They relate to structure, contents and realization in the sequence of lectures and seminars. Three hypotheses on the effectiveness of our training were tested by evaluation of the examination reports written in 5 consecutive years (N1 = 229, N2 = 119). The results show that a systematic acquisition of knowledge and competence can be supported by different didactic aids as individual feedback, checklists with rules on how to proceed and also checklists for mistakes.

Download Full-text

Articles Published in EJPA 2009–2010

European Journal of Psychological Assessment ◽

10.1027/1015-5759/a000082 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 27 (4) ◽

pp. 290-298 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Tuulia M. Ortner ◽

Isabella Vormittag

Keyword(s):

Psychological Assessment ◽

Rating Scales ◽

Self Report ◽

Related Field ◽

Broad Scope ◽

Future Challenges ◽

Health Related ◽

Report Data ◽

Self Report Data

With reference to EJPA’s unique and broad scope, the current study analyzed the characteristics of the authors as well as the topics and research aims of the 69 empirical articles published in the years 2009–2010. Results revealed that more than one third of the articles were written by authors affiliated with more than one country. With reference to their research aims, an almost comparable number of articles (1) presented a new measure, (2) dealt with adaptations of measures, or (3) dealt with further research on existing measures. Analyses also revealed that most articles did not address any particular field of application. The second largest group was comprised of articles related to the clinical field, followed by the health-related field of application. The majority of all articles put their focus on investigating questionnaires or rating scales, and only a small number of articles investigated procedures classified as tests or properties of interviews. As to further characteristics of the method(s) used, a majority of EJPA contributions addressed self-report data. Results are discussed with reference to publication demands as well as the current and future challenges and demands of psychological assessment.

Download Full-text

Rorschach Assessment of Complex Trauma in Youth

Rorschachiana Journal of the International Society for the Rorschach ◽

10.1027/1192-5604/a000122 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (1) ◽

pp. 19-41

Author(s):

David Ephraim

Keyword(s):

Psychological Assessment ◽

Complex Trauma ◽

Personality Development ◽

Traumatic Events ◽

History Of ◽

The Way

Abstract. A history of complex trauma or exposure to multiple traumatic events of an interpersonal nature, such as abuse, neglect, and/or major attachment disruptions, is unfortunately common in youth referred for psychological assessment. The way these adolescents approach the Rorschach task and thematic contents they provide often reflect how such experiences have deeply affected their personality development. This article proposes a shift in perspective in the interpretation of protocols of adolescents who suffered complex trauma with reference to two aspects: (a) the diagnostic relevance of avoidant or emotionally constricted Rorschach protocols that may otherwise appear of little use, and (b) the importance of danger-related thematic contents reflecting the youth’s sense of threat, harm, and vulnerability. Regarding this last aspect, the article reintroduces the Preoccupation with Danger Index ( DI). Two cases are presented to illustrate the approach.

Download Full-text