Biracial/Multiracial Identity Development

Author(s):  
Beth Kleinman-Fleischer
2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Harrison ◽  
Kevin D. Thomas ◽  
Samantha N. N. Cross

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Courtney Meiling Jones ◽  
Leoandra Onnie Rogers

Despite the enduring popular view that the rise in the multiracial population heralds our nation’s transformation into a post-racial society, Critical Multiracial Theory (MultiCrit) asserts that how multiracial identity status is constructed is inextricably tied to systems and ideologies that maintain the white supremacist status quo in the United States. MultiCrit, like much of the multiracial identity literature, focuses predominantly on the experiences of emerging adults; this means we know little about the experiences of multiracial adolescents, a peak period for identity development. The current paper uses MultiCrit to examine how a diverse sample of multiracial youth (n = 49; Mage = 15.5 years) negotiate racial identity development under white supremacy. Our qualitative interview analysis reveals: (a) the salience of socializing messages from others, (b) that such messages reinforce a (mono)racist societal structure via discrimination, stereotyping, and invalidation, and (c) that multiracial youth frequently resist (mono)racist assertions as they make sense of their own identities. Our results suggest that multiracial youth are attentive to the myriad ways that white supremacy constructs and constrains their identities, and thus underscores the need to bring a critical lens to the study of multiracial identity development.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa R. Laurent ◽  
Robert L. Harrison ◽  
Mark P. Orbe ◽  
Lydia Kauffman

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (174) ◽  
pp. 21-27
Author(s):  
Alicia K. Stites ◽  
Mohammad‐Mehdi A. Khan ◽  
Shannon R. Dean‐Scott

Author(s):  
Silvia C. Bettez ◽  
Aurora Chang ◽  
Kathleen E. Edwards

“Multiracial Youth Identity Meta-Ethnography” describes the findings from a meta-ethnography of research accounts about Multiracial identity development in young adults. This chapter examines eight purposefully selected studies about Multiracial identity uncovering how identity theories are being deployed in qualitative studies of mixed-race youth and what is revealed in the collective that may be obscured when each study is independently evaluated. These themes came to the fore: (a) fluid identities, (b) isolation from “monoracial” individuals and communities, and (c) the importance of place/space for Multiracial people. The analysis also revealed (a) a lack of attendance to intersectionality in both participants’ identities and authors’ positionalities and (b) the absence of attention to Whiteness and White supremacy in discussing Multiraciality, a discursive strategy the authors call Whiteblindness. This meta-ethnography revealed that researchers’ paradigmatic perspectives and theoretical frameworks impact the framing of problems and solutions related to understanding and working with Multiracial youth.


2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 268-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aida Orgocka ◽  
Jasna Jovanovic

This study examined how social opportunity structure influences identity exploration and commitment of Albanian high school students. A total of 258 students completed a questionnaire that gauged their identity exploration and commitment in three domains: education, occupation, and family. ANOVA results indicated that, overall, students scored highest in exploration in the domain of education and in commitment in the domain of family. Students' exploration and commitment were linked to gender. Albanian female students scored higher than male students in exploration and commitment regarding education and family. Perceived work opportunities in Albania or abroad also significantly moderated participants' exploration in the domain of education and were associated with commitment in education and occupation. As one of the first studies to explore Albanian youth's identity development in relation to social opportunity structure, findings are discussed in light of furthering the field of Albanian adolescent and youth development.


2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 115-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Matschke ◽  
Kai Sassenberg

Entering a new group provides the potential of forming a new social identity. Starting from self-regulation models, we propose that goals (e.g., internal motivation to enter the group), strategies (e.g., approach and avoidance strategies), and events (e.g., the group’s response) affect the development of the social self. In two studies we manipulated the group’s response (acceptance vs. rejection) and assessed internal motivation as well as approach and avoidance strategies. It was expected, and we found, that when newcomers are accepted, their use of approach strategies (but not avoidance strategies) facilitates social identification. In line with self-completion theory, for highly internally motivated individuals approach strategies facilitated social identification even upon rejection. The results underline the active role of newcomers in their social identity development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document