Assessment and Treatment of Anxiety in Primary Care

2008 ◽  
pp. 169-182
Author(s):  
Holly Hazlett-Stevens
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Jank ◽  
Alexander Gallee ◽  
Markus Boeckle ◽  
Sabine Fiegl ◽  
Christoph Pieh

Background. Chronic pain (CP) and sleep disorders (SD) are highly prevalent in the general population. However, comprehensive data regarding the prevalence and characteristics of pain and SD in primary care are rare. Methods. From N=578 patients N=570 were included within 8 weeks (mean age: 50.8±18.7 years, females: 289). Sociodemographic data, Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and parts of a self-report questionnaire for pain (Multidimensional German Pain Questionnaire) were recorded and additional medical information (pain medication, sleep medication) was gathered from the patient charts. Results. Of the total sample, 33.2% (n=189) suffer from CP (pain ≥ 6 months) and 29.1% (n=166) from SD. 45.5% of the CP patients suffer from SD and 26.5% from clinical insomnia (ISI ≥ 15). SD (β = 0.872, SE = 0.191,  t = 4,572, p<0.001, CI [0.497; 1.246]) and older age (β = 0.025, SE = 0.005, t = 5.135, p<0.001, CI [0.015; 0.035]) were significantly associated with pain experience. Conclusion. About a quarter of CP patients suffer from clinical insomnia. The suggested bidirectional relation should be considered during comprehensive assessment and treatment of patients.


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilse F Badenbroek ◽  
Daphne M Stol ◽  
Marcus MJ Nielen ◽  
Monika Hollander ◽  
Roderik A Kraaijenhagen ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (5) ◽  
pp. 18-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin Chamanga

BJGP Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. bjgpopen17X101217
Author(s):  
Simon Feist-Wilson ◽  
Neil Heron

BackgroundGeneral practice in the UK is ‘in crisis’. With 20% of GP workload relating to musculoskeletal (MSK) problems, an orthopaedic Integrated Clinical Assessment and Treatment Service (ICATS) could help support assessment of these patients in primary care, alleviating pressure on GPs. However, practitioners in ICATS must be trained appropriately to ensure its effectiveness.AimThis evaluation aimed to identify the training levels of doctors in one Northern Ireland orthopaedic ICATS system, what their future training needs are, and suggestions for how this service could be improved to better support general practice.Design & settingA questionnaire study in an orthopaedic ICATS, Northern Ireland.MethodAll seven doctors working within the Southern Trust orthopaedic ICATS were asked to complete a questionnaire detailing their training and experience in MSK medicine. Their views on how the service could be improved were elicited.ResultsSix of seven questionnaires were returned. All responders were Members of the Royal College of General Practitioners (MRCGP), while five of six held a Diploma in Sports and Exercise Medicine (Dip SEM). Half of responders suggested that MSK ultrasound could be beneficial within ICATS. However, it was viewed that extensive training would be required before paediatric MSK patients could be included.ConclusionHigh levels of training and experience were reported by responders, suggesting ICATS provides a high-level MSK service. Furthermore, it was noted that inclusion of MSK ultrasound and paediatric patients into this service could be beneficial but not without undertaking further training. With appropriate funding and support the ICATS service has the potential to expand the clinical services it offers to general practice, helping to reduce work pressures in primary care at this time of crisis for UK general practice.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina King ◽  
Albert Dube ◽  
Beatiwel Zadutsa ◽  
Lumbani Banda ◽  
Josephine Langton ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e019633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kingsley Powell ◽  
Emma Le Roux ◽  
Jonathan Banks ◽  
Matthew J Ridd

ObjectivesTo compare parents’ and clinicians’ perspectives on the assessment and treatment of children with eczema in primary care.DesignQualitative interview study with purposive and snowball sampling and thematic analysis.Setting14 general practices in the UK.Participants11 parents of children with eczema and 15 general practitioners (GPs) took part in semistructured individual interviews.ResultsWe identified several areas of dissonance between parents and GPs. First, parents sought a ‘cause’ of eczema, such as an underlying allergy, whereas GPs looked to manage the symptoms of an incurable condition. Second, parents often judged eczema severity in terms of psychosocial impact, while GPs tended to focus on the appearance of the child’s skin. Third, parents sought ‘more natural’ over-the-counter treatments or complementary medicine, which GPs felt unable to endorse because of their unknown effectiveness and potential harm. Fourth, GPs linked poor outcomes to unrealistic expectations of treatment and low adherence to topical therapy, whereas parents reported persisting with treatment and despondency with its ineffectiveness. Consultations were commonly described by parents as being dominated by the GP, with a lack of involvement in treatment decisions. GPs’ management of divergent views varied, but avoidance strategies were often employed.ConclusionsDivergent views between parents and clinicians regarding the cause and treatment of childhood eczema can probably only be bridged by clinicians actively seeking out opinions and sharing rationale for their approach to treatment. Together with assessing the psychosocial as well as the physical impact of eczema, asking about current or intended use of complementary therapy and involving parents in treatment decisions, the management of eczema and patient outcomes could be improved.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document