RNA-Seq Data Analysis Pipeline for Plants: Transcriptome Assembly, Alignment, and Differential Expression Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 47-60
Author(s):  
David J. Burks ◽  
Rajeev K. Azad
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Differential Expression ◽  
Expression Analysis ◽  
Transcriptome Assembly ◽  
Differential Expression Analysis ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Analysis Pipeline ◽  
Data Analysis Pipeline

scholarly journals A semi-parametric Bayesian approach, iSBA, for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ran Bi ◽  
Peng Liu
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Differential Expression ◽  
Expression Analysis ◽  
Bayesian Approach ◽  
Dirichlet Process ◽  
Differential Expression Analysis ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Study Gene Expression ◽  
Bayesian Mixture

AbstractRNA sequencing (RNA-seq) technologies have been popularly applied to study gene expression in recent years. Identifying differentially expressed (DE) genes across treatments is one of the major steps in RNA-seq data analysis. Most differential expression analysis methods rely on parametric assumptions, and it is not guaranteed that these assumptions are appropriate for real data analysis. In this paper, we develop a semi-parametric Bayesian approach for differential expression analysis. More specifically, we model the RNA-seq count data with a Poisson-Gamma mixture model, and propose a Bayesian mixture modeling procedure with a Dirichlet process as the prior model for the distribution of fold changes between the two treatment means. We develop Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) posterior simulation using Metropolis Hastings algorithm to generate posterior samples for differential expression analysis while controlling false discovery rate. Simulation results demonstrate that our proposed method outperforms other popular methods used for detecting DE genes.

scholarly journals Assembly-free rapid differential gene expression analysis in non-model organisms using DNA-protein alignment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anish M.S. Shrestha ◽  
Joyce Emlyn B. Guiao ◽  
Kyle Christian R. Santiago
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Differential Expression ◽  
Expression Analysis ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Transcriptome Assembly ◽  
Differential Expression Analysis ◽  
Homology Search ◽  
Model Organisms ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Protein Database

AbstractRNA-seq is being increasingly adopted for gene expression studies in a panoply of non-model organisms, with applications spanning the fields of agriculture, aquaculture, ecology, and environment. Conventional differential expression analysis for organisms without reference sequences requires performing computationally expensive and error-prone de-novo transcriptome assembly, followed by homology search against a high-confidence protein database for functional annotation. We propose a shortcut, where we obtain counts for differential expression analysis by directly aligning RNA-seq reads to the protein database. Through experiments on simulated and real data, we show drastic reductions in run-time and memory usage, with no loss in accuracy. A Snakemake implementation of our workflow is available at:https://bitbucket.org/project_samar/samar

scholarly journals Best practices on the differential expression analysis of multi-species RNA-seq

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Chung ◽  
Vincent M. Bruno ◽  
David A. Rasko ◽  
Christina A. Cuomo ◽  
José F. Muñoz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Differential Expression ◽  
Expression Analysis ◽  
Differential Expression Analysis ◽  
Single Species ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Species Analysis ◽  
Differential Gene ◽  
Multiple Species ◽  
Downstream Analysis

AbstractAdvances in transcriptome sequencing allow for simultaneous interrogation of differentially expressed genes from multiple species originating from a single RNA sample, termed dual or multi-species transcriptomics. Compared to single-species differential expression analysis, the design of multi-species differential expression experiments must account for the relative abundances of each organism of interest within the sample, often requiring enrichment methods and yielding differences in total read counts across samples. The analysis of multi-species transcriptomics datasets requires modifications to the alignment, quantification, and downstream analysis steps compared to the single-species analysis pipelines. We describe best practices for multi-species transcriptomics and differential gene expression.

scholarly journals The long and the short of it: unlocking nanopore long-read RNA sequencing data with short-read differential expression analysis tools

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xueyi Dong ◽  
Luyi Tian ◽  
Quentin Gouil ◽  
Hasaru Kariyawasam ◽  
Shian Su ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Differential Expression ◽  
Expression Analysis ◽  
Differential Expression Analysis ◽  
Transcriptomic Analysis ◽  
Statistical Testing ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Short Read ◽  
Sequencing Platform ◽  
Long Read

Abstract Application of Oxford Nanopore Technologies’ long-read sequencing platform to transcriptomic analysis is increasing in popularity. However, such analysis can be challenging due to the high sequence error and small library sizes, which decreases quantification accuracy and reduces power for statistical testing. Here, we report the analysis of two nanopore RNA-seq datasets with the goal of obtaining gene- and isoform-level differential expression information. A dataset of synthetic, spliced, spike-in RNAs (‘sequins’) as well as a mouse neural stem cell dataset from samples with a null mutation of the epigenetic regulator Smchd1 was analysed using a mix of long-read specific tools for preprocessing together with established short-read RNA-seq methods for downstream analysis. We used limma-voom to perform differential gene expression analysis, and the novel FLAMES pipeline to perform isoform identification and quantification, followed by DRIMSeq and limma-diffSplice (with stageR) to perform differential transcript usage analysis. We compared results from the sequins dataset to the ground truth, and results of the mouse dataset to a previous short-read study on equivalent samples. Overall, our work shows that transcriptomic analysis of long-read nanopore data using long-read specific preprocessing methods together with short-read differential expression methods and software that are already in wide use can yield meaningful results.

scholarly journals Alignment and mapping methodology influence transcript abundance estimation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avi Srivastava ◽  
Laraib Malik ◽  
Hirak Sarkar ◽  
Mohsen Zakeri ◽  
Fatemeh Almodaresi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Differential Expression ◽  
Expression Analysis ◽  
Differential Expression Analysis ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Simulated Data ◽  
Transcript Abundance ◽  
Mapping Method ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Transcript Quantification ◽  
Quantification Model

AbstractBackgroundThe accuracy of transcript quantification using RNA-seq data depends on many factors, such as the choice of alignment or mapping method and the quantification model being adopted. While the choice of quantification model has been shown to be important, considerably less attention has been given to comparing the effect of various read alignment approaches on quantification accuracy.ResultsWe investigate the influence of mapping and alignment on the accuracy of transcript quantification in both simulated and experimental data, as well as the effect on subsequent differential expression analysis. We observe that, even when the quantification model itself is held fixed, the effect of choosing a different alignment methodology, or aligning reads using different parameters, on quantification estimates can sometimes be large, and can affect downstream differential expression analyses as well. These effects can go unnoticed when assessment is focused too heavily on simulated data, where the alignment task is often simpler than in experimentally-acquired samples. We also introduce a new alignment methodology, called selective alignment, to overcome the shortcomings of lightweight approaches without incurring the computational cost of traditional alignment.ConclusionWe observe that, on experimental datasets, the performance of lightweight mapping and alignment-based approaches varies significantly and highlight some of the underlying factors. We show this variation both in terms of quantification and downstream differential expression analysis. In all comparisons, we also show the improved performance of our proposed selective alignment method and suggest best practices for performing RNA-seq quantification.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document