Preference Testing

Author(s):  
Harry T. Lawless ◽  
Hildegarde Heymann
Keyword(s):  
1997 ◽  
Vol 1997 ◽  
pp. 16-16
Author(s):  
P.J. Goddard ◽  
S.M. Abeyesinghe

The farming of red deer (Cervus elaphus) for venison is a small but established part of the UK livestock industry. While slaughtering of deer is undertaken in commercial abattoirs, as yet there are no specific regulations governing the welfare of deer at this time. The behavioural characteristics of deer lead to the supposition that inappropriate pre-slaughter handling may adversely affect their welfare. In particular, exposure to unfamiliar species, as could occur in a multi-species abattoir, may be an area of particular concern: placing groups of unfamiliar animals next to each other has been reported to cause stress in cattle (Duchesne & Perry, 1975). Results of an experiment which investigated the location, orientation and behaviour of deer when penned between pens of unfamiliar species (i.e. modified preference testing) are presented.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron R Braverman ◽  
David F Fine ◽  
Tyler J Shick ◽  
Jason P Stezoski ◽  
Rehana K Leak ◽  
...  

Introduction: Cardiac arrest survival has improved with advances in resuscitation care, but survivors face impairments from the resulting hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HIBI). Given the popular clinical use of DA modulators, despite limited understanding of disturbances in DA neurotransmission after HIBI, we characterized striatal DA signaling and behavioral deficits in a rat model of asphyxial cardiac arrest (ACA). Hypothesis: ACA-induced HIBI alters DA neurotransmission linked to behavioral deficits. Methods: Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=41) underwent either Sham procedures (n=10) or 5-min no-flow ACA (n=28) insult. Fast-scan cyclic voltammetry (FSCV) and maximal medial forebrain bundle stimulations (60Hz, 10s) were used to characterize presynaptic DA signaling in dorsal striatum (D-Str). FSCV findings were compared with sensorimotor processing [acoustic startle responses (ASR)], open field exploration (total distance & exploratory zone entries), myoclonus, and anhedonia (sucrose preference testing). Results: ACA increased maximum evoked overflow (fig 1) and several DA release-based kinetic metrics. ACA hindered sensorimotor processing via increased ASR %change, elicited myoclonic responses to auditory stimuli, reduced mobility & exploration, and increased anhedonia. Many behavioral measures correlated with D-Str neurotransmission ( fig 2 ). Conclusions: ACA causes early hypodopaminergia that evolves to a hyperdopaminergic state by 2 weeks that is associated with behavioral dysfunction. Future work should further characterize striatal pathology post-ACA and identify treatments to resolve altered DA signaling and behavioral deficits.


1997 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 19-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. B. Lawrence ◽  
A. W. Illius

AbstractCurrent methodologies for measuring choices are the product of early psychological research into behavioural mechanisms, particidarly learning. In applied behaviour studies, much of the emphasis has been on the use of preference tests to assess animals’ motivation, and hence proximate need for, various forms of stimulation. Preference tests are based on a modular view of animal behaviour, where animals are presented with physical compartments each containing different resources such as food or social partners. An obvious limitation of the approach is that simple preference tests may do little justice to the complexity of animals’ behavioural organization and environmental preferences. Variability of choice behaviour also poses a considerable problem, as it may prevent us understanding and interpreting short-term choices and consequently describing the proximate needs of the animal. We also believe that the approach of applying consumer economics to quantify the value of resources to animals is increasingly moving preference testing away from measuring proximate to measuring ultimate need. This shift in emphasis does not appear to have been recognized. The risk is that the approach will only identify basic needs (e.g. related to growth and reproduction) but be insensitive to the proximate behavioural needs that it set out to quantify. In general, the focus of welfare-related preference testing should shift from the measurement and description of preferences to the more strategic task of understanding the rules governing short-term choices. We will be unable to measure proximate need unless we can develop a theoretical framework better able to interpret short-term behavioural choices.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mackenzie E. Batali ◽  
William D. Ristenpart ◽  
Jean-Xavier Guinard

Abstract The brew temperature is widely considered a key parameter affecting the final quality of coffee, with a temperature near 93 °C often described as optimal. In particular, drip brewers that do not achieve a minimum brew temperature of 92 °C within a prescribed time period fail their certification. There is little empirical evidence in terms of rigorous sensory descriptive analysis or consumer preference testing, however, to support any particular range of brew temperatures. In this study, we drip-brewed coffee to specific brew strengths, as measured by total dissolved solids (TDS), and extraction yields, as measured by percent extraction (PE), spanning the range of the classic Coffee Brewing Control Chart. Three separate brew temperatures of 87 °C, 90 °C, or 93 °C were tested, adjusting the grind size and overall brew time as necessary to achieve the target TDS and PE. Although the TDS and PE both significantly affected the sensory profile of the coffee, surprisingly the brew temperature had no appreciable impact. We conclude that brew temperature should be considered as only one of several parameters that affect the extraction dynamics, and that ultimately the sensory profile is governed by differences in TDS and PE rather than the brew temperature, at least over the range of temperatures tested.


1978 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence H. Levine ◽  
Stuart Baden

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document