Integrated Delivery Networks

Author(s):  
Alyson Widmer ◽  
Joan Hovhanesian
1996 ◽  
Vol 22 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 301-330
Author(s):  
Eleanor D. Kinney

In the American health care system, payers are rapidly moving toward the use of capitation as the preferred method for paying for health care services for sponsored patients. n capitation, the payer pays a provider organization a set rate per patient to care for a group of patients. The provider organization assumes the risk of the actual costs of caring for these covered lives. The theory of capitation is that providers, by assuming risk, will have incentives to contain their costs.The provider entity that provides the care can take many corporate forms. A capitated provider can be a small group of physicians with admitting privileges at a single hospital or a complex integrated delivery network comprised of hospitals, physicians, and other health care professionals and institutions with integrated case management and data systems. Currently such integrated delivery networks assume a variety of organizational forms, ranging from traditional staff model health maintenance organizations (HMOs) in which physicians are employees of the health plan to physician hospital organizations (PHOs) in which physicians and hospitals join together for purposes of contracting with payers. Hospitals and physicians belonging to their medical staffs are motivated to form integrated delivery networks or other consolidated business organizations in order to contract with payers that seek providers willing to accept financial risk for the care of sponsored patients. Providers join such arrangements out of fear of losing patients if they do not.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1951-1951
Author(s):  
Juzer Lotya ◽  
Amol Dhamane ◽  
Lisa Rosenblatt ◽  
Jenny Jiang ◽  
Deysia Levin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: For patients with VTE, current American Society of Hematology (ASH) guideline panel suggests using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) where VKAs are required to be bridged with a parenteral anticoagulant (PAC). For patients with VTE and cancer, current guidelines recommend DOACs over low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and LMWH over unfractionated heparin (heparin) for the initial treatment of VTE. Limited evidence is available about the patterns of anticoagulant treatment for VTE in routine clinical practice of large healthcare delivery networks in the United States (US) and whether the VTE treatments are aligned with current guidelines. This study aimed to assess real-world anticoagulant treatment patterns among VTE patients using harmonized electronic health record (EHR) data from four Integrated Delivery Networks (IDNs) in the US. Methods: This was a retrospective, longitudinal, multicenter, cohort study using harmonized EHR data from both inpatient and outpatient settings. The study population included adult patients prescribed DOACs, warfarin, and/or PAC therapy as inpatient or outpatient treatment within ≤30 days of VTE diagnosis, between June 2015 through May 2018. Data from the four IDNs was pooled to describe demographic characteristics and treatment patterns among VTE patients overall and by subgroups. Results: A total of 10,527 patients who were treated with OACs after VTE diagnosis were included for analysis. The mean (SD) age was 61.9 (5.98) years, with 46.1% aged 65 or older. More than half (53.2%) were female, and White patients comprised the majority (74.4%), followed by African American patients (22.8%). Obese and morbidly obese patients comprised 39.1% and 16.1% of patients, respectively. Among all VTE patients, warfarin-only (n=3545; 33.7%) was the most commonly used OAC treatment, followed by warfarin + PAC (n=3128; 29.7%), rivaroxaban-only (n=1357; 12.9%), rivaroxaban + PAC (n=853; 8.1%), apixaban + PAC (n=839; 8.0%), apixaban-only (n=762; 7.2%), and Other OAC (n=357; 3.4%) (Table 1). When stratifying VTE patients by age, gender, race and BMI, some variations in OAC treatment were observed. Among both older (≥65 years) and younger (<65 years) patients, warfarin-only was most commonly used, then warfarin + PAC. Warfarin-only was more commonly used among obese (36.3%) and morbidly obese (40.4%) patients than non-obese (29.8%) patients. OAC treatment patterns were generally comparable among men and women. Among White patients, approximately equal proportions of patients received warfarin + PAC (31.9%) and warfarin-only (31.0%). However, among African-American patients, a higher proportion of patients used warfarin-only (40.9%) vs. warfarin + PAC (24.5%). Patterns of anticoagulant treatments including OACs and/or parental anticoagulants among VTE patients with cancer were further analyzed (Figure 1). Among VTE patients with cancer (n=3657), heparin had the highest use (26.7%), then enoxaparin (22.7%); approximately the same proportion of cancer patients received warfarin-only (16.0%) and warfarin + PAC (16.9%). Of DOACs, rivaroxaban-only was the most commonly used treatment (4.9%), then apixaban + PAC (3.5%), and lastly, rivaroxaban + PAC (3.4%) among cancer patients. Conclusion: Current VTE treatment guidelines recommend warfarin to be bridged with PAC, however, warfarin-only therapy remained the most used treatment option followed by warfarin + PAC. While rivaroxaban and apixaban are not required to be bridged with PAC, such practices were observed for a large proportion of apixaban- and rivaroxaban-treated VTE patients. VTE treatment among patients with cancer was not completely aligned with current guidelines, as heparin was more commonly used than LMWH (enoxaparin). Our findings suggest greater efforts are needed to improve anticoagulant treatment practices among VTE patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Dhamane: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Rosenblatt: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Jiang: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Guo: Bristol Myers Squibb: Ended employment in the past 24 months. Dorsch: Agency for Health Research and Quality: Research Funding; National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Aging: Research Funding; American Health Association Health IT Research Network: Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Luo: Pfizer Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Butzner ◽  
Phil Sarocco ◽  
Ethan J Rowin ◽  
Martin S Maron ◽  
Laura A Robertson

Background: Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) has mostly been studied in patients treated in advanced comprehensive Centers of Excellence (COE). Understanding the true prevalence of patients with oHCM in the general US population may improve the screening, identification, and treatment outside of COEs. Objectives: To describe the demographics and clinical characteristics of patients with oHCM. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study to assess patient-level data from the IBM Explorys database (observational period: January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2018). The Explorys database amassed electronic medical records from 39 Integrated Delivery Networks (IDN) from ~12,982,704 patients. We identified adult patients (>18 years old) with oHCM and report their demographics and clinical characteristics from index date to the end of study period. Results: Of 8,792 patients, 53.0% were female, and 81.2% Caucasian (mean index age: 61.8 years). Primary insurance type was private (58.9%); 54.9% of patients lived in the Midwest. Mean BMI at index was 30.4; 30.9% were nondrinkers. The mean Quan-Charlson Comorbidity Index was 6.35% with the most common comorbidities being congestive heart failure (31.9%), chronic pulmonary disease (20.1%), and diabetes without chronic complications (16.9%). CV drug rates included β-blockers (80.5%), CCBs (46.0%), ACE inhibitors (27.7%), ARBs (18.8%), disopyramide (2.4%) and amiodarone (13.0%). Surgical procedure rates included septal myectomy (22%), ablation (19.8%), implantable cardioverter defibrillator (11.2%), and heart transplantation (0.3%). Major residual side effects subsequent to surgical procedures included atrial fibrillation (31.4%) and reintervention (15.6%). Common reintervention procedures included ablation and septal myectomy. Conclusions: This is the first study to examine a national sample of oHCM patients using clinical data from more than 39 IDNs. Leveraging the Explorys database allowed us to analyze a larger, more diverse cohort of oHCM patients across the entire broader US. The results from this analysis may be used to compare the characteristics of patients with oHCM in the general population with those treated in COE.


1994 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marian C. Jennings ◽  
Sarah J. OʼLeary

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 638-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue Barnes ◽  
Chris Zirges ◽  
Dawn Tomac ◽  
Kathleen Hall-Meyer ◽  
Linda Stein ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document