Germ Cell Development in C. elegans

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (21) ◽  
pp. 4861-4871 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Subramaniam ◽  
G. Seydoux

In Drosophila, the posterior determinant nanos is required for embryonic patterning and for primordial germ cell (PGC) development. We have identified three genes in Caenorhabditis elegans that contain a putative zinc-binding domain similar to the one found in nanos, and show that two of these genes function during PGC development. Like Drosophila nanos, C. elegans nos-1 and nos-2 are not generally required for PGC fate specification, but instead regulate specific aspects of PGC development. nos-2 is expressed in PGCs around the time of gastrulation from a maternal RNA associated with P granules, and is required for the efficient incorporation of PGCs into the somatic gonad. nos-1 is expressed in PGCs after gastrulation, and is required redundantly with nos-2 to prevent PGCs from dividing in starved animals and to maintain germ cell viability during larval development. In the absence of nos-1 and nos-2, germ cells cease proliferation at the end of the second larval stage, and die in a manner that is partially dependent on the apoptosis gene ced-4. Our results also indicate that putative RNA-binding proteins related to Drosophila Pumilio are required for the same PGC processes as nos-1 and nos-2. These studies demonstrate that evolutionarily distant organisms utilize conserved factors to regulate early germ cell development and survival, and that these factors include members of the nanos and pumilio gene families.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda L. Minogue ◽  
Kenneth A. Trimmer ◽  
Jacob H. Seemann ◽  
Awdhesh Kalia ◽  
Swathi Arur

ABSTRACTSmall non-coding RNAs regulate multiple aspects of development including germ cell development. The microRNA pathway genes Dicer, Drosha and Pasha have been shown to regulate oocyte meiotic maturation in C. elegans. However, Dicer controls oocyte meiotic maturation through endo-siRNAs, rather than microRNAs. A repertoire of Drosha-dependent oocyte-expressed microRNAs were identified which regulate various aspects of oogenesis but not oocyte meiotic maturation. These data lead to the following models: (a) microRNAs function redundantly to regulate oocyte meiotic maturation, (b) Drosha and microRNAs function germline non-autonomously to regulate meiotic maturation. We investigated these models and observed that Drosha regulates oocyte meiotic maturation in a germline non-autonomous manner. Additionally, we uncovered a role for Drosha in regulating pachytene progression and oocyte development in a germline autonomous manner through miR-35 family and miR-51 respectively. Interestingly we also find that though Drosha-dependent oocyte-expressed microRNAs, miR-61 and miR-72, are sufficient to regulate pachytene progression and oocyte development respectively, they are generated in a germline non-autonomous manner. Collectively these data reveal a Drosha-dependent microRNA circuit, which coordinates oocyte development germline autonomously as well as through soma-germline communication.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian A. Poush ◽  
Nicolas A. Blouin ◽  
Kristin R. Di Bona ◽  
Vladimir Lažetić ◽  
David S. Fay

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document