Sample Preparation Methods for Scanning Electron Microscopy

Author(s):  
Orlando J. Castejón
2016 ◽  
Vol 122 ◽  
pp. 63-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Albert Österreicher ◽  
Manoj Kumar ◽  
Andreas Schiffl ◽  
Sabine Schwarz ◽  
Daniel Hillebrand ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 28-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Moran ◽  
Brittany Coats

Sample preparation is a critical step in scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging. This is especially true for biological samples because of charge build-up and sensitivity to vacuum and electron beam damage. In terms of ultrastructure imaging, a variety of advancements in detectors and approaches have improved biological imaging such that fewer steps are required for sample preparation. However, the conventional approach incorporating osmium tetroxide fixing, ethanol dehydrating, critical-point drying, and coating still finds useful application. This paper evaluates three biological sample-preparation methodologies for imaging the ultrastructure of immature porcine retina. The three preparation methods examined are critical-point drying (CPD), hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) dehydration, and direct imaging by environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM). Preparation methodologies were evaluated based on resulting image quality and reduced potential for artifacts.


Author(s):  
Toshihiko Takita ◽  
Tomonori Naguro ◽  
Toshio Kameie ◽  
Akihiro Iino ◽  
Kichizo Yamamoto

Recently with the increase in advanced age population, the osteoporosis becomes the object of public attention in the field of orthopedics. The surface topography of the bone by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is one of the most useful means to study the bone metabolism, that is considered to make clear the mechanism of the osteoporosis. Until today many specimen preparation methods for SEM have been reported. They are roughly classified into two; the anorganic preparation and the simple preparation. The former is suitable for observing mineralization, but has the demerit that the real surface of the bone can not be observed and, moreover, the samples prepared by this method are extremely fragile especially in the case of osteoporosis. On the other hand, the latter has the merit that the real information of the bone surface can be obtained, though it is difficult to recognize the functional situation of the bone.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramprashad Prabhakaran ◽  
Vineet V. Joshi ◽  
Mark A. Rhodes ◽  
Alan L. Schemer-Kohrn ◽  
Anthony D. Guzman ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 36-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias I. Baskin ◽  
Teri J. Orr ◽  
Michael Jercinovic ◽  
Masato Yoshida

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document