Plasma Coagulation Factors in Emergency Room Patients with Acute Chest Pain and Subsequent Hospitalization: Myocardial Infarction, Coronary Artery Disease, and Hypertension

1995 ◽  
pp. 291-298
Author(s):  
C. F. Saladino ◽  
V. Misra ◽  
N. Sathish ◽  
R. Fox ◽  
S. E. Feffer ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Sivabaskari Pasupathy ◽  
Rosanna Tavella ◽  
Margaret Arstall ◽  
Derek Chew ◽  
Matthew Worthley ◽  
...  

Background: Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is being increasingly recognized with the frequent use of angiography following Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI); yet there is little evaluation of these patients in the literature. The current study is a prospective, contemporary analysis of clinical features and chest pain characteristics between patients with MINOCA and Myocardial Infarction with coronary artery disease (MI-CAD). Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography for AMI (as per the Third Universal AMI Definition) in South Australian public hospitals from January 2012 - December 2013 were included. Data was captured by Coronary Angiogram Database of South Australia (CADOSA), a comprehensive registry compatible with the NCDR ® CathPCI ® Registry. The AMI patients were classified as MI-CAD or MINOCA on the basis of the presence or absence of a significant stenosis (≥50%) on angiography. Results: From 3,431 angiography procedures undertaken for AMI, 359 (11%) were classified as MINOCA. MINOCA patients were younger (59 ± 15 vs. 64 ± 13, p <0.01) and more likely to be female (60% vs. 26%, p<0.01), with age adjusted analysis revealing less cardiovascular risk factors in MINOCA compared to MICAD: current smoker (21% vs. 35%, p< 0.01), hypertension (56% vs. 65%, p<0.01), dyslipidaemia (46% vs. 61%, p<0.01), and diabetes (20% vs. 32%, p<0.01). Analysis of presenting chest pain characteristics showed no significant differences between MICAD and MINOCA for the presence of retrosternal pain (81% vs. 82%, p>0.05,) or shoulder pain (27% vs. 26%, p>0.05) respectively, however MINOCA patients were less likely to experience arm pain (33% vs. 40%, p<0.01). In regards to precipitating factors, emotional stress was more common (14% vs. 5%, p<0.001) and exertion related chest pain was less common (27% vs. 40%, p<0.001) in MINOCA patients. Quality of pain for MINOCA and MICAD was similar with the most frequent descriptors being burning (11% vs. 9%, p>0.05), sharp 21% vs. 23%, p>0.05) and tightness (41% vs. 44%, p>0.05). In addition, there were no significant differences observed between groups in relieving factors and duration of chest pain Conclusions: In contemporary cardiology practice, MINOCA presentation is more common than previously appreciated, with younger women frequently implicated. Delineating a MINOCA patient from MICAD on the basis of chest pain characteristics is not feasible.


Author(s):  
Jeff M Smit ◽  
Mohammed El Mahdiui ◽  
Michiel A de Graaf ◽  
Arthur JHA Scholte ◽  
Lucia Kroft ◽  
...  

Patients presenting with chronic and acute chest pain constitute a common and important diagnostic challenge. This has increased interest in using computerized tomography for non-invasive visualization of coronary artery disease in patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department, particularly the subset of patients who are suspected of having an acute coronary syndrome, but without typical electrocardiographic changes and with normal troponin levels at presentation. As a result of rapid developments in coronary computerized tomography angiography technology, high diagnostic accuracies for excluding coronary artery disease can be obtained. It has been shown that these patients can be discharged safely. The accuracy for detecting a significant coronary artery stenosis is also high, but the presence of coronary artery atherosclerosis or stenosis does not imply necessarily that the cause of the chest pain is related to coronary artery disease. Moreover, non-invasive detection of coronary artery disease by computerized tomography has been shown to be related with an increased use of subsequent invasive coronary angiography and revascularization, and further studies are needed to define which patients benefit from invasive evaluation following coronary computerized tomography angiography. Conversely, implementation of coronary computerized tomography angiography can significantly reduce the length of hospital stay, with a significant cost reduction. Additionally, computerized tomography is an excellent modality in patients whose symptoms suggest other causes of acute chest pain such as aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, or pulmonary embolism. Furthermore, acquisition of the coronary arteries, thoracic aorta, and pulmonary arteries in a single computerized tomography examination is feasible, allowing ‘triple rule-out’ (exclusion of aortic dissection, pulmonary embolism, and coronary artery disease). Finally, other applications, such as evaluation of coronary artery plaque composition, myocardial function and perfusion, and non-invasive assessment of fractional flow reserve from coronary computerized tomography angiography, are currently being developed and may also become valuable in the setting of chronic and acute chest pain in the future.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Cyrus M. Munguti ◽  
Samuel Akidiva ◽  
Jacob Wallace ◽  
Hussam Farhoud

Protocols exist on how to manage STEMI patients, with well-established timelines. There are times when patients present with chest pain, ST segment elevation, and biomarker elevation that are not due to coronary artery disease. These conditions usually present with normal coronary angiography. We present a case that was clinically indistinguishable from STEMI and that was diagnosed with focal myopericarditis on cardiac MRI.


Author(s):  
Michiel A de Graaf ◽  
Arthur JHA Scholte ◽  
Lucia Kroft ◽  
Jeroen J Bax

Patients presenting with acute chest pain constitute a common and important diagnostic challenge. This has increased interest in using computed tomography for non-invasive visualization of coronary artery disease in patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department; particularly the subset of patients who are suspected of having an acute coronary syndrome, but without typical electrocardiographic changes and with normal troponin levels at presentation. As a result of rapid developments in coronary computed tomography angiography technology, high diagnostic accuracies for excluding coronary artery disease can be obtained. It has been shown that these patients can be discharged safely. The accuracy for detecting a significant coronary artery stenosis is also high, but the presence of coronary artery atherosclerosis or stenosis does not imply necessarily that the cause of the chest pain is related to coronary artery disease. Moreover, the non-invasive detection of coronary artery disease by computed tomography has been shown to be related with an increased use of subsequent invasive coronary angiography and revascularization, and further studies are needed to define which patients benefit from invasive evaluation following coronary computed tomography angiography. Conversely, the implementation of coronary computed tomography angiography can significantly reduce the length of hospital stay, with a significant cost reduction. Additionally, computed tomography is an excellent modality in patients whose symptoms suggest other causes of acute chest pain such as aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, or pulmonary embolism. Furthermore, the acquisition of the coronary arteries, thoracic aorta, and pulmonary arteries in a single computed tomography examination is feasible, allowing ‘triple rule-out’ (exclusion of aortic dissection, pulmonary embolism, and coronary artery disease). Finally, other applications, such as the evaluation of coronary artery plaque composition, myocardial function and perfusion, or fractional flow reserve, are currently being developed and may also become valuable in the setting of acute chest pain in the future.


Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 144 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheikh Bilal B Khalid ◽  
Javaria Mahmood

Introduction: Cisplatin-based chemotherapeutic regimen (CBCR) is known for increasing risk of venous thromboembolic (TE) disease. We report a unique case of STEMI associated with CBCR which we believe was caused by coronary artery thrombosis. Case description: A 31-yo man with a past history of germ cell tumor presented with chest pain radiating to back and left arm. It started this morning and intensity did not worsen with exertion. He denied any dyspnea, diaphoresis or palpitations. He was non-smoker and non-obese. He denied any family history of premature coronary artery disease. He had undergone unilateral orchiectomy a year ago, and was currently receiving chemotherapy with bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin; the last dose of his 3 rd cycle was given the day before. EKG showed ST elevation in leads I, aVL, V4 and V5. Troponin I was high to 6.9 ng/ml (ULN 0.045 ng/ml). He received intravenous infusion of thrombolytic. An angiogram done the next day showed moderate mid-LAD disease with residual clot. A CT scan and an echocardiogram later showed left ventricular thrombus (LVT). He was kept on therapeutic enoxaparin along with aspirin. Follow up echocardiogram showed resolution of the thrombus. His chemotherapy was stopped, and he has been kept on active surveillance since then. Discussion: Most cases of CBCR-associated myocardial infarction that have been reported have been seen in the older population with other risk factors for coronary artery disease. Cases where angiographic data was available, coronary artery vasospasm appeared to be the culprit rather than a true plaque rupture. While the presence of LVT raises possibility of thromboembolism to coronaries causing MI, the angiographic findings support accelerated plaque formation to be the cause of infarction. In earlier reports, elevated pre-treatment level of von Willebrand factor has been postulated to have some role in the disease pathogenesis. Other possible mechanisms for pathogenesis include endothelial cell damage, platelet activation, and imbalance between thromboxane-prostacyclin levels. This case emphasizes the need to keep cardiac etiologies of chest pain in the differential when evaluating patients on CBCR as timely intervention is life saving and prevent morbidity.


Hypertension ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kongkiat Chaikriangkrai ◽  
Mahwash Kassi ◽  
Sayf Khaleel bala ◽  
Su Min Chang

Introduction Obesity has been inconsistently linked with coronary artery calcium score (CACS) as a surrogate of coronary artery disease (CAD) in asymptomatic subjects. Our aim was to examine whether there is relationship between obesity defined by BMI≥30kg/m 2 and presence and severity of CAD defined by CACS in patients with acute chest pain. Methods In this cross-sectional study, 1030 consecutive patients without reported history of coronary artery disease who presented with acute chest pain were included. CACS by non-contrast CT scan and BMI were collected. Patients were categorized by CACS classifications and BMI. Results The population with mean age of 54±13 years, 33% (338 of 1030) of patients being overweight and 46% (477 of 1030) being obese consisted of 60.6% (624 of 1030) patients with zero CACS, 21.7% (223 of 1030) with mild calcification (0<CACS<100) and 17.8% (183 of 1030) with moderate-to-severe calcification (CACS≥100). Compared to non-overweight/non-obese group, obese group had less patients with moderate-to-severe calcification (69 of 477; 14.5% VS 50 of 215; 22.6% p-value=0.016) despite more patients with hypertension (311 of 477; 65.2% VS 98 of 215; 45.6% p-value<0.001), diabetes (98 of 477; 20.5% VS 11 of 215; 5.1% p-value<0.001) and hyperlipidemia(174 of 477; 36.5% VS 57 of 215; 26.5% p-value=0.010). Obesity is INVERSELY associated with presence of CACS and moderate-to-severe calcification in multivariable logistic regression analysis (table 1). Conclusion Obesity defined by body mass index ≥ 30kg/m 2 is INVERSELY associated with presence and severity of coronary artery disease defined by coronary artery calcium score in patients with acute chest pain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document