Prospects for Human Mucosal Vaccines

Author(s):  
Jiri Mestecky ◽  
Jerry R. McGhee
Keyword(s):  
1995 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 1071-1079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy M. Wells ◽  
Pamela M. Norton ◽  
Richard W.F. Le Page

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gourapura J. Renukaradhya ◽  
Varun Dwivedi ◽  
Cordelia Manickam ◽  
Basavaraj Binjawadagi ◽  
David Benfield

AbstractPorcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is an economically important infectious disease of swine. Constant emergence of variant strains of PRRS virus (PPRSV) and virus-mediated immune evasion followed by viral persistence result in increased incidence and recurrence of PRRS in swine herds. Current live and killed PRRSV vaccines administered by a parenteral route are ineffective in inducing complete protection. Thus, new approaches in design and delivery of PRRSV vaccines are needed to reduce the disease burden of the swine industry. Induction of an effective mucosal immunity to several respiratory pathogens by direct delivery of a vaccine to mucosal sites has proven to be effective in a mouse model. However, there are challenges in eliciting mucosal immunity to PRRS due to our limited understanding of safe and potent mucosal adjuvants, which could potentiate the mucosal immune response to PRRSV. The purpose of this review is to discuss methods for induction of protective mucosal immune responses in the respiratory tract of pigs. The manuscript also discusses how PRRSV modulates innate, adaptive and immunoregulatory responses at both mucosal and systemic sites of infected and/or vaccinated pigs. This information may help in the design of innovative mucosal vaccines to elicit superior cross-protective immunity against divergent field strains of PRRSV.


Drugs ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 587-594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Clancy
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 666-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Eriksson ◽  
Jan Holmgren

Author(s):  
A. Miquel‐Clopés ◽  
E. G. Bentley ◽  
J. P. Stewart ◽  
S. R. Carding
Keyword(s):  

Nanovaccines ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 131-157
Author(s):  
Sergio Rosales-Mendoza ◽  
Omar González-Ortega
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Bernasconi ◽  
Karin Norling ◽  
Marta Bally ◽  
Fredrik Höök ◽  
Nils Y. Lycke

Immune protection against infectious diseases is most effective if located at the portal of entry of the pathogen. Hence, there is an increasing demand for vaccine formulations that can induce strong protective immunity following oral, respiratory, or genital tract administration. At present, only few mucosal vaccines are found on the market, but recent technological advancements and a better understanding of the principles that govern priming of mucosal immune responses have contributed to a more optimistic view on the future of mucosal vaccines. Compared to live attenuated vaccines, subcomponent vaccines, most often protein-based, are considered safer, more stable, and less complicated to manufacture, but they require the addition of nontoxic and clinically safe adjuvants to be effective. In addition, another limiting factor is the large antigen dose that usually is required for mucosal vaccines. Therefore, the combination of mucosal adjuvants with the recent progress in nanoparticle technology provides an attractive solution to these problems. In particular, the liposome technology is ideal for combining protein antigen and adjuvant into an effective mucosal vaccine. Here, we describe and discuss recent progress in nanoparticle formulations using various types of liposomes that convey strong promise for the successful development of the next generation of mucosal vaccines.


2004 ◽  
Vol 72 (8) ◽  
pp. 4368-4375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saúl Rojas-Hernández ◽  
Marco A. Rodríguez-Monroy ◽  
Rubén López-Revilla ◽  
Aldo A. Reséndiz-Albor ◽  
Leticia Moreno-Fierros

ABSTRACT Cry1Ac protoxin has potent mucosal and systemic adjuvant effects on antibody responses to proteins or polysaccharides. In this work, we examined whether Cry1Ac increased protective immunity against fatal Naegleria fowleri infection in mice, which resembles human primary amoebic meningoencephalitis. Higher immunoglobulin G (IgG) than IgA anti-N. fowleri responses were elicited in the serum and tracheopulmonary fluids of mice immunized by the intranasal or intraperitoneal route with N. fowleri lysates either alone or with Cry1Ac or cholera toxin. Superior protection against a lethal challenge with 5 × 104 live N. fowleri trophozoites was achieved for immunization by the intranasal route. Intranasal immunization of N. fowleri lysates coadministered with Cry1Ac increased survival to 100%; interestingly, immunization with Cry1Ac alone conferred similar protection to that achieved with amoebal lysates alone (60%). When mice intranasally immunized with Cry1Ac plus lysates were challenged with amoebae, both IgG and IgA mucosal responses were rapidly increased, but only the increased IgG response persisted until day 60 in surviving mice. The brief rise in the level of specific mucosal IgA does not exclude the role that this isotype may play in the early defense against this parasite, since higher IgA responses were detected in nasal fluids of mice intranasally immunized with lysates plus either Cry1Ac or cholera toxin, which, indeed, were the treatments that provided the major protection levels. In contrast, serum antibody responses do not seem to be related to the protection level achieved. Both acquired and innate immune systems seem to play a role in host defense against N. fowleri infection, but further studies are required to elucidate the mechanisms involved in protective effects conferred by Cry1Ac, which may be a valuable tool to improve mucosal vaccines.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document