HIV Infection of Peripheral Blood Dendritic Cells

1991 ◽  
pp. 141-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Patterson ◽  
Steven Macatonia ◽  
Jacqueline Gross ◽  
Penelope Bedford ◽  
Stella Knight
Keyword(s):  
Dendritic Cells ◽  
Hiv Infection ◽  
Peripheral Blood

PLASMACYTOID DENDRITIC CELLS FUNCTION IN HIV INFECTION

2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Martin Hyrcza ◽  
Mario Ostrowski ◽  
Sandy Der
Keyword(s):  
Dendritic Cells ◽  
Influenza Virus ◽  
Hiv Infection ◽  
Gene Transcription ◽  
Sendai Virus ◽  
Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Interferon Response ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type I Ifn

Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are innate immune cells able to produce large quantities of type I interferons (IFN) when activated. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients show generalized immune dysfunction characterized in part by chronic interferon response. In this study we investigated the role of dendritic cells inactivating and maintaining this response. Specifically we compared the IFN geneactivity in pDCs in response to several viruses and TLR agonists. We hypothesized that 1) the pattern of IFN gene transcription would differ in pDCs treated with HIV than with other agents, and 2) that pDCs from patients from different stages of disease would respond differently to the stimulations. To test these hypotheses, we obtained pDCs from 15 HIV-infected and uninfected individuals and treated freshly isolated pDCs with either HIV (BAL strain), influenza virus (A/PR/8/34), Sendai virus (Cantell strain), TLR7 agonist(imiquimod), or TLR9 agonist (CpG-ODN) for 6h. Type I IFN gene transcription was monitored by real time qPCRfor IFNA1, A2, A5, A6, A8,A17, B1, and E1, and cytokine levels were assayed by Cytometric Bead Arrays forTNF?, IL6, IL8, IL10, IL1?, and IL12p70. pDC function as determined by these two assays showed no difference between HIV-infected and uninfected patients or between patients with early or chronic infection. Specifically, HIV did notinduce type I IFN gene expression, whereas influenza virus, Sendai virus and imiquimod did. Similarly, HIV failed to induce any cytokine release from pDCs in contrast to influenza virus, Sendai virus and imiquimod, which stimulatedrelease of TNF?, IL6, or IL8. Together these results suggest that the reaction of pDCs to HIV virus is quantitatively different from the response to agents such as virus, Sendai virus, and imiquimod. In addition, pDCs from HIV-infected persons have responses similar to pDCs from uninfected donors, suggesting, that the DC function may not be affected by HIV infection.

scholarly journals Evaluation of qPCR on blood and skin microbiopsies, peripheral blood buffy coat smear, and urine antigen ELISA for diagnosis and test of cure for visceral leishmaniasis in HIV-coinfected patients in India: a prospective cohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. e042519
Author(s):  
Sophie I Owen ◽  
Sakib Burza ◽  
Shiril Kumar ◽  
Neena Verma ◽  
Raman Mahajan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Visceral Leishmaniasis ◽  
Hiv Infection ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Medical Science ◽  
Bone Marrow Aspiration ◽  
Buffy Coat ◽  
Tropical Medicine ◽  
Urine Antigen ◽  
Antigen Elisa

IntroductionHIV coinfection presents a challenge for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Invasive splenic or bone marrow aspiration with microscopic visualisation of Leishmania parasites remains the gold standard for diagnosis of VL in HIV-coinfected patients. Furthermore, a test of cure by splenic or bone marrow aspiration is required as patients with VL-HIV infection are at a high risk of treatment failure. However, there remain financial, implementation and safety costs to these invasive techniques which severely limit their use under field conditions.Methods and analysisWe aim to evaluate blood and skin qPCR, peripheral blood buffy coat smear microscopy and urine antigen ELISA as non-invasive or minimally invasive alternatives for diagnosis and post-treatment test of cure for VL in HIV-coinfected patients in India, using a sample of 91 patients with parasitologically confirmed symptomatic VL-HIV infection.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval for this study has been granted by The Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, The Institute of Tropical Medicine in Antwerp, the University of Antwerp and the Rajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Science in Patna. Any future publications will be published in open access journals.Trial registration numberCTRI/2019/03/017908.

scholarly journals FRI0015 PHENOTYPE AND FUNCTION OF THE PERIPHERAL BLOOD DENDRITIC CELLS OF PSORIASIS PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT ARTHRITIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 578.1-579
Author(s):  
S. Schnitte ◽  
A. Fuchs ◽  
T. Funk ◽  
A. C. Pecher ◽  
D. Dörfel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Dendritic Cells ◽  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
T Lymphocytes ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Surface Proteins ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cell Counts

Background:Psoriasis is a frequent skin disease that can appear with an arthritic manifestation in approximately 30% of the cases [1]. The underlying excessive immune reaction caused by pro-inflammatory cytokines can be triggered by several risk factors [2]. Various subgroups of Dendritic cells (DCs) in the skin play a crucial role in the induction of the dermal inflammatory response [3].Objectives:As the role of peripheral blood DCs remains unknown and the cause of an arthritic manifestation is still not completely understood [4], this project aimed to detect differences in phenotype or function of peripheral blood DCs in psoriatic patients with or without arthritis.Methods:We analyzed peripheral blood cells of 60 psoriasis patients with and without arthritis. Different DC subpopulations were detected by flow cytometry. Monocyte-derived DCs were cultured with or without Lipopolysaccharides to gain immature (iDC) and mature (mDC) cells. The DC phenotype was determined by staining with CD80, CD83, CD86, CD206, CCR7, CD1a, HLA-DR, CD40, GPN-MB, DC209 and CD14. Their T-cell stimulatory capability was analyzed by co-incubation with Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester stained lymphocytes and the quantification of CD4+ T-lymphocytes afterwards. To measure the migration capacity DCs were seated into transwell chambers with a semipermeable membrane and partly supplemented with Macrophage Inflammatory Protein 3 Beta (Mip3b). Migrated cells were detected by flow cytometry. Measured cell counts were normalized to cell counts without Mip3b stimulation.Results:Comparing the factor of increase of migrated mDC counts due to mip3b stimulation, we detected a significant lower rate in samples of patients with arthritis (PsA) compared to those of patients without (Ps). Assays of mDCs without mip3b stimulation showed a significant higher count of migrated cells in the samples of the arthritic group [Figure 1]. Cell counts with Mip3b stimulation did vary slightly in the groups. The DC subpopulations and the expression of analyzed cell surface proteins did not show significant differences. The amounts of stimulated T-Lymphocytes did not differ significantly.Figure 1.Migration essay showing mDCs following Mip3b (+miß3b) as multiples of mDCs without stimulation (-mip3b). The factor of increase is significantly lower in patients with arthritis (PsA) compared to patients without (Ps). Absolute counts of migrated mDCs without Mip3b are significantly higher in the arthritic group. Cell counts with stimulation do not differ significantly (data not shown). N=24, p<0.05Conclusion:CCL19 (Mip3b) is a potent ligand to the CCR7 receptor inducing migration of DCs towards the lymphatic node [5]. The CCR7 amounts on the DC surface did not differ significantly in the groups. The mDCs without CCL19 stimulation migrated in higher amounts in samples of arthritic patients. Cell counts of stimulated DCs showed only slight differences. These results could be generated by a different appearance of the DCs of arthritic patients that might facilitate migration. Further experiments focusing on this aspect should be performed. A possible effect of disruptive factors (age, sex, medication…) needs to be clarified.References:[1]Henes, J.C., et al.,High prevalence of psoriatic arthritis in dermatological patients with psoriasis: a cross-sectional study.Rheumatol Int, 2014.34(2): p. 227-34.[2]Lee, E.B., et al.,Psoriasis risk factors and triggers.Cutis, 2018.102(5s): p. 18-20.[3]Kim, T.G., S.H. Kim, and M.G. Lee,The Origin of Skin Dendritic Cell Network and Its Role in Psoriasis.Int J Mol Sci, 2017.19(1).[4]Veale, D.J. and U. Fearon,The pathogenesis of psoriatic arthritis.Lancet, 2018.391(10136): p. 2273-2284.[5]Ricart, B.G., et al.,Dendritic cells distinguish individual chemokine signals through CCR7 and CXCR4.J Immunol, 2011.186(1): p. 53-61.Acknowledgments:This project was financially supported by Novartis Pharma GmbH.Disclosure of Interests:Sarah Schnitte Grant/research support from: Reaserch grant by Novartis, Alexander Fuchs: None declared, Tanja Funk: None declared, Ann-Christin Pecher: None declared, Daniela Dörfel: None declared, Jörg Henes Grant/research support from: Novartis, Roche-Chugai, Consultant of: Novartis, Roche, Celgene, Pfizer, Abbvie, Sanofi, Boehringer-Ingelheim,

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document