New Strategy following Peritoneal Catheter Implantation in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

1990 ◽  
pp. 280-282
Author(s):  
L. De Clerck ◽  
P. Ruedin ◽  
H. Favre
1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
George E. Digenis ◽  
Georgi Abraham ◽  
Eugene Savin ◽  
Peter Blake ◽  
Nicholas Dombros ◽  
...  

A total of 636 episodes of peritonitis occurred in 440 patients who entered our continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) program from September 1977 to February 1988. Sixteen patients (8 male and 8 female, aged 37–77 years) died during an episode of peritonitis (fatality rate 2.5%). They had been on CAPD for 3 to 105 (average 39) months. Six of them were diabetics. The peritonitis rate among these 16 patients were 1 episode per 12 patient months, while the corresponding figure for the whole (440) CAPD population was 14 patient months. Risk factors present in the 16 patients were: cardiovascular disease (12), cerebrovascular accident (2) peripheral artery disease (1) and pulmonary fibrosis (1). Fever and leukocytosis were present on admission in 11 patients, while total serum proteins and albumin were significantly lower (p < 0.001) than the corresponding values before peritonitis (56 ± 8 vs. 65 ± 5). Staph. aureus was isolated in 8 patients (50%), multiple organisms in 6, Pseudomonas and Candida albicans in 1 each. An abdominal abscess was found in 4 (25%) patients. The peritoneal catheter was removed between the 5th and 10th day in 6 and after the 10th day in 7 patients. Peritonitis with sepsis was the cause of death in 13 patients. Contributing factors were cardiovascular accident in 9, uremic coma in 2, extensive GI bleeding in 2, GI performation in 2, intestinal infarction in 1, and pneumonia in 2 patients. We conclude that the risk of peritonitis-related death in CAPD patients is increased with Staph. aureus or multibacterial peritonitis. Contributing factors are concomitant cardiovascular disease and delayed (>5 days) catheter removal.


1984 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 257-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Shohat Zaki ◽  
Shapira Alexander Yussim ◽  
Geoffrey Boner

A 73-year-old man, who had been on CAPD for two years, presented with massive intraperitoneal hemorrhage. On laparotomy the peritoneal catheter was situated in a large pouch that was lined by fibrous tissue. The hemorrhage arose from erosion of the pouch wall -an unusual cause of intraperitoneal bleeding in the CAPD patient. Massive intraperitoneal bleeding is a rare complication of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Mild to moderate bleeding, which is more common in CAPD, usually is related to disintegration of small blood vessels. In most patients the bleeding is self-limited. This paper describes an unusual cause of massive bleeding in a CAPD patient.


2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krstić Slobodan ◽  
Trbojević-Stanković Jasna ◽  
Žunić Snežana ◽  
Jovanović Nataša ◽  
Stojimirović Biljana

AbstractExperimental models have strongly contributed to the comprehension of the processes of peritoneal damage that take place during peritoneal dialysis treatment in human patients. A variety of peritoneal dialysis models have been developed, mostly using rats and rabbits.In this study we present the successful development of a custom-made improvised peritoneal catheter for an experimental non-uremic rabbit model of peritoneal dialysis.A detailed description of the surgical technique of peritoneal catheter implantation, care and removal is provided.This innovative approach to constructing a peritoneal catheter in rabbit animal model of peritoneal dialysis is easy, reproducible and inexpensive. The surgical technique applied provided adequate tissue samples for both light and electron microscopy.


1980 ◽  
Vol 1 (7) ◽  
pp. 123-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques Rottembourg ◽  
Dominique Jacq ◽  
Marcel Vonlanthen ◽  
Belkacem Issad Yassin El Shahat

ISRN Surgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Emin Gunes ◽  
Gungor Uzum ◽  
Oguz Koc ◽  
Yiğit Duzkoylu ◽  
Meltem Kucukyilmaz ◽  
...  

Introduction. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is widely accepted for the management of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Although not as widely used as hemodialysis, CAPD has clear advantages, especially those related to patient satisfaction and simplicity. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion can be accomplished by several different techniques. In this study, we aimed to evaluate our results obtained with peritoneal dialysis catheter placement by combination of pelvic fixation plus preperitoneal tunneling. Material and Methods. Laparoscopic peritoneal catheter implantation by combining preperitoneal tunneling and pelvic fixation methods was performed in 82 consecutive patients with end-stage renal disease. Sex, age, primary disease etiology, complications, mean duration of surgery, mean duration of hospital stay, morbidity, mortality, and catheter survival rates and surgical technique used were assessed. Analysis of catheter survival was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results. Mean follow-up period was 28.35 ± 14.5 months (range of 13–44 months). Mean operative time was 28 ± 6 minutes, and mean duration of hospital stay was 3 ± 1 days. There were no conversions from laparoscopy to other insertion methods. None of the patients developed serious complications during surgery or the postoperative period. No infections of the exit site or subcutaneous tunnel, hemorrhagic complications, abdominal wall hernias, or extrusion of the superficial catheter cuff was detected. No mortality occurred in this series of patients. Catheter survival was found to be 92% at 3 years followup. Conclusions. During one-year followup, we had seven patients of migrated catheters due to separation of pelvic fixation suture from peritoneal surface, but they were reimplanted and fixated again laparoscopically with success. Over a three-year followup period, catheter survival was found to be 92%. In the literature, similar catheter survival rates without combination of the two techniques are reported. As a conclusion, although laparoscopic placement of PD catheters avoids many perioperative and early complications, as well as increasing catheter free survival period and quality of life, our results comparing to other studies in the literature indicate that different laparoscopic placement methods are still in debate, and further studies are necessary to make a more accurate decision.


Hernia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 867-872
Author(s):  
P. Horvath ◽  
A. Königsrainer ◽  
T. Mühlbacher ◽  
K. Thiel ◽  
C. Thiel

1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Shashi Kant ◽  
Daniel Goetz ◽  
Cynthia Marzluff ◽  
Denise Motz

Relapsing peritonitis was assessed in the continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) population of a large, outpatient dialysis facility. Prolonged systemic treatment with antibiotics often fails, resulting in the eventual removal and subsequent reimplantation of the catheter. We have tried a new approach to avoid removal of the peritoneal catheter. Patients were treated by the interruption of CAPD, conversion to hemodialysis or discontinuation of dialysis for a period of 7 to 21 days while continuing systemic antibiotics. Over a period of 76.63 patient years, 69 episodes of bacterial peritonitis occurred (0.9 episodes per patient year). Of these, five episodes could be classified as relapsing peritonitis. Five patients with gram-positive relapsing peritonitis were treated by this regimen; all responded with a cure. Our results suggest that relapsing peritonitis can be eradicated without the removal of the peritoneal catheter.


1984 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zbylut J. Twardowski ◽  
Richard J. Tully ◽  
W. Kirt Nichols ◽  
Sobha Sunderrajan

Two patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) presented with abdominal, and scrotal or vulvar edema. In both we suspected a dialysate leak, but the leak site could not be defined clinically. In one patient, a plain CT scan (without contrast in dialysate) revealed a small inguinal hernia and ruled out a pericatheter leak. In the other patient the route of fluid leakage could not be detected on a plain CT scan, or when images were taken immediately after contrast injection into dialysate, while the patient remained in the supine position on the CT table. Images taken two hours after contrast injection, with the patient ambulatory in the meantime, disclosed a leak through the tunnel of a previous peritoneal catheter. The diagnosis was confirmed at operation in both patients. Our experience suggests that when the diagnosis cannot be established clinically, CT scan may be useful to delineate a leak site.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document