Exercises on Form Factor Models

1980 ◽  
pp. 443-445
Author(s):  
J. A. Avery
Keyword(s):  
Form Factor ◽  
Factor Models

Two-nucleon transfer reactions with form factor models

1983 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Osman
Keyword(s):  
Form Factor ◽  
Factor Models ◽  
Transfer Reactions ◽  
Nucleon Transfer

Form factor models and chiral symmetry

1970 ◽  
Vol 3 (8) ◽  
pp. 229-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. H. Frampton
Keyword(s):  
Form Factor ◽  
Chiral Symmetry ◽  
Factor Models

The effect of temperature on high-resolution TEM image contrast

1995 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 640-641
Author(s):  
T. Geipel ◽  
W. Mader ◽  
P. Pirouz
Keyword(s):  
Form Factor ◽  
Inelastic Scattering ◽  
Accurate Method ◽  
Waller Factor ◽  
Effect Of Temperature ◽  
Specimen Thickness ◽  
Influence Of Temperature ◽  
Debye Waller Factor ◽  
Influence Of Temperature On ◽  
Atomic Form Factor

Temperature affects both elastic and inelastic scattering of electrons in a crystal. The Debye-Waller factor, B, describes the influence of temperature on the elastic scattering of electrons, whereas the imaginary part of the (complex) atomic form factor, fc = fr + ifi, describes the influence of temperature on the inelastic scattering of electrons (i.e. absorption). In HRTEM simulations, two possible ways to include absorption are: (i) an approximate method in which absorption is described by a phenomenological constant, μ, i.e. fi; - μfr, with the real part of the atomic form factor, fr, obtained from Hartree-Fock calculations, (ii) a more accurate method in which the absorptive components, fi of the atomic form factor are explicitly calculated. In this contribution, the inclusion of both the Debye-Waller factor and absorption on HRTEM images of a (Oll)-oriented GaAs crystal are presented (using the EMS software.Fig. 1 shows the the amplitudes and phases of the dominant 111 beams as a function of the specimen thickness, t, for the cases when μ = 0 (i.e. no absorption, solid line) and μ = 0.1 (with absorption, dashed line).

MAGNETIC FORM FACTOR MEASUREMENTS IN CERIUM HEXABORIDE

1982 ◽  
Vol 43 (C7) ◽  
pp. C7-273-C7-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Burlet ◽  
J. X. Boucherle ◽  
J. Rossat-Mignod ◽  
J. W. Cable ◽  
W. C. Koehler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Form Factor ◽  
Magnetic Form Factor

FORM FACTOR MEASUREMENTS IN CeTe

1982 ◽  
Vol 43 (C7) ◽  
pp. C7-263-C7-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. X. Boucherle ◽  
D. Ravot ◽  
J. Schweizer
Keyword(s):  
Form Factor

FORM FACTOR MEASUREMENT IN FERROMAGNETIC COBALT ORTHOVANADATE

1982 ◽  
Vol 43 (C7) ◽  
pp. C7-253-C7-256
Author(s):  
H. Fuess ◽  
R. Müller ◽  
D. Schwabe ◽  
F. Tasset
Keyword(s):  
Form Factor ◽  
Factor Measurement ◽  
Ferromagnetic Cobalt

Super-Conducting Quantum Interference Device Technique: 3-D Localization of a Short within a Flip Chip Assembly

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kendall Scott Wills ◽  
Omar Diaz de Leon ◽  
Kartik Ramanujachar ◽  
Charles P. Todd
Keyword(s):  
Form Factor ◽  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Time Domain ◽  
Quantum Interference ◽  
Flip Chip ◽  
Time Domain Reflectometry ◽  
Interfacial Region ◽  
Precise Localization ◽  
Super Conducting ◽  
Accuracy Of Measurement

Abstract In the current generations of devices the die and its package are closely integrated to achieve desired performance and form factor. As a result, localization of continuity failures to either the die or the package is a challenging step in failure analysis of such devices. Time Domain Reflectometry [1] (TDR) is used to localize continuity failures. However the accuracy of measurement with TDR is inadequate for effective localization of the failsite. Additionally, this technique does not provide direct 3-Dimenstional information about the location of the defect. Super-conducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID) Microscope is useful in localizing shorts in packages [2]. SQUID microscope can localize defects to within 5um in the X and Y directions and 35um in the Z direction. This accuracy is valuable in precise localization of the failsite within the die, package or the interfacial region in flipchip assemblies.

Control of processing at multi-tool two-support setup

2020 ◽  
pp. 67-73
Author(s):  
N.D. YUsubov ◽  
G.M. Abbasova
Keyword(s):  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Angular Displacement ◽  
Factor Models ◽  
Technological System ◽  
Displacement Control ◽  
Model Accuracy ◽  
Six Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Angular Displacements ◽  
And Control

The accuracy of two-tool machining on automatic lathes is analyzed. Full-factor models of distortions and scattering fields of the performed dimensions, taking into account the flexibility of the technological system on six degrees of freedom, i. e. angular displacements in the technological system, were used in the research. Possibilities of design and control of two-tool adjustment are considered. Keywords turning processing, cutting mode, two-tool setup, full-factor model, accuracy, angular displacement, control, calculation [email protected]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document