Cutaneous Stimulation

2011 ◽  
pp. 727-731
Author(s):  
Aage R. Møller
The Foot ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Collings ◽  
J. Paton ◽  
N. Chockalingam ◽  
T. Gorst ◽  
J. Marsden

1983 ◽  
Vol 129 (5) ◽  
pp. 1047-1048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C. Flanigan ◽  
Harold M. August ◽  
Byron Young ◽  
Bruce A. Lucas ◽  
J. William Mcroberts

1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 450-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Svensson ◽  
Satoshi Minoshima ◽  
Ahmad Beydoun ◽  
Thomas J. Morrow ◽  
Kenneth L. Casey

Svensson, Peter, Satoshi Minoshima, Ahmad Beydoun, Thomas J. Morrow, and Kenneth L. Casey. Cerebral processing of acute skin and muscle pain in humans. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 450–460, 1997. The human cerebral processing of noxious input from skin and muscle was compared with the use of positron emission tomography with intravenous H2 15O to detect changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) as an indicator of neuronal activity. During each of eight scans, 11 normal subjects rated the intensity of stimuli delivered to the nondominant (left) forearm on a scale ranging from 0 to 100 with 70 as pain threshold. Cutaneous pain was produced with a high-energy CO2 laser stimulator. Muscle pain was elicited with high-intensity intramuscular electrical stimulation. The mean ratings of perceived intensity for innocuous and noxious stimulation were32.6 ± 4.5 (SE) and 78.4 ± 1.7 for cutaneous stimulation and 15.4 ± 4.2 and 73.5 ± 1.4 for intramuscular stimulation. The pain intensity ratings and the differences between noxious and innocuous ratings were similar for cutaneous and intramuscular stimuli ( P > 0.05). After stereotactic registration, statistical pixel-by-pixel summation ( Z score) and volumes-of-interest (VOI) analyses of subtraction images were performed. Significant increases in rCBF to both noxious cutaneous and intramuscular stimulation were found in the contralateral secondary somatosensory cortex (SII) and inferior parietal lobule [Brodmann area (BA) 40]. Comparable levels of rCBF increase were found in the contralateral anterior insular cortex, thalamus, and ipsilateral cerebellum. Noxious cutaneous stimulation caused significant activation in the contralateral lateral prefrontal cortex (BA 10/46) and ipsilateral premotor cortex (BA 4/6). Noxious intramuscular stimulation evoked rCBF increases in the contralateral anterior cingulate cortex (BA 24) and subsignificant responses in the contralateral primary sensorimotor cortex (MI/SI) and lenticular nucleus. These activated cerebral structures may represent those recruited early in nociceptive processing because both forms of stimuli were near pain threshold. Correlation analyses showed a negative relationship between changes in rCBF for thalamus and MI/SI for cutaneous stimulation, and positive relationships between thalamus and anterior insula for both stimulus modalities. Direct statistical comparisons between innocuous cutaneous and intramuscular stimulation with the use of Z scores and VOI analyses showed no reliable differences between these two forms of noxious stimulation, indicating a substantial overlap in brain activation pattern. The comparison of noxious cutaneous and intramuscular stimulation indicated more activation in the premotor cortex, SII, and prefrontal cortex with cutaneous stimulation, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. The similar cerebral activation patterns suggest that the perceived differences between acute skin and muscle pain are mediated by differences in the intensity and temporospatial pattern of neuronal activity within similar sets of forebrain structures.


2006 ◽  
Vol 96 (6) ◽  
pp. 3423-3432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thaddeus S. Brink ◽  
Kevin M. Hellman ◽  
Aaron M. Lambert ◽  
Peggy Mason

Suppression of reactions to one noxious stimulus by a spatially distant noxious stimulus is termed heterotopic antinociception. In lightly anesthetized rats, a noxious visceral stimulus, colorectal distension (CRD), suppressed motor withdrawals but not blood pressure or heart rate changes evoked by noxious hindpaw heat. Microinjection of muscimol, a GABAA receptor agonist, into raphe magnus (RM) reduced CRD-evoked suppression of withdrawals, evidence that RM neurons contribute to this heterotopic antinociception. To understand how brain stem neurons contribute to heterotopic antinociception, RM neurons were recorded during CRD-elicited suppression of hindpaw withdrawals. Although subsets of RM neurons that were excited (on cells) or inhibited (off cells) by noxious cutaneous stimulation were either excited or inhibited by CRD, on cells were inhibited and off cells excited by an intracerebroventricularly administered opioid, evidence that the nociception-facilitating and -inhibiting functions of on and off cells, respectively, are predicted by the cellular response to noxious cutaneous stimulation alone and not by the response to CRD. When recorded during CRD-elicited antinociception, RM cell discharge resembled the pattern observed in response to CRD stimulation alone. However, when hindpaw withdrawal suppression was incomplete, RM cell discharge resembled the pattern observed in response to heat alone. We propose that on cells excited by CRD facilitate responses to CRD itself, which in turn augments excitation of off cells that then act to suppress cutaneous nociception. RM cells may thereby contribute to the dominance of quiet recuperative reactions evoked by potentially life-threatening visceral stimuli over transient somatomotor activity elicited by less-injurious noxious cutaneous stimuli.


1978 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 737-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichi ITO ◽  
Masakazu KASEDA ◽  
Akio SATO ◽  
Yuko TORIGATA

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 3127-3136 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. M. Horn ◽  
T. M. Hamm ◽  
A. R. Gibson

Horn, K. M., T. M. Hamm, and A. R. Gibson. Red nucleus stimulation inhibits within the inferior olive. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 3127–3136, 1998. In the anesthetized cat, electrical stimulation of the magnocellular red nucleus (RNm) inhibits responses of rostral dorsal accessory olive (rDAO) neurons to cutaneous stimulation. We tested the hypothesis that RNm-mediated inhibition occurs within the inferior olive by using stimulation of the ventral funiculus (VF) of the spinal cord in place of cutaneous stimulation of the hindlimb. Fibers in the VF terminate on hindlimb rDAO neurons, so inhibition of this input would have to occur within the olive. rDAO responses elicited by VF stimulation were inhibited by prior stimulation of the RNm, indicating that inhibition occurs within the olive. In contrast, evoked potentials recorded from the VF or dorsal columns following hindlimb stimulation were not affected by prior stimulation of RNm, indicating that stimulation of the RNm does not inhibit olivary afferents at spinal levels. RNm stimulation that inhibited rDAO responses had little effect on evoked somatosensory responses in thalamus, indicating that inhibition generated by activity in RNm may be specific to rDAO. To test limb specificity of RNm-mediated inhibition, conditioning stimulation was applied to the dorsolateral funiculus at thoracic levels, which selectively activates RNm neurons projecting to the lumbar cord. Stimulation at thoracic levels inhibited evoked responses from hindlimb but not forelimb regions of rDAO, suggesting that inhibitory effects of RNm activity are limb specific. Several studies have reported that olivary neurons have reduced sensitivity to peripheral stimulation during movement; it is likely that RNm-mediated inhibition occurring within the olive contributes to this reduction of sensitivity. Inhibition of rDAO responses by descending motor pathways appears to be a salient feature of olivary function.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document